OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Chesapeake, Virginia/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Chesapeake City Council Meeting — October 13, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyChesapeake, Virginia
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:52:54

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

You know, does it turn into a dumping ground that Earl's people will have to clean up because it's not used?

0:06

Will it create traffic that then has to exit onto existing streets that may not be able to handle it?

0:12

So building it in pieces is necessary, but it does require the thought and the timing of how you implement each individual piece.

Speaker 2

0:24

So the manager alluded to it earlier, but our transportation network is largely oriented north-south.

0:30

So, you know, we we have 17 and Dominion Boulevard, uh one Battlefield Boulevard and the Expressway, uh, Greenbar Parkway, and to a lesser extent, uh Centerville Turnpike all carrying traffic north-south, you know, uh, you know, moving Chesapeake residents as well as northeastern North Carolina up to the interstate system and to the rest of the region.

0:52

Uh we do have some connectivity in the northern half of the city uh with uh military highway, but in the southern half of the city, there's virtually no uh good east-west connectivity.

1:04

And I'll I'll give you an example.

1:05

So uh it's probably been 15 years or more now, but uh one Saturday during the summer we had a tanker truck uh turnover on uh local uh battlefield boulevard just south of the entrance to the expressway.

1:20

That shut down all uh north uh south traffic on Battlefield and and uh 168 Expressway, it uh required all of that traffic to be detoured uh either down Benefit Road or Ballahack Road, and those are the two uh green alignments shown uh on the map, the the two southernmost ones.

1:40

It it wreaked havoc on our uh network that day.

1:44

So a lot some of the improvements that we're looking for aren't necessarily needed on an everyday basis for everyday capacity, but they are needed for additional resiliency uh to to respond in emergency situations, and and that is a very good example of uh you know when that capacity is is much needed.

2:04

You know, anybody that's driven those roads uh you know that you know that they're narrow, they're windy, they're just not designed for that kind of traffic.

2:12

But uh we do call for both of those facilities to ultimately uh be improved to four-lane uh divided roadways.

2:23

And uh and so this is the trails map.

2:27

So again, I won't spend a lot of time on this other than to say this is another companion document to the master transportation plan.

2:33

And similarly, uh you know, we we have a lot of needs uh and this plan uh also serves as the blueprint for future investments, uh, both to the capital process and to the development process uh, you know, for for uh non-motorized transportation.

Speaker 1

2:54

Okay, so as Earl mentioned, there's a number of of obstacles or issues and challenges for existing roads.

3:02

He mentioned the windy road issue.

3:04

Um that can create issues, it can increase the frequency of interruption, and it can also increase the expense and viability as an alternative access.

3:14

Um flooding in Chesapeake is somewhat frequent because we're affected by abnormal rains, but we're also affected by various tidal conditions.

3:25

And another title or another drainage issue is because we have so many earthen ditches, a lot of times we run into a failure as a result of things that we don't even know are a problem until there's an incident.

3:38

Um that picture on your right is one of Cedar Road.

3:42

There's two locations on Cedar Road that are both susceptible to tidal influence and periodically are inundated and unpassable.

3:50

And unlike Battlefield Boulevard having the alternative of the bypass, they basically, in some sections, they might have Bells Mill Road, but for the most part, there's really not alternatives in the location of these um locations that flood.

Unassigned speaker

4:05

The next slide doesn't exist, just talk about it.

Unassigned speaker

4:09

That one doesn't exist.

Unassigned speaker

4:10

Okay.

Speaker 1

4:12

Okay.

4:13

So the other thing that I would point out on Cedar Road is there's a number of important facilities that are utilities, both franchise utilities gas lines and water lines and so forth.

4:25

And on Cedar Road in particular, we've had multiple issues where that major gas line has had leaks and they've even had to evacuate adjoining properties and close the road, and when they do that, it's just we're closing it now.

4:39

There's no advanced notice, and if you don't have that resiliency, it can create a lot of headaches.

4:46

Um here's some of the things we're talking about interruption, but resiliency also helps you bridge the lack of capacity.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So in the case again of Mount Pleasant Road, capacity was a problem, but it wasn't like an insurmountable problem at the time that had to be instantly fixed.

Speaker 1

5:06

And as a result of that other project coming on that provided resiliency, it was able to provide relief.

5:12

And but it it happened on a slow period.

5:15

In the case of, for instance, Cedar Road, which is the east-west on the west side of battlefield.

5:22

Um, in the event we don't eventually develop some resiliency in a very short time, we would have to be looking at do we six lane battle um Cedar Road and the expense that comes along with that when there's been so many properties that have developed along that route.

5:41

Um we talked about the interruptions, the public utilities, so public utilities can create the need to close the road if there's a problem, but it also they have the same problems with resiliency that we do.

5:54

If there's a water line problem on Cedar Road, there's not many other water lines that are parallel.

5:59

So as you build roadways, you build utilities, and all your infrastructure will become more resilient.

6:08

Um this is the master transportation plan.

6:10

We're talking about the grass field area.

6:13

If you look at that um what's that shape?

6:16

Is that an ellipse?

6:18

Okay.

6:19

Anyway, the the vertical oval.

6:21

If you look in that area, you'll see there's only one east-west route that goes through that area that exists today, and that is Cedar Road.

6:31

And again, on the west on the east side of 168, we have more resiliency by having a parallel arterial.

6:43

Okay.

6:44

So there is a development before us, and you know, one of the first things we identified when this property was in need of development was it lied in the pat it lied in the path of an important east-west planned roadway on the master transportation plan.

7:04

And I want to say it was about 2003 that the first piece of scenic parkway was constructed from Dominion Boulevard heading south.

7:13

And this developer recognized that it was on the master transportation plan and actually proffered to do the connection from the west side of their property to the east side of their property, and the city reviewed that proposal, and naturally we were um.

7:35

Naturally, we were pleased to see the proposal of completing such an important link.

7:41

It's actually about 1.7 miles long, which is a significant length of roadway.

7:47

If we own the land, we would have probably been looking at about a 20 million dollar improvement to complete that stretch of roadway.

7:54

And of course, we probably wouldn't have had that as a transportation priority, but eventually it would be needed.

8:02

Um they proposed it, they offered to build it right up front.

8:09

Next slide.

8:12

And what we did, and I talked about phasing earlier.

8:15

Do you want to just build a road and then turn it loose and say, well, we'll see what happens.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Transportation Safety███████████████████████████████31%
Procedural█████████████████████21%
Public Works████████8%
Public Engagement████████8%
Public Safety████████8%
Education██████6%
Land Use and Zoning████4%
Economic Development███3%
Traffic Management███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Chesapeake City Council Meeting — October 13, 2026

The Chesapeake City Council convened at 6:30 p.m. on October 13, 2026, in the City Hall Council Chamber, following a 4:00 p.m. closed meeting for boards and commissions interviews and a 5:00 p.m. work session on the Master Transportation Plan. The council certified the earlier closed meeting, approved the agenda and consent items, heard citizen comments, and adjourned at 8:10 p.m.

Work Session: Master Transportation Plan

  • Staff presented on Dominion Boulevard and Parker Road/Scenic Parkway. They said the city’s transportation network is largely oriented north-south and lacks east-west connectivity, creating resiliency problems when major routes close. A tanker-truck closure on Battlefield Boulevard requiring detours onto Benefit and Ballahack roads was cited as an example.
  • Staff cited flooding and utility-line failures on Cedar Road, noting Cedar Road is frequently the only east-west route in the Grassfield area and has limited parallel alternatives.
  • For Grasslands, staff said the developer proffered to build about 1.7 miles of Scenic Parkway, an improvement estimated to cost about $20 million if built by the city. Staff recommended phasing the connection and studying secondary effects, including Parker Road impacts, before allowing regular traffic to use it. The two narrow Parker Road stretches are already under design, with projected completion in fall 2028.
  • For Springton and Dominion Boulevard, staff explained that the VDOT limited-access line requires Commonwealth Transportation Board approval for new access points. VDOT recommended a continuous green T, but staff preferred aligning with the existing 2003 access management plan and the existing Eagle Parkway access, which would avoid CTB action and preserve access for future development north of Dominion.
  • Vice Mayor Ritter asked for a staff priority list of connections, recommended updating the 30-year-old level-of-service policy, and noted the Mount Pleasant Road third-lane project saved over $50 million compared with a four-lane divided roadway. Council also asked that project planning consider neighborhood character, chronic flooding areas, and fire-department connectivity needs.

Presentations

  • Stephen Wright, economic development director, presented a Certificate of Recognition to MEB General Contractors, Inc. MEB, based in Chesapeake since 1982, achieved Virginia BEST Level 3, the Virginia Department of Labor’s highest recognition, and is one of only two or three companies in Virginia to receive it. Safety coordinator Cody Schuyler said protecting employees is the company’s top priority.
  • Wright and Chris Crouch, chairman of the Chesapeake Education Foundation, highlighted the 26th annual Business Appreciation Golf Tournament, which has raised well over $150,000 for local charities over the years. A check for $14,009.58 was presented to the Chesapeake Education Foundation for the Jared Cotton Career Scholar Scholarship, supporting one student from each high school.
  • Mayor West and Vice Mayor Ritter honored Councilmember Ella Ward with roses and a certificate for 20 years of service on the City Council. Ward said she has six council meetings remaining before retiring at the end of the year.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent agenda was approved 9-0 with City Manager Item 3 removed by Vice Mayor Ritter; the motion was made by Councilmember Newins and seconded by Councilmember Ward.
  • Approved items included acknowledgements for six rezoning/PUD requests scheduled for Planning Commission on November 12, 2026: Riverwood Glen, Stockton Meadows, Oakmere Village, Schlueb Rezoning, Beechwoods, and Grasslands.
  • Other consent items included resignations of Marcella Davis and Kevin Walker; a refund of $11,390.34 to Waste Management of Virginia; acceptance of $12,000 from the Beazley Foundation for the Fire Department’s Explorer’s Post Program; donation of a decommissioned 2012 Pierce Quantum Telesquirt to Castlewood Fire and Rescue, Inc.; the fourth amendment to the FY2026/FY2027 Community Services Performance Contract with the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services; and the annual delinquent and uncollectible tax list submission.
  • City Manager Item 3, a resolution donating the police department’s 2004 Safe Boat to the Port of Virginia, was then approved separately 9-0. The city manager said the Port of Virginia had helped the city acquire the boat and that the donation would keep it in the regional public-safety fleet. Councilmembers Newins and Jefferies made personal-interest disclosures related to fire and police department employment before participating.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Agenda-item commenter Eric Zentz, a Cheshire Forest resident, asked the council to delay approval of the Grasslands project until an adequate traffic flow, safety, and environmental noise study was completed. He said traffic through Cheshire Forest would more than double, that the community should be included in the traffic evaluation, and that the risk assessment should occur before the council votes.
  • Agenda-item commenter Vic Nichols opposed City Manager Item 3 and the $45,000 EVMS appropriation, questioned the proposed rules amendments giving the mayor additional power, and asked that school funding be tied to accountability.
  • Shannon Stafford asked the council to consider regulating holiday inflatables. She described four 12-foot inflatables displayed in a neighboring cul-de-sac from October through February, noted existing zoning limits fences to four feet but not inflatable height, size, or number, and said the display affects property value and enjoyment.
  • Drew Vakos, representing Dragas Associates, requested concurrent advertising for the Beechwoods Planned Unit Development, citing contract deadlines tied to land acquisition. He described the project as a mixed-use community with neighborhood commercial space and reasonably priced attached homes. The city manager said staff does not take a position on concurrent advertising, but noted staff is likely to recommend denial at this point while acknowledging timeliness issues with the traffic impact study.
  • Vic Nichols spoke about Greenbrier traffic, thanking staff for signal timing changes on Eden Way North and Volvo Parkway, and called for fixing the Greenbrier/Jarman intersection and adding capacity to the I-64 West on-ramp before Costco opens next year.
  • Michael Soras, president of the North Battlefield Civic League representing about 13 neighborhoods and 5,000 residents, said traffic in Essex Meadows remains out of control, asked for relief on Volvo Parkway and Battlefield Boulevard, and said residents will continue pressing the council.
  • Vanessa Butler asked the city to repair head walls and culverts on West Road during the water and sewer line project. She opposed a concrete driveway apron and requested either gravel, a rental car, or a city vehicle if her driveway is unusable during the three-day cure period.
  • The city manager said staff would review the comments, that Greenbrier east-west connections are being accelerated in the spring capital budget, and that for Grasslands/Parker Road, staff is considering not making the Scenic Parkway connection for general traffic until more community input and improvements are completed.

Discussion Items

  • The council approved a $45,000 appropriation from the High-Priority One-Time Account to Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) by a 9-0 vote. Councilmember King disclosed that he is an unpaid EVMS Board of Trustees member and described EVMS’s uncompensated care for Chesapeake patients. Councilmember Newins noted the city’s annual contribution had been reduced by about 50%.
  • The council approved four FY2027 Capital Improvement Program amendments for Chesapeake Public Schools, each by 9-0 votes:
    • $6,500,000 for a new Turf Field and Track Upgrades project.
    • $1,000,000 in federal funding for the Chesapeake Career Center Replacement Project.
    • $1,000,000 for School Emergency Communications and Physical Security Improvements, funding security vestibules at three elementary schools.
    • $2,532,611 for Non-Routine Renewal and Replacement Projects II for major maintenance and repairs at school facilities.
  • The Boards and Commissions Interview Policy Amendment was approved 9-0. Vice Mayor Ritter clarified that it removes the South Norfolk Revitalization Commission from the interview-board list.
  • The City Council Rules of Order and Procedure amendments were approved 9-0. The city attorney summarized the changes: a new mayor-led pre-motion discussion process; alignment with a new state FOIA requirement prohibiting final action on items not listed on the docket; and a written process for requesting continuances or withdrawals of advertised public hearing items, with notice to the city clerk and planning director by the Wednesday before the hearing so legal ads can be updated. Councilmember Smith asked about guaranteeing at least one continuance; the mayor said that could be considered at a future work session.
  • Under unfinished business, Councilmember King requested an update on the one-bin recycling program. Councilmember Smith also asked for a resolution supporting the Crestwood at Parkside precinct becoming whole; about 70–72 homes are affected. Vice Mayor Ritter suggested legal review and possible closed-session discussion, and Councilmember Smith said he had already asked the city manager and city attorney to look into it. No action was taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Certified the earlier closed meeting by a 9-0 vote and approved the proposed agenda without objection. The agenda listed Approval of Minutes, but neither the minutes nor the transcript records a separate vote on that item.
  • Approved the consent agenda, except City Manager Item 3, by a 9-0 vote; then approved City Manager Item 3 separately by a 9-0 vote.
  • Approved the EVMS appropriation and all four Chesapeake Public Schools CIP amendments, each by 9-0 votes.
  • Approved concurrent advertising for Beechwoods by a 9-0 vote, scheduling it for the Planning Commission on November 12, 2026, and City Council on November 17, 2026.
  • Approved the Boards and Commissions Interview Policy Amendment and the City Council Rules of Order and Procedure amendments, each by 9-0 votes.
  • Approved a motion to hold a closed meeting on Tuesday, October 20, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. to interview candidates for the Redevelopment Housing Authority, Planning Commission, and South Norfolk Revitalization Commission by a 9-0 vote.
  • Adjourned at 8:10 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

You know, does it turn into a dumping ground that Earl's people will have to clean up because it's not used? Will it create traffic that then has to exit onto existing streets that may not be able to handle it? So building it in pieces is necessary, but it does require the thought and the timing of how you implement each individual piece. So the manager alluded to it earlier, but our transportation network is largely oriented north-south. So, you know, we we have 17 and Dominion Boulevard, uh one Battlefield Boulevard and the Expressway, uh, Greenbar Parkway, and to a lesser extent, uh Centerville Turnpike all carrying traffic north-south, you know, uh, you know, moving Chesapeake residents as well as northeastern North Carolina up to the interstate system and to the rest of the region. Uh we do have some connectivity in the northern half of the city uh with uh military highway, but in the southern half of the city, there's virtually no uh good east-west connectivity. And I'll I'll give you an example. So uh it's probably been 15 years or more now, but uh one Saturday during the summer we had a tanker truck uh turnover on uh local uh battlefield boulevard just south of the entrance to the expressway. That shut down all uh north uh south traffic on Battlefield and and uh 168 Expressway, it uh required all of that traffic to be detoured uh either down Benefit Road or Ballahack Road, and those are the two uh green alignments shown uh on the map, the the two southernmost ones. It it wreaked havoc on our uh network that day. So a lot some of the improvements that we're looking for aren't necessarily needed on an everyday basis for everyday capacity, but they are needed for additional resiliency uh to to respond in emergency situations, and and that is a very good example of uh you know when that capacity is is much needed. You know, anybody that's driven those roads uh you know that you know that they're narrow, they're windy, they're just not designed for that kind of traffic. But uh we do call for both of those facilities to ultimately uh be improved to four-lane uh divided roadways. And uh and so this is the trails map. So again, I won't spend a lot of time on this other than to say this is another companion document to the master transportation plan. And similarly, uh you know, we we have a lot of needs uh and this plan uh also serves as the blueprint for future investments, uh, both to the capital process and to the development process uh, you know, for for uh non-motorized transportation. Okay, so as Earl mentioned, there's a number of of obstacles or issues and challenges for existing roads. He mentioned the windy road issue. Um that can create issues, it can increase the frequency of interruption, and it can also increase the expense and viability as an alternative access. Um flooding in Chesapeake is somewhat frequent because we're affected by abnormal rains, but we're also affected by various tidal conditions. And another title or another drainage issue is because we have so many earthen ditches, a lot of times we run into a failure as a result of things that we don't even know are a problem until there's an incident. Um that picture on your right is one of Cedar Road. There's two locations on Cedar Road that are both susceptible to tidal influence and periodically are inundated and unpassable. And unlike Battlefield Boulevard having the alternative of the bypass, they basically, in some sections, they might have Bells Mill Road, but for the most part, there's really not alternatives in the location of these um locations that flood. The next slide doesn't exist, just talk about it. That one doesn't exist. Okay. Okay. So the other thing that I would point out on Cedar Road is there's a number of important facilities that are utilities, both franchise utilities gas lines and water lines and so forth. And on Cedar Road in particular, we've had multiple issues where that major gas line has had leaks and they've even had to evacuate adjoining properties and close the road, and when they do that, it's just we're closing it now. There's no advanced notice, and if you don't have that resiliency, it can create a lot of headaches. Um here's some of the things we're talking about interruption, but resiliency also helps you bridge the lack of capacity. So in the case again of Mount Pleasant Road, capacity was a problem, but it wasn't like an insurmountable problem at the time that had to be instantly fixed. And as a result of that other project coming on that provided resiliency, it was able to provide relief. And but it it happened on a slow period. In the case of, for instance, Cedar Road, which is the east-west on the west side of battlefield. Um, in the event we don't eventually develop some resiliency in a very short time, we would have to be looking at do we six lane battle um Cedar Road and the expense that comes along with that when there's been so many properties that have developed along that route. Um we talked about the interruptions, the public utilities, so public utilities can create the need to close the road if there's a problem, but it also they have the same problems with resiliency that we do. If there's a water line problem on Cedar Road, there's not many other water lines that are parallel. So as you build roadways, you build utilities, and all your infrastructure will become more resilient. Um this is the master transportation plan. We're talking about the grass field area. If you look at that um what's that shape? Is that an ellipse? Okay. Anyway, the the vertical oval. If you look in that area, you'll see there's only one east-west route that goes through that area that exists today, and that is Cedar Road. And again, on the west on the east side of 168, we have more resiliency by having a parallel arterial. Okay. So there is a development before us, and you know, one of the first things we identified when this property was in need of development was it lied in the pat it lied in the path of an important east-west planned roadway on the master transportation plan.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com