Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The City Council of Coppell, Texas, met on Tuesday, October 27, 2026, beginning with a closed executive session at 5:30 p.m., followed by a work session and a regular session that opened at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Center, 255 E. Parkway Boulevard. Mayor Wes Mays presided, and a quorum was present. The council discussed a proposed tollway police-services agreement, drainage design contracts, and board appointments, then unanimously approved the consent agenda, heard public comments, adopted a proclamation, received reports, and adjourned at 8:18 p.m.
Happy Halloween, everyone. Today is Tuesday, October 27th, 2026, and the time is 5.31 p.m. We're here for the regular session of the Cockville City Council. We do have a quorum present, so I'm calling the meeting to order. We'll be convening into executive session in the first floor conference room. At the end of the uh executive session, I'll come back out and announce work session, at which time the public will be invited and encouraged to join us. Thank you. Happy Halloween once again. The time is 6 43 p.m. And we have recess from executive session, and we'll move into work session in the first floor conference room. The public is invited and encouraged to join us. Thank you. First item is deliberation regarding the agenda. Anyone have any questions or comments on the agenda? Mark. I do. I am Z on the interlevel agreement with the NDTA. This is the NTTA. Yeah. So I just had a question. So one 110,302. Are we obligated to 247 365? Monitoring of that strip for rough? That's my understanding, yes. Now it works out to be $12.59. Let me clarify what that means. We we have the same obligation to monitor the tollways and the turnpikes as we do any other street in town. That doesn't mean any agreement doesn't require us to man or staff an officer on the turnpike or the hallway 24-7. We can if we want to, but we don't have to if we don't want to. And frankly, to be honest with you, um, if we chose not to post an officer out there ever, um burns on the NTTA to complain about it. We've got sort of an obligation to enforce out there, but we certainly have the authority to if we want to, but the the goal of the agreement is to enable the chief to determine the level of law enforcement appropriate for those tollways, and we still get paid by the ATTA regardless. Okay. Whereas before we didn't get paid at all. So they're trying to figure out a way to defer costs to municipalities. So I think they're left low-ball. NTTA NTTA is a government entity or a political subdivision. Um they may generate profits from turn bike and phones. Um but the purpose behind the whole agreement at all is to give them some level of comfort that there will be some type of law enforcement out there. Um not because we have an obligation to provide any level of service. You'll note that the agreement doesn't contain any metrics whatsoever. Yeah, I was looking for that.