The City of Clovis Planning Commission convened on November 12, 2025, to review minutes, approve a zoning change for a mobile food truck business, and address two requests for conditional use permits regarding short-term rentals. The commission navigated significant uncertainty regarding upcoming city commission meeting dates, corrected a chronological error during the session, and discussed the future regulatory framework for short-term rentals, including potential text amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The commission unanimously approved all three agenda items presented.
Rezoning of 1705 Axtel Street:
Short-Term Rental Conditional Use (Cheyenne Meadows, 3028 Cheyenne Drive):
Miss Reyes, could you do a roll call, please? Commissioner Lendon. Here. Chairperson Moore? Here. Commissioner Sol? Here. Commissioner Garza? Here. Vice Chairperson Klein. Commissioner Martin. Here. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you. Now, if we've had enough time to look at the minutes, that's our next item is number three, approval of amendments from August 13, 2025. It's been a couple of months, so I'd entertain a motion to approve those minutes whenever you are ready. Move approval. Second approval by Commissioner Martin, who is a second? Commissioners. Commissioner Sowell. Get your name in there. Get my name in there. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Same sign. Thank you. New business number one request for approval of rezone of Malden Track 16 lot 9 addressed 1705 Axtel Street or Axtel Street from residential single family RS7 to Commercial General CG. Mr. Wilt, do you have something to say about this one? Thank you, Chairman. This is a request for a zone change of 1705 Axel from residential single family to commercial general. The reason for the request is he's got that uh mobile food cart that's parking outside. He's parking that in the residential area. And so in order to continue the business, he needs to make both of them uh commercial property. It meets the standards of unified development ordinance consistent with city comprehensive plans, and there's no compelling evidence there would be a threat to public health safety or welfare. And with that, I will stand with any questions. So this this mobile is it a push cart? No, it it's uh it's a truck. Oh, a truck. They've got the canopy built there on that vacant lot where they can eat in the shade and under you know out of the weather type thing. But in order for them to continue to uh to use that the way it's set up, I see that needs to be changed. Okay. Is this the one that is right on commerce and extra? We didn't have uh any objections for neighbors, correct? No. All parties were notified. So Mr.