STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The City Council of Clarksville held an Executive Session on December 1, 2025, at 4:30 PM in the City Council Chambers. The meeting covered several planning and zoning matters, including a controversial zone change for a garden center, new regulations for electronic message signs, street abandonments for the Lincoln Homes redevelopment, and the adoption of the Britton Springs Neighborhood Plan. The Council also approved a consent agenda comprising multiple second-reading ordinances and resolutions, and appointed members to the newly established Clarksville Gas and Water Board.
The consent agenda was approved without discussion, including:
This item sought to rezone 12.82 acres at the northern terminus of Kennedy Lane from C-4 (Highway Interchange) to C-5 (Highway & Arterial Commercial) to allow a garden center. The Regional Planning Commission recommended disapproval. Discussion centered on traffic safety, lack of a second egress for the neighborhood, and confusion over definitions of “nursery” vs. “garden center.” Councilman Wanda Smith expressed support, noting the applicant had been misled by conflicting city guidance over two years. Councilman Chandler voiced strong frustration, calling the city’s handling “a cluster” and stating the applicant had invested $800,000 with no results. Councilman Streetman suggested agricultural commercial zoning as a compromise. Traffic engineer David Smith noted no net traffic increase triggered a study but acknowledged congestion and stated a second connection could cost millions. Councilman Zacharias raised a pending zoning code rewrite that might clarify definitions. No final vote was taken; the matter will return for second reading.
This proposed citywide regulations for digital signs, including size, placement, and operation rules (e.g., minimum 5-second static display, maximum 5-second transition animation). RPC recommended approval. Councilman Streetman praised the public workshop process. Code official Crosby supported the rules as a needed tool, noting they provide clear enforcement criteria. Discussion refined transition definitions and addressed questions on static images (including background color changes). The ordinance will have two effective dates: construction standards upon adoption, and operational rules on April 1, 2026. No vote was taken at this first reading.
This resolution authorized the abandonment of portions of Howard Street, Lincoln Drive, and Ernest Shelton Drive to allow redevelopment of the Lincoln Homes public housing complex. RPC recommended approval. Councilman McLaughlin expressed no confidence in the current housing authority director and suggested postponement until a new director is hired, noting ongoing consultant searches. Councilman Wanda Smith argued for proceeding with the abandonment to avoid further delays, stating progress has been long awaited. No vote was taken; the matter is expected to be decided at a subsequent meeting.
This ordinance adopts a neighborhood plan developed with consultants Reagan Smith (Michael Burrell, Lauren Sands). The plan included recommendations on connectivity, housing diversity, and flood management, based on two community meetings and a survey. 47% of survey respondents supported preserving single-family homes; other desired housing types included cottage courts and townhomes concentrated at edges. Discussion raised concerns about proposed one-way streets and a roundabout, which the Planning Commission later removed from the final document. Street Department director David Smith indicated his department did not support several recommendations, including one-way streets and shared access, stating it would put them in an untenable position. Councilman Streetman and McLaughlin expressed reservations. No vote was taken.
No members of the public addressed the Council.
Gas & Water, Neighborhood & Community Services, Parks & Recreation, Public Safety, and Transportation-Streets-Garage chairs deferred full reports to the Thursday, December 4 meeting. Parks & Recreation Chair Brian Zacharias reminded of upcoming events: Nerf Wars Parents’ Night Out (December 5), Christmas Light Run (December 13), and lighted Christmas parade (December 13).
C Nurse Nursery and Landscape GP. This is 12.82 acres. Currently zone C requesting using to go to C5 Highway in Arterial Crucial District. This is a tract of land at the northern terminus of Kennedy Lane and Kennedy portion that's exit for. You have mixed use across the river to the west, and you have a suburban neighborhood, which matches the suburban neighborhoods to the south, and Kennedy Lane. Here's the zoning map. There's a lot of different zones here. You've got the existing neighborhood zone, some C4 on the ag in there, and then across the river to the west. This is the property at the end of Kennedy Lane. So that billboard on is the property. And looking back, exit four. All right, department comments. Did not require a traffic assessment due to the similarities between C5. Any specific roadway improvements would be determined at future development with a site plan. Western boundary of this property is covered by a FEMA flood area, but there's still developable land on this property. It's just the far west area where the spring creek does touch property. There were no other department comments or concerns. The impact would be to change from C4 to C5, allowing for a broader range of auto-oriented commercial use. This is in the suburban neighborhood future land use designation and staff and disapproval. This request is inconsistent with the overall goals and objectives of the adopted parcel and governments of plan. And to the south. While it would not align with the future land use design suburban neighborhood, an agricultural agricultural commercial district would permit the nursery operation significant reduction of commercial use potential. As noted is a FEMA flood area designation on the western boundary. Attention to this condition will be required at the parcel. Councilman Streetman, you're recognized. Thank you, Mayor. Mr. T you mentioned agricultural agriculture commercial would be a zone work for his needs for his business. Is this something that you have spoken with him about during the many months that this has been before the Rede Regional Planning Commission? We've had uh Mr. Thompson in our office discuss that, but he just did decide to press forward with the C5 alternative. Well, and I know that was something that I two months ago, the first time that it was deferred at the regional planning commission to allow them time to change their zoning request to a agriculture commercial versus the C5. Could you talk a little bit about the opportunities that would have the three could be utilized C5? Yes, and I'll take a step back and talk about why it's for in the first place, because we're on the property. So this is an old piece of property that uh if you can see the line of the Spring Creek and then over the interstate to the east. This uh originally was part of that larger tract, and when the interstate came through it through it, split this side off from that parcel. A billboard C4, it's been for many, many uh decades. In fact, or as we know it inner state interchange uses hotels, motels, restaurants, and then C5 would allow for a lot of uh personal services and um depot and those bigger boxes, those are only allowed in C2, C3, and C5. So even that skips over C4.