Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Chesapeake Planning Commission held its public hearing on October 14, 2026, in the City Council Chamber. Commissioner Malone was excused. At the pre-meeting, staff reported no requests for continuance or withdrawal. Staff also reported five opposition comment forms and one support form for Carlton Park, three opposition comments for Reserve at Wexford, and two general-information phone calls for Tidewater Express. The Commission placed eight applications on the consent calendar and heard one regular item, Carlton Park. All nine applications were approved by 8-0 votes, and the September 9, 2026 minutes were approved by unanimous consent.
All right, the planning commission pre-meeting for October 14, 2026 is now in session. Welcome to our pre-meeting. And thank you for taking part in the business of our city. The first order of business is the agenda overview discussion. We have a total of nine applications, of which zero applications are for continuance or withdrawal. And since there are no applications for continuance or withdrawal, we will move to the next section, which is our pre-meeting agenda. First item is item number one, Carlton Park. Mr. Bell, do you have any updates regarding this application? Good evening, Commissioners. Staff have no updates on this application. We did receive five comment forms in opposition and one in support. Thank you. Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application? Do any commissioners have any questions for staff? Is there any discussion? Hearing none, is there any objection of placing this item on the consent agenda? All right. Then we will place item number one on consent at this time. Our next item is item number two, reserve at Wexford. Ms. Neal, do you have any updates regarding this application? No updates. We've received three comments. Um all opposed to the application. And those have all been emailed to you all. Thank you. Do any commissioners have any conflicts with this application? Do any commissioners have any questions for staff? Any discussion? Is hearing none? Is there any objection to placing this item on the consent agenda? All right, we will place it on the consent agenda. The next item are items number three and four, TI Water Express Incorporated. Ms. Hott, which I guess I guess you're gonna be handling Mr. I'm covering for Ms. Hot tonight. Okay, are there any updates regarding this application? Uh we have one update for you, and that is that the acreage in the staff report is a little bit different than what was advertised. Uh the rezoning consists of approximately 27 acres of M2 and 14 acres of C1. Um in this instance, acreage is not a required component of the legal advertisement, and the discrepancy does not render the advertisement legally insufficient. Um then we have received two phone calls requesting general information regarding the application. I will