OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Columbus City Council Hearing on Alternative Crisis Response - Dec 9, 2025

City CouncilTuesday, December 9, 2025
BodyColumbus, Ohio
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, December 9, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:36:59

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Good afternoon, everyone, and uh welcome to our uh Columbus City Council's hearing on alternative crisis and the report that our uh contractors did for the City of Columbus is uh we're grateful to be here.

0:14

This is actually a joint hearing of uh the rules committee, public safety, as well as Health and Human Service and Equity Committee as well.

0:23

And so I want to begin by recognize the many people who made this moment possible from our council team, uh city staff from public health and public safety, Mr.

0:32

Cochrane, Director Cochrane, thank you so much.

0:35

Uh Ms.

0:36

Anita, thank you so much.

0:38

Um, so many community advocates, national partners from Mission Critical Partners, and the residents who have been advocating for years and years for this topic, with both their knowledge uh and their lived experience.

0:52

Today is an important milestone along that journey.

0:56

Mission Critical Partners has now released its report, and council members are here to learn from its findings.

1:02

Findings that challenge us to think differently about the city's current programs for alternative crisis response and to dig a little deeper into making this response an integrated part of our city's infrastructure.

1:16

As we all know, for decades, our default response to nearly every societal challenge has been the same.

1:23

Send police.

1:25

Mental health crises, substance abuse, homelessness, noise complaints, traffic issues, UDAL 911, and no matter the nature of the call, a cruiser shows up, lights flashing.

1:40

But we know that approach does not always serve people.

1:45

We know that most calls for service are not emergencies and do not involve a crime in progress.

1:52

And we know that asking police to respond to every situation, especially those involving behavioral health or social needs, can sometimes escalate crises rather than resolve them, particularly in communities where trust and law enforcement has been strained.

2:09

I want to be very clear this evening.

2:12

We support our police, and I believe every Columbus resident should be able to call 911 and get the help that they need when they're in crises.

2:22

But we also recognize that we need it to be more strategic about how we deploy our resources.

2:28

That understanding is what led council to launch the Reimagining Public Safety Initiative, which worked to redefine what safety really means, moving beyond a narrow reactive model and toward one that addresses the full range of factors that keep communities safe.

2:45

Alongside policing reforms and strategies like youth programming, we began building something new.

2:52

A system of alternative approach to crisis response.

2:55

We have invested in programs like the Right Response Unit, where social workers support 9 1 1 dispatch decisions, like the Mobile Crisis Unit, which pairs clinicians and officers when behavioral health expertise is needed, and React and the Spark team, which respond to overdoses and connect residents to critical services.

3:17

That progress is the result of tireless work by police, by fire, our public health partners, and community leaders who never stop pushing us to do better.

3:29

Today we have a growing network of interdependent interdepartmental and community-led programs that are actively reshaping how we think about safety and how we execute care.

3:41

That work has not always been easy.

3:43

At times it has been slow, but the early outcomes show real promise, and they tell us something important that this approach works, and we need to keep doing it.

3:55

And if we didn't know it from the data, we know it from the fact that over 20,000 residents have signed a ballot measure championed by the Columbus Safety Collective, demanding that the city keep going.

4:07

Which brings us to the to today.

4:10

The Mission Critical Partners report builds on this foundation and provides a clear roadmap for what comes next.

4:17

Full disclosure, I have not read all 200 pages of this report.

4:21

We were talking about this upstairs, but that's what I'll be doing over holiday break.

4:26

But here are a few things that jump out to me right off the bat.

4:30

First, it is time to establish a non-armed, non-uniformed crisis response option.

4:37

The report calls this a civilian response unit or a CRU, which would deploy trained licensed clinicians and peer support specialists to situations which aren't violent.

4:48

I believe that this community is ready for this.

4:52

Second, it is time to figure out some centralized organizational structure or office that synchronizes all this work so that we have one citywide strategy for crisis response.

5:04

Third, this approach actually saves money.

5:08

It is more effective and efficient.

5:11

It is a more effective and efficient way for a big city to provide public safety.

5:16

We should deploy highly trained police officers, paramedics, and firefighters to work at their highest and best use.

5:23

And we can deploy social workers, clinicians, and peer support specialists for the work that they do best.

5:30

Fourth, to help us implement this report, we need to create a table where everyone sits together.

5:37

Community members, council, administration, labor leaders, experts, and city staff.

5:44

It's time to establish the advisory commission that we've long talked about.

5:50

I'm gonna stop there because today's discussion is about understanding and understanding the many recommendations, asking the hard questions, and imagining what it looks like to implement them responsibly and effectively.

6:03

It's about ensuring that when someone is in crisis, that they get the response that they need every time.

6:11

So I'm grateful for the work that has brought us here today, and I'm excited for the conversation ahead as we consider how to take this uh to the next uh step.

6:22

Um I want to thank my uh colleagues.

6:24

I want to thank uh council member Beatty.

6:27

Uh, even after his last sitting meeting, he is still showing up for work, uh showing up to the very end.

6:32

Very grateful for Councilmember Beatty.

6:34

And I'm gonna turn it over to my two colleagues who are co-chairing this hearing with me.

6:38

Uh first starting with Councilmember Reamy.

6:40

Chair Reamy.

6:42

Thank you very much, Council President.

6:44

Um, as you mentioned, uh, there's been a lot of work to get to this point, and I'm excited to hear from mission critical partners about their analysis into our current programs and the opportunities ahead of us as it relates to alternative crisis response.

6:59

I too have not read the full report yet, but um certainly uh have glanced through it and saw some of the suggestions that that have been made.

7:10

We have a real opportunity right now to go above and beyond what I believe is already an impressive portfolio programs that serve residents when they call for help with their needs in mind.

7:23

So I'd like to thank um all of the city staff, including both council staff and staff from the Department of Public Safety, the Department of Public Health, both the divisions of fire and police who make up some of the great programs that we have today for getting us to this point, for working closely with all of our partners.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████54%
Community Engagement██████████████████21%
Technology and Innovation███████8%
Public Health████5%
Mental Health Awareness███4%
Procedural███4%
Workforce Development███4%
Summary of Proceedings

Columbus City Council Hearing on Alternative Crisis Response - Dec 9, 2025

On December 9, 2025, the Columbus City Council convened a joint hearing of the Rules, Public Safety, and Health & Human Services & Equity committees to review the Mission Critical Partners report on the city's alternative crisis response programs. Council President Catherine Parr Harden and Co-Chairs Councilmembers Reamy and Green opened the session by acknowledging the existing portfolio of programs (Right Response Unit, Mobile Crisis Response, React, and Spark) while emphasizing the need for a more integrated, system-wide approach. The hearing featured presentations from Mission Critical Partners on the current state of services versus the desired "advanced" continuum, alongside public testimony from researchers and community advocates calling for immediate implementation of a civilian response unit and stronger community oversight.

Consent Calendar

  • No specific items listed as routine routine approvals in the provided transcript text.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Dr. Leah Beavis (Professor, Ohio State University): Expressed strong support for the expansion of alternative response, citing data showing MCR reduces arrests and jail time for high-severity cases and lowers repeat calls for low-severity cases. Position: A new civilian crisis response pilot must be sizable (at least five teams, similar to MCR) to be effective and statistically evaluable; recommended dispatch to nonviolent psychiatric acute cases.
  • Deborah Seltzer (Public Advocate): Expressed full support for all recommendations to reduce harm, specifically urging the early establishment of the community advisory council. Position: Argued that without robust community voice and funding for non-emergency prevention (housing, schools, mental health), harm will continue; emphasized the need to remove barriers for community members to participate in the process.
  • Local 67 (Firefighters Union), Columbus Safety Collective, and Virginia Vote (Retired Social Worker): Submitted written testimony entering the record in support of alternative crisis response initiatives.

Discussion Items

  • Mission Critical Partners Presentation:
    • Current State: Identified that Columbus currently sits at the "upper foundational" stage of the alternative response continuum. While individual programs are strong, the city lacks an integrated system with unified coordination.
    • Program Analysis:
      • Right Response Unit (RRU): Noted as foundational but with limited collaboration with other teams and restricted weekend hours.
      • Mobile Crisis Response (MCR): Identified as a "transitional" model with 5 teams covering only 9% of eligible mental health calls. Staffing limitations prevent social workers from responding independently without an officer.
      • React & Spark: Housed under Fire; praised for internal coordination but noted for limited hours (non-24/7) and reliance on staff with deep tacit knowledge that creates retention risks.
    • Key Gaps: Highlighted fragmented authority, lack of cross-program data sharing, and a "free range" dispatching model that limits coverage efficiency. Stated that 33-40% of 911 calls are appropriate for alternative response.
    • Recommendations:
      • Civilian Response Unit (CRU): Recommended establishing a non-armed, non-uniformed unit staffed by clinicians and peer specialists, suggested to start as a $2.5 million pilot.
      • Centralized Structure: Proposed a "braided coordinating body" to unify strategy, leading to a permanent municipal entity co-equal to police and fire.
      • Advisory Panel: Recommended creating a permanent Alternative Response Advisory Panel (blending police review board independence with chief advisory structure) to foster trust and community input.
      • Dispatch Reform: Suggested coding calls better and assigning dedicated dispatchers for alternative teams.
    • Cost: Noted that 80-90% of calls coded for MCR are currently handled by police; proposed phasing in the CRU to manage costs and risk.

Key Outcomes

  • Report Acceptance: The Council accepted the Mission Critical Partners report (200 pages) as a roadmap for future action, with Council President Harden noting she will review the full text over the holiday break.
  • Strategic Direction: Council members expressed agreement on the necessity of a centralized administrative body and the implementation of a $2.5 million pilot for a non-armed Civilian Response Unit to be scaled up over time.
  • Next Steps: Administration agreed to develop a "Concept of Operations" document and a staffing/phase-in plan, targeting delivery in January 2026.
  • Budget Integration: Council President Harden directed that the budget hearings (starting immediately after the meeting) should explore the efficiencies and cost savings of these alternatives to address fiscal constraints.
  • Data & Evaluation: Agreement that any new civilian units must maintain public data sharing protocols for evaluation, with Councilmembers Green expressing concern about current data disparities (e.g., high volume of MCR calls in Northland) pending further inquiry.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone, and uh welcome to our uh Columbus City Council's hearing on alternative crisis and the report that our uh contractors did for the City of Columbus is uh we're grateful to be here. This is actually a joint hearing of uh the rules committee, public safety, as well as Health and Human Service and Equity Committee as well. And so I want to begin by recognize the many people who made this moment possible from our council team, uh city staff from public health and public safety, Mr. Cochrane, Director Cochrane, thank you so much. Uh Ms. Anita, thank you so much. Um, so many community advocates, national partners from Mission Critical Partners, and the residents who have been advocating for years and years for this topic, with both their knowledge uh and their lived experience. Today is an important milestone along that journey. Mission Critical Partners has now released its report, and council members are here to learn from its findings. Findings that challenge us to think differently about the city's current programs for alternative crisis response and to dig a little deeper into making this response an integrated part of our city's infrastructure. As we all know, for decades, our default response to nearly every societal challenge has been the same. Send police. Mental health crises, substance abuse, homelessness, noise complaints, traffic issues, UDAL 911, and no matter the nature of the call, a cruiser shows up, lights flashing. But we know that approach does not always serve people. We know that most calls for service are not emergencies and do not involve a crime in progress. And we know that asking police to respond to every situation, especially those involving behavioral health or social needs, can sometimes escalate crises rather than resolve them, particularly in communities where trust and law enforcement has been strained. I want to be very clear this evening. We support our police, and I believe every Columbus resident should be able to call 911 and get the help that they need when they're in crises. But we also recognize that we need it to be more strategic about how we deploy our resources. That understanding is what led council to launch the Reimagining Public Safety Initiative, which worked to redefine what safety really means, moving beyond a narrow reactive model and toward one that addresses the full range of factors that keep communities safe. Alongside policing reforms and strategies like youth programming, we began building something new. A system of alternative approach to crisis response. We have invested in programs like the Right Response Unit, where social workers support 9 1 1 dispatch decisions, like the Mobile Crisis Unit, which pairs clinicians and officers when behavioral health expertise is needed, and React and the Spark team, which respond to overdoses and connect residents to critical services. That progress is the result of tireless work by police, by fire, our public health partners, and community leaders who never stop pushing us to do better. Today we have a growing network of interdependent interdepartmental and community-led programs that are actively reshaping how we think about safety and how we execute care. That work has not always been easy. At times it has been slow, but the early outcomes show real promise, and they tell us something important that this approach works, and we need to keep doing it. And if we didn't know it from the data, we know it from the fact that over 20,000 residents have signed a ballot measure championed by the Columbus Safety Collective, demanding that the city keep going. Which brings us to the to today. The Mission Critical Partners report builds on this foundation and provides a clear roadmap for what comes next. Full disclosure, I have not read all 200 pages of this report. We were talking about this upstairs, but that's what I'll be doing over holiday break. But here are a few things that jump out to me right off the bat. First, it is time to establish a non-armed, non-uniformed crisis response option. The report calls this a civilian response unit or a CRU, which would deploy trained licensed clinicians and peer support specialists to situations which aren't violent. I believe that this community is ready for this. Second, it is time to figure out some centralized organizational structure or office that synchronizes all this work so that we have one citywide strategy for crisis response. Third, this approach actually saves money. It is more effective and efficient. It is a more effective and efficient way for a big city to provide public safety. We should deploy highly trained police officers, paramedics, and firefighters to work at their highest and best use. And we can deploy social workers, clinicians, and peer support specialists for the work that they do best. Fourth, to help us implement this report, we need to create a table where everyone sits together. Community members, council, administration, labor leaders, experts, and city staff. It's time to establish the advisory commission that we've long talked about. I'm gonna stop there because today's discussion is about understanding and understanding the many recommendations, asking the hard questions, and imagining what it looks like to implement them responsibly and effectively. It's about ensuring that when someone is in crisis, that they get the response that they need every time. So I'm grateful for the work that has brought us here today, and I'm excited for the conversation ahead as we consider how to take this uh to the next uh step. Um I want to thank my uh colleagues. I want to thank uh council member Beatty.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com