OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Chesapeake Planning Commission Public Hearing – September 9, 2026

Planning CommissionWednesday, September 9, 2026
BodyChesapeake, Virginia
SessionPlanning Commission
DateWednesday, September 9, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:59:43

Transcript — Verbatim
0:08

All right, the plan and commission pre-meeting for September 9th, 2026 is now in session.

0:27

All right.

0:27

There we go.

0:28

Okay, now the plan and commission pre-meeting for September 9th, 2026 is now in session.

0:33

Welcome to our pre-meeting.

0:35

Thank you for taking part in the business of our city.

0:37

The first order of business is the agenda overview discussion.

0:40

We have a total of 13 applications, of which none of them are for continuance or withdrawal.

0:48

Since there are no applications for continuance or withdrawal, we'll move to the next section of our pre-meeting agenda.

0:55

First item is item number one, Chesapeake Waterfront Concrete.

0:59

Mr.

0:59

Hannigan, do you have any updates regarding this application?

1:03

Hey, good evening, Commissioners.

1:05

Um I guess just the update on this one is as you guys are aware.

1:08

This was heard on June 10th, 2026 and was continued and then was also continued at the July 8th, 2026 hearing.

1:14

So in the meantime, the applicant has worked with the South Norfolk Reunion condominium condominium association to um answer some of their questions about the application.

1:24

Um other than that, there are no updates.

1:26

We've received three letters of opposition this go around and the previous two go arounds.

1:31

There was a combined 11 letters of opposition, so we're sitting about 14 right now.

1:37

Those are my updates.

1:38

All right.

1:39

Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application?

1:42

Do any commissioners have any questions for staff?

1:46

Is there any discussion?

1:52

Is there any objection to placing this item on the consent agenda?

1:58

All right.

1:59

Then we will place this on consent.

2:03

The next item is item number two, 1500 steel street container stacking.

2:09

Ms.

2:09

Peebles, do you have any updates regarding this application?

2:13

Good evening, Commissioners.

2:14

I have received no phone calls or inquiries about this application.

2:19

Thank you.

2:20

Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application?

2:24

Do any commissioners have questions for staff?

2:28

Is there any discussion?

2:31

Here and none, is there any objection of placing this item on the consent agenda?

2:37

All right.

2:38

Then for now we will put that on consent.

2:41

Next item is item number three, 2728 Battlefield LLC.

2:46

Ms.

2:46

Peoples, do you have any updates regarding this application?

2:48

I also have no updates on this application and have not received any phone calls, emails, or inquiries about it.

2:54

Thank you.

2:55

Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application?

2:58

Do any commissioners have any questions for staff?

3:02

Is there any discussion?

3:05

Hearing none, is there any objection to placing this item on the consent agenda?

3:10

All right.

3:13

Next item is item number four and number five.

3:16

Jerry Harris remodeling remodeling.

3:19

Mr.

3:19

Bell, do you have any updates regarding this application?

3:22

Good evening, commissioners.

3:24

Staff have no updates on this application.

3:26

We did receive one phone call just asking general information about the project and an email and support.

3:32

Thank you.

3:33

Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application?

3:37

Do any commissioners have questions for staff?

3:41

Is there any discussion?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use and Zoning█████████████████████████████████33%
Procedural████████████████████████████████32%
Public Safety███████7%
Noise Pollution█████5%
Transportation Safety█████5%
Public Engagement████4%
Neighborhood Concerns████4%
Traffic Management████4%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Chesapeake Planning Commission Public Hearing – September 9, 2026

The Chesapeake Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 9, 2026, beginning at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chamber. The meeting included a consent agenda with 10 items and three regular agenda items. All staff recommendations were for approval except where noted. Votes on contested items were recorded.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes: The August 12, 2026, meeting minutes were approved by unanimous consent.
  • PLN-USE-2025-009: Chesapeake Waterfront Concrete – conditional use permit for concrete crushing/recycling and a 170-foot height exception. Continued from June and July 2026. Three letters of opposition received in the latest round (total 14). Placed on consent.
  • PLN-USE-2025-049: 1500 Steel Street Container Stacking – conditional use permit for container stacking (max 5 high). No inquiries. Placed on consent.
  • PLN-REZ-2025-013: 2728 Battlefield LLC – rezoning of ~13.6 acres from A-1 to M-1 with proffers (use limits, buffers, right-of-way dedication, hours of operation 5am-6pm M-Sat, fire hydrant, etc.). No feedback. Placed on consent.
  • PLN-REZ-2026-003 & PLN-USE-2026-010: Jerry Harris Remodeling – rezoning of ~0.29 acres to B-5 and conditional use permit for outdoor storage. One call and one email of support. Placed on consent.
  • PLN-REZ-2026-005 & PLN-USE-2026-009: Battlefield Blvd Tattoo Parlor – rezoning from B-1 to B-2 and conditional use permit for tattoo parlor. Initially placed on consent, but Commissioner Taylor requested it be moved to regular agenda due to questions about cross-parking easement with Dairy Queen.
  • PLN-USE-2026-017: Debaun Self Storage – conditional use permit for self-storage facility. No inquiries. Placed on consent.
  • PLN-USE-CT-2026-003: St Brides Rd Communication Tower – conditional use permit for a 199-foot tower. Staff received 4-5 calls from neighbors asking about location; after explanation they were satisfied. Placed on consent initially, but later heard as a separate public hearing item following the regular agenda (see below).
  • PLN-TXT-2026-002: State Code Updates – text amendments for wireless facilities, manufactured housing, off-street parking, residential development on tax-exempt property, and small lot districts. No public comments. Placed on consent.
  • PLN-TXT-2026-003 & PLN-COMP-2026-003: Solar and Battery Energy Storage System State Code Updates – ordinance and comprehensive plan amendment. No comments. Placed on consent.

The consent agenda was adopted by a vote of 6-1. (Commissioner Bearfield dissented.)

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Consent Agenda Speakers:
    • On item 2 (1500 Steel Street): Rob Beaman spoke.
    • On item 3 (2728 Battlefield LLC): George Dillon spoke; Vic Nichols opposed, questioning the use of TDRs and the move of heavy equipment into the area.
    • On items 4&5 (Jerry Harris): Joseph King spoke (in support).
    • On item 9 (Debaun Self Storage): Jason C's spoke (in support); Vic Nichols opposed, citing traffic concerns on Military Highway and Greenbrier.
  • Item 1 (Chesapeake Waterfront Concrete):
    • James Leftwich (applicant attorney) spoke in support. He argued that the height exception is for a single grain elevator, not multiple structures; noise from crusher measured 60 decibels at 400 feet (line of sight), and with 500-foot setback and mature tree line, noise impact will be minimal. Dust control includes gravel, water suppression, and DEQ-permitted equipment.
    • Three speakers in support (applicants).
    • Shrika Steele (Reunion resident) opposed, citing concerns about dust, air quality, and lack of dust monitoring or wind shutdown procedures. She requested delay until a complete dust control plan is provided.
    • Kendra McFarland (Reunion) opposed, focusing on operating hours: applicant wants 7 days a week 6am-7pm; HOA requests M-F 8am-5pm with no weekends/holidays/evenings.
    • Brianna Taper (HOA president) opposed, listing unresolved concerns: no dust monitoring, no noise study, no vibration study, deferred stormwater details, and lack of enforceable conditions. She asked for denial or deferral until binding conditions are added.
    • Six additional residents registered in opposition (available for questions).
  • Items 6&7 (Battlefield Blvd Tattoo Parlor):
    • Vic Nichols spoke in support, suggesting more should be placed in Greenbrier.
    • Gary Bates (adjacent resident) opposed, arguing the location is too close to family-oriented Dairy Queen; he fears the area will decline.
    • Three speakers registered in support or available for questions.
  • Item 8 (Gratitude Farms Venue):
    • Sam Barrack (agent) spoke in support, describing the agritourism project with significant limitations on large events (4 events >250 people per year, 24 events 50-250, under 50 unlimited). Applicant’s home is on the 89-acre farm.
    • Rebecca and Hugh Miller (applicants) spoke emotionally about their vision, commitment to safety, and neighbor meeting.
    • 24 speakers in opposition, including:
      • Julie Hubbard: cited contradictions, neighbor petition: 161 of 162 opposed, questioned agritourism label and residency claims.
      • Grady Heppard: concerned about traffic, impaired driving, noise, and change to rural character.
      • Warren Zig: infrastructure concerns, fire response, narrow road.
      • Amy Heck (adjacent): strong opposition, described her experience moving to rural area for peace, worry about traffic, noise, emergency access, and property values.
      • Leah McDonald: requested enforceable traffic/parking control and safety conditions.
      • Don Trojan: road is too narrow for event traffic; water issues (wells).
      • DJ Kaiser: said location is not appropriate.
      • Charlene Hubler: boundary and buffer concerns.
      • Bobby & Kim Stanley: adjacent landowners who put their building plans on hold due to uncertainty.
      • Kelly Jordan: frequency of events (28 events >50 people per year = more than half the weeks of the year) and lack of lighting plan.
      • Neil Rosier: quoted applicant’s own comments ("albatross", "I do not need anyone's approval").
      • Lisa Abbott, Rebecca Shed, Jason Gish, Deborah Quidley, Zach Quidley, Don Carroll, Melissa Chambley, Cade Miller, Amber Kidd, Emily Ansel, Terra Noble, Lelly Pond – all raised similar points about traffic, noise, alcohol, safety, and incompatibility with rural character.
    • One speaker in support (Sam Barrack), plus applicant themselves.
  • Item 10 (St Brides Rd Communication Tower):
    • Three speakers in opposition:
      • First speaker (name not given): objecting to tower in new Heritage Park; felt it was slipped under radar.
      • Vic Nichols: opposed on Fourth Amendment grounds, arguing towers are for Flock surveillance cameras.
      • Amy Heck: said cell signals are fine, tower unnecessary; urged keeping the area green.

Discussion Items

  • Item 1 (Chesapeake Waterfront Concrete):
    • Commissioners questioned applicant about dust control (no baghouse, but water suppression; no wind shutdown deemed necessary), willingness to monitor dust (applicant agreed to consider intermittent monitoring).
    • Commissioner Howard noted the rigorous DEQ permit. Commissioner Secretary Malone asked about silica; applicant said no issue with cured concrete.
    • Commissioner Bearfield asked about similar operation in Portsmouth (less than 400 feet from property lines, no complaints; same hours).
  • Items 6&7 (Tattoo Parlor):
    • Commissioner Howard asked about parking requirements and cross-easement with Dairy Queen; Zoning Administrator Kemp confirmed one space per 200 sq ft and private easement.
  • Item 8 (Gratitude Farms):
    • Extensive discussion: Commissioner Howard asked transportation planner Tate about traffic analysis. Tate stated the road can marginally accommodate cars, accidents history not significant, level of service policy not applicable to use permits; capacity is sufficient but quality of ride reduced. Commissioner Howard also questioned fire protection; staff said fire code modification is required.
    • Vice Chair Squelia asked about traffic distribution; Tate estimated arrival of 200 cars over 30 minutes (car every 10-12 seconds) – not a gridlock.
    • Commissioner Taylor and Sproul disagreed based on personal experience of backups on St Brides Road and Taft Road.
    • Chairman asked Hugh Miller about indoor vs outdoor: Miller said only ceremony outdoors ("Here Comes the Bride"), all music indoors; cottages available for wedding party, staff on site during events.
    • Commissioner Bearfield disclosed that her family owns adjacent property but no conflict. She said she drove the area and believes the venue is misplaced.
    • Vice Chair Squelia expressed concern about 500-foot setback from neighbors vs 600 feet from applicant’s own home; vague future building; and applicant’s comment about neighbor shooting practices.
  • Item 10 (Communication Tower):
    • IT Director Harvey Miller explained tower is essential for public safety training academy (new police/fire/sheriff facility), smart city technologies (water meters, LoRaWAN), and private LTE for public safety. It is not for Flock cameras.
    • Commissioner Howard asked if tower is essential – Miller said absolutely.
    • Vice Chair Squelia raised surveillance concerns; staff noted zoning ordinance limits use; commission could stipulate but legal counsel advised stipulations must mitigate land use impacts. Ultimately commissioners supported the tower.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Approved 6-1 (motion by Vice Chair Squelia, second by Secretary Malone).
  • Item 1 – Chesapeake Waterfront Concrete (PLN-USE-2025-009): Approved with stipulations (5-2). Motion by Commissioner Taylor, second by Commissioner Howard. Commissioners Bearfield and one other dissented (likely Commissioner Halliard? but vote tally given as 5-2).
  • Items 6&7 – Battlefield Blvd Tattoo Parlor (PLN-REZ-2026-005 & PLN-USE-2026-009): Approved with proffers/stipulations (7-0). Motion by Vice Chair Squelia, second by Secretary Malone.
  • Item 8 – Gratitude Farms Venue (PLN-USE-2026-015): Recommended for denial (7-0). Motion by Vice Chair Squelia, second by Commissioner Sproul. The motion cited incompatibility with health, safety, and comfort of residents.
  • Item 10 – St Brides Rd Communication Tower (PLN-USE-CT-2026-003): Approved with stipulations (7-0). Motion by Commissioner Howard, second by Secretary Malone.
  • Cancellation: The September 23, 2026, Planning Commission meeting was canceled by unanimous consent due to no business.
  • Next Steps: Approved items will be heard by City Council next month (third or fourth Tuesday at 6:30 PM). The denied item (Gratitude Farms) will not proceed to Council unless appealed.

Meeting Transcript

All right, the plan and commission pre-meeting for September 9th, 2026 is now in session. All right. There we go. Okay, now the plan and commission pre-meeting for September 9th, 2026 is now in session. Welcome to our pre-meeting. Thank you for taking part in the business of our city. The first order of business is the agenda overview discussion. We have a total of 13 applications, of which none of them are for continuance or withdrawal. Since there are no applications for continuance or withdrawal, we'll move to the next section of our pre-meeting agenda. First item is item number one, Chesapeake Waterfront Concrete. Mr. Hannigan, do you have any updates regarding this application? Hey, good evening, Commissioners. Um I guess just the update on this one is as you guys are aware. This was heard on June 10th, 2026 and was continued and then was also continued at the July 8th, 2026 hearing. So in the meantime, the applicant has worked with the South Norfolk Reunion condominium condominium association to um answer some of their questions about the application. Um other than that, there are no updates. We've received three letters of opposition this go around and the previous two go arounds. There was a combined 11 letters of opposition, so we're sitting about 14 right now. Those are my updates. All right. Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application? Do any commissioners have any questions for staff? Is there any discussion? Is there any objection to placing this item on the consent agenda? All right. Then we will place this on consent. The next item is item number two, 1500 steel street container stacking. Ms. Peebles, do you have any updates regarding this application? Good evening, Commissioners. I have received no phone calls or inquiries about this application. Thank you. Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application? Do any commissioners have questions for staff? Is there any discussion? Here and none, is there any objection of placing this item on the consent agenda? All right. Then for now we will put that on consent. Next item is item number three, 2728 Battlefield LLC. Ms. Peoples, do you have any updates regarding this application? I also have no updates on this application and have not received any phone calls, emails, or inquiries about it. Thank you. Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application? Do any commissioners have any questions for staff? Is there any discussion? Hearing none, is there any objection to placing this item on the consent agenda? All right. Next item is item number four and number five.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com