OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bullhead City Council Work Session on Land Exchange and Fee Schedule – February 17, 2026

City CouncilTuesday, February 17, 2026
BodyBullhead City, Arizona
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, February 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:57:41

Transcript — Verbatim
1:19

Good afternoon.

1:20

Today is Tuesday, February 17th, 2026.

1:24

It is 3:30 PM, and we'll call this work session an executive session of the Bullhead City Council to order.

1:31

Can have a roll call.

1:32

Council members are present.

1:34

Thank you.

1:35

Item one.

1:38

Are you gonna read item one, Debbie, or do you want to just hop right into it?

1:42

I whatever you want to do, Toby.

1:45

We can hop right into it.

1:46

You got it.

1:47

All right.

1:47

Sounds good.

1:48

Our first item this afternoon council is to talk about the transfer of the land donated to the city as part of the Black Mountain Range uh project.

2:00

So Travis put together a heck of a packet.

2:04

I'm sure you've all had a chance to read it.

2:06

But today what we need to do is try to bring that whole process to a conclusion.

2:11

So we're looking for your advice and what you'd hope to see be brought back at a future meeting.

2:31

And so I'll turn it over to Travis, and then I'll probably have a few things uh and questions to ask uh the council after Travis's presentation.

2:41

Thank you, Toby.

2:42

Good afternoon, Mayor, Council.

2:44

Um the item before you tonight, or for discussion, um, so we wanted to give you some background and information on, as Toby explained, a land transfer that we've been working on for some time now.

2:56

So this this transfer actually dates back all the way, uh I believe it's 2019, if I'm correct.

3:04

Um so we're upwards of uh I believe or since the actual signing of the agreement we're six years into this.

3:12

Um so the uh just for background purposes, this the state uh or I'm sorry, the federal government has this general kind of uh process that they uh go through whenever you are looking to have land transferred to the city coffers.

3:27

Um you can't just go and ask for the land and say, give me this piece of land out here.

3:32

If we do identify land, we think it uh uh we would like to have it.

3:35

We can work through a legislative process to have the land transferred, and typically really the basis of the transfer is you give them land they give you land of you of equal value.

3:49

So that's how where we're at uh in this process.

3:52

Um so there's some land that we had acquired.

3:56

Um and um the city manager probably can give you a better history on how we actually got this land, but I believe it came from the Laughlin family, transferred over to the city, and then um we identified the land down by community park, as you'll see in your packet as a potential land transfer.

4:13

So the land by community park is owned by the federal government, and we're um thinking um the option is to transfer the land, the black mountain land over.

4:24

Um so in throughout the whole process, the the uh federal government, they have a a um um appraiser come in, look at the land values, give you uh direct values, and then again, as I said, you build a process where you swap equal value of land.

4:47

It's a several acres of land, a lot of land.

4:51

It doesn't have the same value that it has for a l uh the land that uh we're looking at right on the highway.

5:00

In most cases, the idea is that you're trading land that may not have the development potential as the new land.

5:05

So in this case, um, as you see in the appraisal, the appraiser believes that this is more the land by community park is more developable.

5:14

Um so as Toby stated, we've gone through the process and really we're at kind of the final decision making process where okay, do we take the final step and move forward and initiate the transfer?

5:26

So we just want to educate you all and get input and thoughts about where we're at on this product on that.

5:34

Again, this isn't a this is surely a workshop.

5:36

We're not here to finalize a decision, could be a decision that comes back later at a future meeting, but this is just a workshop at this time.

5:44

Um so I think you have most of the details in your packet.

5:48

So I won't go on a lot about beyond that, but I am here.

5:52

If you have any questions, anything that doesn't that you need clarified, I'm here to answer any questions.

5:58

And Travis is right, the land and buildings were donated by Don Laughlin.

6:03

In fact, in 2015, we had to wait five years under that agreement for a basically a tax write-off by the by Mr.

6:13

Laughlin and uh their business.

6:16

So ultimately, we waited until 2020 to start that process, and uh the land exchange was approved, and we thought you know this would go great, and the federal government would be gung-ho to get these things done, and they're they're slow, they're super slow.

6:33

So we're finally at least to a point where we can have this discussion today so that we can move forward.

6:39

So I think the options in front of us are a few.

6:42

Um probably the preferred option would be to do the exchange.

6:48

So it's 1,100 acres up on the top of the Black Mountains that you really can't get to.

6:54

It could be sold if we didn't do this uh to a rancher or someone just looking to build a land holding up on the top of the mountains.

7:03

Uh we could do that independently and never look back.

7:07

Now, the benefit of doing the land swap would be that we would actually own half acre to an acre when it's all said and done of land and community park.

7:19

So right now we lease it all through the public purpose leases, which are restrictive, right?

7:25

So it's as if we own it, but we can't turn around and sell it, we can't turn around and put a Starbucks on it.

7:32

We can't even put a building and outsource the concessions, right?

7:37

So when people say, hey, the bell, why don't you outsource the the concession there?

7:41

We can't.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety██████████████████████22%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████10%
Parks and Recreation██████████10%
Public Engagement█████████9%
Water And Wastewater Management█████████9%
Education and Workforce█████████9%
Budget Equity Analysis█████5%
Fiscal Sustainability█████5%
Tourism Promotion█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Bullhead City Council Work Session – February 17, 2026

The Bullhead City Council held a work session and subsequent executive session on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, at 3:30 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting focused on two discussion items: a proposed land exchange with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and proposed changes to the city's Comprehensive Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. No formal votes were taken; the session was intended for council education and discussion.

Discussion Items

Item 1: BLM Land Exchange

  • Assistant City Manager Travis Pruitt provided an educational overview of the proposed exchange, which has been in development since 2019 under an Agreement to Initiate a Land Exchange (ATI) authorized by Section 1015 of the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act.
  • The city would convey approximately 1,040 acres of remote, non-contiguous land in the Black Mountain Range (appraised at $500,000 as of September 5, 2025) to the BLM. In return, the BLM would convey approximately 0.65 acres of federally owned land along the west side of Highway 95 near Laughlin Ranch Boulevard (also appraised at $500,000).
  • City Manager Toby Cotter explained that the city originally received 1,080 acres as a donation from Don Laughlin in 2015. A 40-acre parcel with improvements was sold in 2022 for $900,000. The proposed exchange would place high-visibility Highway 95 frontage into city ownership, supporting future economic development and allowing the city to sublease or develop the parcel—something currently prohibited under existing public purpose leases.
  • Council members expressed near-unanimous support for the exchange. Councilmember Jason Dalman noted the strategic value of acquiring land in Community Park and suggested an independent appraisal could be considered, though staff clarified the BLM would not accept a non-federal appraisal. Councilmember Sheri Newland agreed 100% and highlighted leasing options. Councilmember Jack Ring, Councilmember Dawne O'Neill, Councilmember Steve Smith, and Councilmember James Smith all voiced support. Councilmember Smith noted disappointment that the donated house sold for less than hoped but urged moving forward. The consensus was to proceed, with staff directed to bring the matter back for formal approval at a future regular meeting.

Item 2: Comprehensive Fee Schedule Changes

  • Finance Director Robert Drexler presented proposed changes to the fee schedule, effective July 1, 2026. Key changes included:
    • Development Services (Building, Planning & Zoning): A 1% across-the-board increase to keep pace with inflation.
    • Recreation: Addition of a $150 per day fee for the Gary Keith Pavilion for churches and nonprofits (previously free). This sparked debate. Councilmembers Newland and Smith objected to charging nonprofits, noting many contribute back to the city. Councilmember Dalman supported the fee, calling it a small amount given city support to those groups. Staff noted the fee could be waived with appropriate policy language. It was decided to include the fee in the posted schedule but revisit at final adoption on May 5, 2026.
    • Utilities: Several changes: removal of a transfer fee; language cleanup for late charges; increase in late charge from 1.5% to 5% of balance per month; addition of a fee for cleaning fats, oils, and grease (FOG) at actual cost per incident; a new

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. Today is Tuesday, February 17th, 2026. It is 3:30 PM, and we'll call this work session an executive session of the Bullhead City Council to order. Can have a roll call. Council members are present. Thank you. Item one. Are you gonna read item one, Debbie, or do you want to just hop right into it? I whatever you want to do, Toby. We can hop right into it. You got it. All right. Sounds good. Our first item this afternoon council is to talk about the transfer of the land donated to the city as part of the Black Mountain Range uh project. So Travis put together a heck of a packet. I'm sure you've all had a chance to read it. But today what we need to do is try to bring that whole process to a conclusion. So we're looking for your advice and what you'd hope to see be brought back at a future meeting. And so I'll turn it over to Travis, and then I'll probably have a few things uh and questions to ask uh the council after Travis's presentation. Thank you, Toby. Good afternoon, Mayor, Council. Um the item before you tonight, or for discussion, um, so we wanted to give you some background and information on, as Toby explained, a land transfer that we've been working on for some time now. So this this transfer actually dates back all the way, uh I believe it's 2019, if I'm correct. Um so we're upwards of uh I believe or since the actual signing of the agreement we're six years into this. Um so the uh just for background purposes, this the state uh or I'm sorry, the federal government has this general kind of uh process that they uh go through whenever you are looking to have land transferred to the city coffers. Um you can't just go and ask for the land and say, give me this piece of land out here. If we do identify land, we think it uh uh we would like to have it. We can work through a legislative process to have the land transferred, and typically really the basis of the transfer is you give them land they give you land of you of equal value. So that's how where we're at uh in this process. Um so there's some land that we had acquired. Um and um the city manager probably can give you a better history on how we actually got this land, but I believe it came from the Laughlin family, transferred over to the city, and then um we identified the land down by community park, as you'll see in your packet as a potential land transfer. So the land by community park is owned by the federal government, and we're um thinking um the option is to transfer the land, the black mountain land over. Um so in throughout the whole process, the the uh federal government, they have a a um um appraiser come in, look at the land values, give you uh direct values, and then again, as I said, you build a process where you swap equal value of land. It's a several acres of land, a lot of land. It doesn't have the same value that it has for a l uh the land that uh we're looking at right on the highway. In most cases, the idea is that you're trading land that may not have the development potential as the new land. So in this case, um, as you see in the appraisal, the appraiser believes that this is more the land by community park is more developable. Um so as Toby stated, we've gone through the process and really we're at kind of the final decision making process where okay, do we take the final step and move forward and initiate the transfer? So we just want to educate you all and get input and thoughts about where we're at on this product on that. Again, this isn't a this is surely a workshop. We're not here to finalize a decision, could be a decision that comes back later at a future meeting, but this is just a workshop at this time. Um so I think you have most of the details in your packet. So I won't go on a lot about beyond that, but I am here. If you have any questions, anything that doesn't that you need clarified, I'm here to answer any questions. And Travis is right, the land and buildings were donated by Don Laughlin. In fact, in 2015, we had to wait five years under that agreement for a basically a tax write-off by the by Mr. Laughlin and uh their business. So ultimately, we waited until 2020 to start that process, and uh the land exchange was approved, and we thought you know this would go great, and the federal government would be gung-ho to get these things done, and they're they're slow, they're super slow. So we're finally at least to a point where we can have this discussion today so that we can move forward. So I think the options in front of us are a few.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com