Chesapeake City Council June 17, 2025: VNG Compressor Station Denied, Data Center Denied, Text Amendments Approved
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Chesapeake City Council Regular Meeting – June 17, 2025
The Chesapeake City Council held a regular meeting on June 17, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chamber. Prior to the meeting, a work session at 4:30 p.m. discussed the Chesapeake/Suffolk Boundary Line and the Greenbrier Area Plan. The regular meeting addressed several planning public hearing items, including two major contested rezoning proposals, conditional use permits, and zoning text amendments. Mayor Richard W. West was excused. Vice Mayor John M. de Triquet presided.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of proposed agenda and minutes (unanimous, 8-0).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item A (VNG Compressor Station): Eight speakers opposed the continuance request, citing health and safety concerns, air pollution (Chesapeake ranked 5th in state for air pollution), and proximity to residential areas (Portlock, Crestwood, Eva Gardens, Sturbridge Village, MacMillan). Speakers: David Parson, Sarah Williams, Joseph Davis, Cheryl Davis, Nicole Stickles, Vic Nicholls, Dr. George Reed, Joyce Hampton. All urged denial.
- Item B (Etheridge Lakes Data Center): Approximately 40 speakers. One speaker (John Padgett, applicant) supported continuance. Several speakers (Donald Fox, Lee Damore, Betsy Ainspac, Lawrence Neiditz, Steve Cowan) had comments. 32 speakers opposed, raising concerns about noise, low-frequency vibrations, health effects, property values, water usage (300,000 gallons per day), power grid strain (200 MW = 100,000 homes), and compatibility with Fentress Overlay District. Some supported continuance for more information; many urged immediate denial. Notable: comments about developer's past (federal bank fraud conviction), lack of community engagement, and inconsistency with zoning.
Discussion Items
- Work Session (4:30 p.m.):
- Chesapeake/Suffolk Boundary Line: Presentation by Deputy City Manager Brian Solis. Formalizing working boundary along Pewsville line. 12 undeveloped parcels (value ~$400,000) will transfer to Suffolk. Process includes cost-sharing agreement, public engagement, survey, and legal steps. Timeline: first quarter 2026.
- Greenbrier Area Plan: Planning Director James McNamara presented. Study area >12 sq mi. Public engagement: thousands of survey responses, four community meetings. Vision: vibrant mixed-use community with diverse housing, transportation, open space. Five transformation districts: Health Village, Greenbrier Recreation District, Central Greenbrier District, Regional Hub (Greenbrier Mall), Conference District. Design guidelines, circulation plan, open space plan. Implementation tools: TIF, TDR, CDA, etc. Discussion on TDR program, heights (up to 145 ft at Regional Hub, 85 ft in Central Greenbrier), housing variety (no single-family detached). Councilmember Ritter expressed concern about past plan implementation (Dominion Boulevard plan) and need for TDR before adoption.
- Regular Meeting:
- Item A (VNG Compressor Station): Request for continuance to July 15, 2025. Motion to continue failed 4-4. Then motion to deny passed 5-3 (yes: de Triquet, King, Newins, Smith, Ward; no: Bunn, Ritter, Whitaker). Project: natural gas compressor station on ~23.2 acres at 2512 S Military Highway, replacing propane storage. Staff and Planning Commission had recommended approval.
- Item B (Etheridge Lakes Data Center): Request for continuance to August 19, 2025. Councilmember King moved to deny continuance, seconded by Ward. Substitute motion to deny the rezoning itself made by Newins, seconded by King. After discussion, substitute motion to deny the rezoning passed 7-0 (Whitaker abstained due to conflict of interest). Project: data center on ~22.6 acres at Centerville Turnpike and Etheridge Manor Boulevard. Planning Commission had recommended denial; staff recommended approval with proffers.
- Item C (Triumph International Ministries): Conditional use permit for church/worship center at 2711 Campostella Road. Unanimously approved with stipulations.
- Item D (Great Bridge Pumpkin Patch): Seasonal outdoor recreational facility at 1448 Battlefield Blvd S. Unanimously approved with stipulations, including alternative parking and access.
- Item E (Euphoric Moments Event Venue): Event space and church at 211 Providence Rd, Suite 7. Approved 7-1 (Newins voted no).
- Item F (Text Amendment – Alcohol/Substance Abuse Facilities): Ordinance amending zoning for alcohol and substance abuse facilities. Approved 8-0 (version dated April 21, 2025).
- Item G (Text Amendment – Fentress Overlay Signs): Ordinance amending sign regulations in Fentress Overlay District. Approved 8-0 with amendment (maximum freestanding sign height reduced to 6 ft).
- Unfinished Business: Councilmember Whitaker requested initiating resolution to align zoning ordinance with South Norfolk Design Guidelines. Unanimously approved.
- New Business: Time extension for Hampton Roads Integrated BioEnergy Complex CUP to July 16, 2026. Approved 8-0.
Key Outcomes
- VNG Compressor Station (PLN-REZ-2024-019): Denied by a 5-3 vote after a tie on the continuance motion. The project was a conditional rezoning to M-1 for a compressor station.
- Etheridge Lakes Data Center (PLN-REZ-2025-002): Denied by a 7-0 vote (1 abstention). The Planning Commission had recommended denial. Staff had recommended approval with 19 proffers.
- Conditional Use Permits: Triumph International Ministries (approved unanimously), Great Bridge Pumpkin Patch (approved unanimously), Euphoric Moments Event Venue (approved 7-1).
- Zoning Text Amendments: Both ordinances approved (8-0), with the sign ordinance amended to lower freestanding sign height.
- Initiating Resolution: Directed staff to align zoning with South Norfolk Design Guidelines (8-0).
- Time Extension: BioEnergy Complex CUP extended to July 16, 2026 (8-0).
- Work Session: Next steps for boundary line and Greenbrier Area Plan adoption (scheduled for July 15, 2025).
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everyone. June 17th, City Council work session is in session right now. And uh, Mr. Manager, I believe we have two items for consideration. I'll turn it over to you. Yes, yes. Yes, sir. Thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor. And I will turn it over immediately to Deputy City Manager Brian Solis to go over item one, which is Chesapeake Suffolk City boundary uh along the Pewesville line. Good afternoon, Mr. Vice Mayor, members of council, Mr. Manager. My pleasure to be before you uh today to talk about a uh a topic that has kind of been uh out there in the community for some time, um, and that is the uh formalizing the uh boundary in the north uh western part of the city in the Pewesville community uh with the City of Suffolk. Um I'd like to welcome Deputy City Manager Kevin Hughes, who is uh with us from Suffolk uh in support of this initiative. Uh Mr. Hughes is the lead um for Suffolk's part in um working through this initiative. So I want to thank him for being uh here today. So our main objective in this process is to formalize what we call a working boundary, a boundary that's already in place uh today, in effect that's already in uh place today, and I'll I'll explain that. But um uh the main objective is to do so in a way that has uh the least effect on existing residents and businesses um as possible. And um also with us today are a number of city staff, including your real estate assessor, uh deputy director of public works, Sam Sowan, uh Jimmy McDemair with the playing department, and um there's a number of other uh staff that either um will be involved or have been involved so far to get us to this point. Of course, um a main player in that is your city attorney, Catherine Lindley. Um then public communication standpoint will help us uh get the word out on this on this process um as we go into some community engagement. So if you look at the the exhibit there that was created cooperatively with the cities of Chesapeake and Suffolk, um you see kind of a stair step boundary. And if you were to look at a map, even the old ADC maps, you would kind of see a what I call it as the ProFlies buffer that has been mapped over the years. This stair step boundary, the blue line is what's most important. And how that working boundary has been created over the years has generally been um an agreement between the real estate assessor for Chesapeake and the real estate assessor, the previous ones and existing ones, and um and the real estate assessor for Suffolk. And they kind of agreed that, hey, this boundary kind of crosses the one that has been mapped. Uh it bisects a lot of properties, there's no rhyme or reason to it. So over time, over decades, they have effectively agreed on which parcels are assessed in Chesapeake and which are assessed in Suffolk. And what this map generally does is formalizes that agreement. However, if you look at the insets on the right hand side of near the Suffolk City logo there, there are about a dozen lots that, because of the trajectory of the line, just makes sense to go over to Suffolk. And but a key part of information with this is that they're all undeveloped, they're all wooded, and for the most part, they front on what we call paper streets. So those are streets that are platted but are not uh developed as roadways yet. So in effect, there's a dozen parcels that uh will change from tax map parcels in Chesapeake to Suffolk. Again, um residents or businesses involved, consequently, no students or voters involved as well. So the cumulative value of those 12 parcels is about 400 uh thousand dollars. Um of the activities that we're um taking on to effectuate this this boundary are we're briefing you today. Uh tomorrow, Mr. Hughes will will brief the um Suffolk City Council, and I'll go over there in support of that briefing. Um your first action item will be next Tuesday for you to consider a cost sharing agreement for the city manager to uh sign that basically allows the cities of Suffolk and Chesapeake to work together in the same corridor, some professional services they may need, including surveying legal costs, advertising for mailings and things of that nature. That will just be an instrument to allow that cooperation to take place. Um our public communications folks have been working with our um city departments to develop frequently asked questions for a variety of office um audiences that may have questions about what are the cities doing with this city boundary, what is this all about? Um, and so a way to answer those questions. And then the City of Suffolk has created an online mapping tool tool, it's very uh user-friendly. You can put in your address and see the city boundary relative to your address, and you can zoom out, zoom in, and um it's it's a very user-friendly piece. And with this briefing and those pieces of information, uh, we are looking to both cities publish a web page on the city, Chesapeake, City of Suffolk boundary, very simple web page that has that information and also some next opportunities to get involved. And by that I mean uh we are looking to um hold community engagement open houses, one in Suffolk and one in Chesapeake in the September time frame. In the meantime, um during the summer, land surveyors, the community, you know, residents and businesses may see land surveyors out in the field, you know, they survey with flags and and other uh stakes to establish that boundary, survey it and put um that surveying information to legal instruments to um to record. Um during that time um the city real estate assessors for Chesapeake and Suffolk will get together and address any back taxes for the 12 parcels that will be conveyed from Chesapeake to Suffolk.
openpublica.com