Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Chesapeake City Council met on October 20, 2026, at 6:30 PM in City Hall Council Chamber to conduct a public hearing on 13 planning items, including rezoning requests, conditional use permits, and text amendments to the zoning ordinance. The meeting also included a closed session authorization and new business items. All votes were recorded, with several items passing by divided margins.
The Virginia General Assembly. The proposed text amendment ensures Chesapeake zoning organs complies with state law by meeting the minimum requirements of the Code of Virginia. Staff therefore recommends approval of the version dated, August 14th, 2026. No, sir. Motion is in order. Excuse me. Motion to approve PLN text 2026-002, version dated August 14, 2026. Retroactive to July 1, 2026, as presented, is adopted by an 8 to 1 vote. Thank you. Item L. PLN text 2026-003. Solar and battery energy storage system State Code updates. An order submending appendix A of the Chesapeake City Code and Title Zoning, Article 13, Section 2702 and 3200 to modify local regulation of solar and battery battery energy storage facilities as a result of recent changes to the Code of Virginia. Planning Commission recommends approval, version dated August 18, 2026. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions of the ordinance shall be retroactive to July 1, 2026. Mr. McNamara. The proposed text amendment is required to reflect statutory changes made by the Code of Virginia by the 2026 session of the Virginia General Assembly. Staff therefore recommends approval of Text Amendment version dated August 18, 2026. Thank you. Any speakers on this item? No, sir. Thank you. Motion, please. Councilman Smith. Move to approve. Thank you. Dr. Ward? Second. Discussion. I'm going to let Dr. Ward go ahead. She is not. She is not. Vice Mayor Ritter is recognized. Okay. It's an unusual circumstance when conscience, as opposed to the requirements of the Dillon's rule, have to take precedence with myself. This is the second and third time I have done this during my entire tenure on counsel. The first was what was in my opinion, anti-law enforcement legislation that my conscience would not allow me to approve of. In the last instance and in item L, we have been subjugated by Dillon's rule, where we this is robbing our citizens of their voice. This is mandating certain development requirements. It's mandating siting of battery storage, which, as people might remember, is something that neighbors do not choose to have in their neighborhood. I think that the State does this because they can.