OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Charles County, Maryland/County Commissioners & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Charles County Board of Commissioners Hearing on Affordable Housing PILOTs and Local Legislative Proposals, April 21, 2026

County Commissioners & Boards — Tuesday, April 21, 2026
BodyCharles County, Maryland
SessionCounty Commissioners & Boards
DateTuesday, April 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:22:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:15

Charles County Government presents the Board of Commissioners.

Speaker 2

0:24

Good evening, Commissioners.

0:26

We're going to begin this evening's session with a roll call.

0:28

Commissioner Bowling.

Speaker 3

0:30

Present.

Speaker 2

0:31

Commissioner Coates.

0:33

Commissioner Stewart.

0:35

Commissioner Patterson.

0:36

Present.

0:36

And Commissioner Collins.

0:40

Commissioner Collins.

0:42

Thank you.

0:44

Commissioners, the next item on your agenda is your first public hearing for this evening.

0:50

Commissioner Collins, if you want to read the statement.

Speaker 4

0:53

Good afternoon, everyone.

0:54

The purpose of this evening's session is to hold a public hearing on pilot work group summary of projects for funding consideration.

1:04

If it pleases the commissioners, I will dispense with the reading of the public notice.

1:10

For the public, when it's your turn to speak, please state your name and address clearly for the record.

1:18

Statement should relate to the subject matter of this identified hearing.

1:23

Statement should be brief to the point and limited to three minutes or less.

1:29

Proper language is required at all times.

1:33

Additionally, please understand that this is a public hearing, which means that this is the commissioner's opportunity to hear directly from the public.

1:44

This is the public's opportunity to speak.

1:47

Consequently, the commissioners will not be entertaining questions or debating the issue.

1:53

The commissioners do reserve the right to extend the time frame or to continue the hearing until another date.

2:01

With that stated, we will now begin the public hearing.

Unassigned speaker

2:06

Good

Speaker 5

2:07

evening, Commissioners.

2:07

Dina Barclay, Director of Community Services.

2:10

And just to introduce my colleagues here, Joel Binkley sitting next to me, planning supervisor, planning growth management.

2:16

Mark Thompson, Chief of Commercial Development for Economic Development, and Jake Dyer, Director of Fiscal and Administrative Services.

2:23

So as you recall, we're coming back to you today for the public hearing portion of our process in the pilot agreement for affordable housing.

2:31

And I do want to be transparent that both of the developers who submitted projects are with us here this evening.

2:37

PAX development and impact development.

2:40

And if they signed up to speak, they will not be presenting.

2:43

They're just going to get the same three minutes as the public as well.

2:46

So did want to let you know that they were available tonight.

2:50

So the first slide, it basically is what is affordable housing.

2:53

Some of this may look familiar to you.

2:55

We repurposing some of our slides from our previous presentation to you.

2:59

But this is the definition of affordable housing that we used in our work group, providing critical economic stability, improved health outcomes, and better educational opportunities for residents while fostering stronger, more productive communities.

3:12

Affordable housing reduces financial strain, allowing households to afford necessities like food and health care, decreasing homelessness and supporting local economies through job creation and increased consumer spending.

3:23

So when folks have more disposable income by reducing their housing costs, they have more income to spend on other things, necessities as well as community activities and amenities for themselves.

3:35

The affordable housing shortage key impact.

3:38

Oh, is that your slide?

3:39

I'm sorry.

Unassigned speaker

3:40

Yes, I keep it.

Speaker 5

3:41

I'm going to keep reading this one because I would have started.

3:43

The key impacts for affordable housing shortage, uh lower increases excuse me, has lower levels of discretionary household income, uh, lower levels of business investment, and lower economic well-being.

Speaker 6

3:59

Thank you again, Commissioners, um, for your time today on this important topic.

4:03

As I've discussed before, work uh affordable housing has become a critical point of economic development in terms of workforce development.

4:12

Um, our new mantra is housing is where jobs sleep.

4:16

And I've uh we continue discuss that and amongst my colleagues in the economic development space.

4:23

Um, we're meeting this coming week.

4:25

Uh meet it through the Maryland Economic Development Association and housing and affordable housing is actually on our agenda, and that's been different from how it used to be.

4:35

But again, it's a critical component from an economic development perspective.

4:40

Obviously, it increases our tax base.

4:42

Um construction and re or rehabilitation enables us to increase the commercial tax base and residential tax base.

Unassigned speaker

4:52

Workforce support is critical in attracting companies to be able to have a stock of affordable housing is is critical.

Speaker 6

5:01

Companies are looking at that across the country.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing█████████████████████████████████33%
Data Center Regulation██████████10%
Procedural█████████9%
Government Accountability████████8%
Economic Development███████7%
Public Engagement██████6%
Homeowners Association Dispute Resolution█████5%
Vacant Commercial Property Registration████4%
Homelessness██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Charles County Board of Commissioners Hearing on Affordable Housing PILOTs and Local Legislative Proposals, April 21, 2026

On April 21, 2026, the Charles County Board of Commissioners held two public hearings. The first addressed PILOT agreements for affordable housing, and the second covered 21 local legislative proposals for changes to the county code.

Public Hearing on Affordable Housing Pilot Program

Staff from Community Services, Planning, Economic Development, and Fiscal Services presented the work of the Affordable Housing Pilot Work Group. They detailed a shortage of approximately 1,200 affordable housing units for households earning 30–80% of the Area Median Income. The three recommended projects (Eagle Point Phase 1, Lendville Crossing, Pineway Village) would provide 289 affordable units, meeting roughly 25% of the identified deficit. The total annual tax abatement for the three projects over the 20-year PILOT term is $388,127.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Support: Max Scott (resident), Scott Link and Jessica Zuniga (PAX Development/Foundation Development), Sharon Cox (property owner), Joe Horak (developer), Logan Kewig and William Sternlick (Impact Residential), Stephanie Prestol (HIP), Sandy Washington (Lifestyles of Maryland), Jerry Joseph (consultant), Garrett Swain (Standard Communities), Amanda Chesney (Catholic Charities), Danielle Conroy (MBIA), and Nevery Barry (Chamber of Commerce) all expressed strong support for the projects. Many highlighted the need for workforce housing and the critical role PILOTs play in project feasibility.
  • Requests for Additional Projects: Scott Link, Jessica Zuniga, and Sharon Cox expressed disappointment that Eagle Point Phase 2 was not among the recommended projects and requested its consideration.
  • Fiscal Impact Concerns: Tina Wilson (resident) voiced support but noted the $7.8 million in foregone property tax revenue over the 20-year term of the PILOTs.
  • Written Comments: The Clerk noted that six written comments were received in support of the projects, three in opposition, and one neutral.

Discussion Items

  • Commissioner Stewart asked about adding the fourth project (Eagle Point Phase 2) to the approval. Staff explained it could not be added that night without violating the public hearing notice, but it could be prioritized in the next annual NOFA round.
  • Staff clarified the scoring matrix, noting the fourth project had the lowest score.

Key Outcomes

  • The Board voted unanimously to approve PILOT agreements for Eagle Point Phase 1, Lendville Crossing, and Pineway Village.
  • The public hearing and record were closed.

Public Hearing on 2026 Local Legislative Proposals

Acting Deputy County Administrator Danielle Mitchell presented the process for the 21 submitted proposals. Residents were given three minutes to present their proposed additions, deletions, or modifications to the Charles County Code.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • John Abdilodin (Assistant Clerk) proposed dissolving the inactive Heritage Commission, noting it has been defunct for over 20 years.
  • Jeff Mank (resident) proposed an 80% meeting attendance requirement for commissioners with penalties including forfeiture of pay and office.
  • Deborah Jones (Port Tobacco) proposed mandatory public disclosure of investigations into commissioner conduct, with a retroactive clause to 2018.
  • Derek Terry (Waldorf) proposed a residential traffic calming partnership program to allow HOAs to request speed cushions or humps.
  • Eileen Britt (HOA Alliance) presented four proposals: eliminating the Planning and Design Review Board (PDRB); registering and maintaining vacant commercial properties; requiring a one-year warranty for infrastructure transferred to HOAs; and requiring long-term maintenance plans and funding for HOAs in new subdivisions.
  • Latina Wilson (resident) presented six proposals: strengthening agritourism policy; improving development codes for long-term value; requiring commissioner compliance with DEI policies; commissioner attendance standards; mandatory ethics training for elected officials; and establishing an independent ethics auditor.
  • Jessica Cassidy (Port Tobacco) proposed an eight-year moratorium on hyperscale data centers to allow study of environmental and health impacts.
  • Mikhail Lloyd (Waldorf) proposed quarterly joint accountability workshops for planning and economic development departments, a ban on NDAs for tech deals, a ban on data centers, and an economic development task force focused on racial equity.
  • Lana Davis (Charles County Against Data Centers Coalition) opposed data centers and called for a task force with a moratorium, citing the Potomac River being named the most endangered river of 2026.
  • Joseph Mank (District 4) supported commissioner attendance rules, PDRB reform, traffic calming, and a tight moratorium on data centers while proper zoning language is developed.
  • Stacey Lane (Republican Women of Charles County) proposed an Expert Advisory Accountability and Transparency Act. Staff noted the proposal was not submitted by the March deadline and could not be formally heard.

Discussion Items

  • Commissioner Stewart requested legal review of the feasibility of the forfeiture of office clause in Mr. Mank's attendance proposal and the retroactivity clause in Ms. Jones' investigations proposal.
  • The County Attorney noted the Inspector General (IG) legislation might cover aspects of Ms. Jones' proposal regarding investigations.
  • Staff noted the PDRB was already being reviewed for changes, so outright elimination might not be required.
  • Commissioner Patterson noted a moratorium on data centers was not strictly necessary as no ZTA enabling them currently exists, but it could be considered for a short duration if needed.

Key Outcomes

  • The public hearing and record for the 2026 Local Legislative Proposals were closed.
  • A follow-up work session for commissioners to further discuss the proposals was scheduled for May 5th or May 12th.
  • The meeting was adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

Charles County Government presents the Board of Commissioners. Good evening, Commissioners. We're going to begin this evening's session with a roll call. Commissioner Bowling. Present. Commissioner Coates. Commissioner Stewart. Commissioner Patterson. Present. And Commissioner Collins. Commissioner Collins. Thank you. Commissioners, the next item on your agenda is your first public hearing for this evening. Commissioner Collins, if you want to read the statement. Good afternoon, everyone. The purpose of this evening's session is to hold a public hearing on pilot work group summary of projects for funding consideration. If it pleases the commissioners, I will dispense with the reading of the public notice. For the public, when it's your turn to speak, please state your name and address clearly for the record. Statement should relate to the subject matter of this identified hearing. Statement should be brief to the point and limited to three minutes or less. Proper language is required at all times. Additionally, please understand that this is a public hearing, which means that this is the commissioner's opportunity to hear directly from the public. This is the public's opportunity to speak. Consequently, the commissioners will not be entertaining questions or debating the issue. The commissioners do reserve the right to extend the time frame or to continue the hearing until another date. With that stated, we will now begin the public hearing. Good evening, Commissioners. Dina Barclay, Director of Community Services. And just to introduce my colleagues here, Joel Binkley sitting next to me, planning supervisor, planning growth management. Mark Thompson, Chief of Commercial Development for Economic Development, and Jake Dyer, Director of Fiscal and Administrative Services. So as you recall, we're coming back to you today for the public hearing portion of our process in the pilot agreement for affordable housing. And I do want to be transparent that both of the developers who submitted projects are with us here this evening. PAX development and impact development. And if they signed up to speak, they will not be presenting. They're just going to get the same three minutes as the public as well. So did want to let you know that they were available tonight. So the first slide, it basically is what is affordable housing. Some of this may look familiar to you. We repurposing some of our slides from our previous presentation to you. But this is the definition of affordable housing that we used in our work group, providing critical economic stability, improved health outcomes, and better educational opportunities for residents while fostering stronger, more productive communities. Affordable housing reduces financial strain, allowing households to afford necessities like food and health care, decreasing homelessness and supporting local economies through job creation and increased consumer spending. So when folks have more disposable income by reducing their housing costs, they have more income to spend on other things, necessities as well as community activities and amenities for themselves. The affordable housing shortage key impact. Oh, is that your slide? I'm sorry. Yes, I keep it. I'm going to keep reading this one because I would have started. The key impacts for affordable housing shortage, uh lower increases excuse me, has lower levels of discretionary household income, uh, lower levels of business investment, and lower economic well-being. Thank you again, Commissioners, um, for your time today on this important topic.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com