The Chesapeake Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 12, 2024, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, adjourning at 8:25 p.m. The commission considered nine items, including one continuance request, seven consent agenda items, and one regular public hearing item. Key outcomes included the indefinite continuance of a rezoning application and a 4–2 vote to approve the large-scale Springton at Grassfield planned unit development (PUD) against staff’s recommendation of denial.
Consent Items:
Regular Item – Springton at Grassfield (PLN-PUDC-2023-001):
Good evening, everybody. The planning commission pre-meeting for June twelfth is now in session. Welcome to the pre-meeting tonight. Thank you for taking part in the business of our city. First order of business tonight is the agenda overview discussion. We have a total of nine applications, of which one uh application is for continuance. And we have two applications, and Mr. Boswick will explain this in a minute that are being withdrawn. So, Mr. Boswick, would you please uh provide us with an overview of these applications? Yes, we have one request for a continuous evening that's PLN dash R E Zwegree. Now I have a lot of reserve with the applicant requesting and definitely continuous. And we also like to advise you that we do have two applications that are being withdrawn by the applicant. These items were continued indefinitely at your March nineteenth, March thirteenth meeting. So we just want to make you aware that they are being withdrawn and will not be back before you. And please note that no vote is necessary on these because it's an applicant's prerogative to withdraw their application. So that's what I have. All right, thank you very much. Uh commissioners, any comments or questions regarding these items. Okay. So uh at this point we will review the remaining items uh on our agenda and determine uh whether they're going to be on the consent agenda or the regular agenda. So first up, um Springton at Grassfield, uh Mr. Hobbs, please. Good evening. Uh we do not have any modifications to uh the application. We have had some comments, some citizen input, uh 10 that have been against the application and two that are in support. Uh the ten that are against in general as concerns about just development in general, losing the rule of character of the city that we shouldn't have development in this location, uh objections to multifamily elements that doesn't fit the area. Uh any concerns about the overall version of the city's infrastructure, namely roads and schools. Okay. Commissioners, conflicts with the application. Anybody have any questions for Mr. Hobbs or for staff? Discussion? All right, this will go on the regular agenda because it is being recommended for denial. Thank you, Mr. Hobbs. Thank you. Next up, uh item number two, McGee's concrete. Mr. McKay. We can't hear them at all. Hmm. Good evening. Um, yeah, I don't have any updates on this application, and we've had no citizen input. Thank you, Mr. McKay. Commissioners, any conflicts? Any questions for staff? Any discussion? Any objection to placing this on the consent agenda?