The Chesapeake Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 11, 2023, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chamber, adjourning at 8:34 PM. The commission considered eight applications, including three consent items, three regular agenda items involving rezoning and conditional use permits, and a revocation of a conditional use permit. All votes were unanimous (9-0).
The planning commission pre-meeting for October 11th, 2023 is now in session. Welcome to our pre-meeting tonight, and thank you for taking part in the business of the city. First order of business is the agenda overview discussion. We have a total of eight applications, of which zero applications are for continuance or withdrawal. Mr. Boswick, would you please provide the commission with an overview of the applications? Good evening, Mr. Chairman and Commissioners. As each staff member will provide an update on the applications for you this evening. Thank you. I'm just following my script. I know that's a new one. The first item will be item one, Gray Farm. Mr. McKay, can you provide us with an update, please? Good evening, Commissioners. Um, I have no updates on this application, and uh, we've only received one uh public comment uh in opposition, that was from the Emperor's Executive Airport, which I'm sure you've seen the their long letter um in the in the staff report. Um so I'll be happy to answer any questions you have. Uh commissioners, are there any uh questions for the staff? Or first are there any conflicts which we require um abstentions? Any questions for staff? Um, I I I guess yeah, this may end up on on uh consent. So you you had no other uh the last time in a nearby neighborhood we had some significant citizen opposition. No, we didn't have any this time, no one called, no emails. Um I'm not aware of any opposition uh other than the airport. And the airport, that long letter, they wrote that originally for the Sykes Farm application, which is south of this, uh you know, south of the creek was much larger and closer um development. And then this one came through and they just sent the same letter because they're generally opposed to um residential development. But in this case, we differ in opinion uh then from them because we supported them in and denying the application on Sykes farm, because that's designated industrial in the comprehensive plan. But this piece is more or less just in fill of existing, you know, um residential development all around it, so it's really not protruding, you know, any closer to the airport than what's already there. Okay, great. And I don't see Mr. Tate here, but the the road extension, there's no issues with that. No, the thing is. Okay. All right, Commissioners. If there are no further questions, is there any objections to placing this on the consent agenda? If not, item one will be on consent. Next we have uh item number two and three together, the Arbors at Battlefield. Oh, Ms. Neal. Good evening, Commissioners. Uh, we've not heard anything from public, the public about this application, and I did want to provide um not an update, but just to clarify really quickly. Staff um you may have heard in the pre-meeting presentation that staff is recommending an indefinite continuance. That's not the case. We are simply seeking a continuance, recommending a continuance. Otherwise, a denial. Is there a length limitation that would be on such continuance when the applicant is not in concurrence? That is up to the um planning commission to decide, but ultimately it's a hundred days. I believe it's a hundred days. All right, thank you.