Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
On June 11, 2026, the Columbia City Council held a regular meeting at City Hall. Key actions included approval of the FY2027 budget without a property tax increase, adoption of a reduced certified tax rate of $0.6068 per $100 (a 26.5% decrease from the previous $0.8251), and first consideration of ordinances regulating animal sales in public spaces and establishing uniform fire safety standards for government buildings. The council also received a quarterly economic development update from the Maury County Chamber and Economic Alliance.
All right. Well, good evening, everyone. I see 5 30 on the clock. So we will call tonight's meeting to order. If you're here this evening for city council, you are at the right place before we get into our formal council meeting. We're going to begin with some public hearings this evening, beginning with public hearing number one. Public hearing on ordinance number 4585 as amended, an ordinance to amend the fiscal year 2526 budget ordinance 4544 as amended, providing for the revisions to the general state street aid sanitation capital projects, grants, and wastewater funds. Public hearing number one. Anyone in the audience this evening here to be heard on public hearing number one. Seeing none, anyone on council should be heard on public hearing number one. Hearing none, entertain a motion to close public hearing number one. Motion's been made properly seconded. Any discussion on that item. Hearing none, Mr. Jablonski. Mr. McClellan, Mr. Huffman, is secrets, Marshall, McKellany. Vice Mayor McRoom. Aye, public hearing number one is now closed. Next item two, public hearing on ordinance number 4586, an ordinance fixing the tax rate for the city of Columbia for the year 2026 on all taxable property at the rate of 8251 per 100. Anyone this evening wish to be heard on public hearing number two. Just want to uh remind council that when you come to the second reading on this ordinance, that number has been adjusted downward to information we got from the proper says and Mr. Massey. This is maybe the eighth time I'll ask this question, but just to make sure that I understand fully why we do this because given the increase in assessments that if we did not do this, then this would effectively serve as a fact increase. And so we are required to either fix it at what the increase is or to adjust it to keep the rate the same. And that's what this is it. Yeah, the the new lower rate generate the same fact breath that said. All right, very good. Thank you. We'll remember the uh the updated figure when we get to it on the agenda item. Anyone else on council wish to be heard on public hearing number two? Hearing none, will invitation uh entertain a motion to close public hearing number two. Motion's been made properly seconded. Any discussion hearing none, Mr.