The meeting began with a work session on parking management for climate-friendly and equitable communities compliance, followed by a regular council meeting that included public comments, presentations on public safety and library levies, and a land use decision. The council discussed three options for complying with state mandates, leaning toward option 1 (eliminating parking minimums citywide) but requesting further analysis and community input.
The City Council. This is our work session. This is Monday, August 4th, 2025. We're in the council chambers. We're also on the Zoom webinar, TV C T V live stream. And we also have available the wordly live translation. Those things are all on the agenda. You can find them there. And tonight's work session is parking management for climate-friendly and equitable communities compliance. And it's presented to us by Barbara Fryer, community development director. Barbara, you've got the floor. Good evening. So thank you. So you folks remanded the ordinance back to planning commission. So we had a workshop with planning commission, another work session. And they are insistent that the option that they recommended is the best option. So I'm going to go through this one more time. So compliance for all options are identified here. So parking area design reforms. So requiring a certain amount of coverage for shading or solar, having carpool spaces if the business has certain number of employees, EV parking requirements for developments with five or more multifamily developments, bike parking, and eliminating parking minimums within one half mile of a dare and baseline, which is the blue area. So it doesn't matter what color blue, but it's all the blue, it's just the GIS exercise. So that's no matter which option we choose. So the option that PC recommended twice is option one, and that would be no parking minimums anywhere in the city. Anytime we annex, it would apply there as well. And I know the color might not work for you, but this is kind of a summary of everything. So the gold that's along the top is common to every option. And then the whitish color is unique to each of the two and three options. So we'll go through that. So climate-friendly areas are the town center. Okay. If we eliminate parking minimums throughout the city, which is option option one, we don't have to do additional parking requirements in our town center. Options two and three, we would need to do that blue box on the two exhibits, which would require no parking minimums in this blue area, which is one quarter mile from the town center, which is our adopted climate-friendly area. Um we would have to manage parking by one of the following: either adopting a parking benefit district, where we would have paid on-street parking, and some revenues would be dedicated to public improvements in the area. So you would take out the admin costs, and then whatever is left, you would then reinvest in the area. Or adopting land use amendments to require no more than one half off-street parking space per dwelling unit in the area. And the third option is no parking minimums for commercial development. But most of that would be taken care of if we just eliminated parking minimums throughout the city. So that's why option one is preferred by planning commission because it's easier to administer. So then if we go to option two, the fair parking policy as DLCD calls it. So we just talked about those. So a subdivision is not the same. If it's one lot and it's a condominium, or it is a multifamily development or a mixed use development, then we would have to apply this. So and it applies retroactively. So Plaza Los Amigos, when they lease a new space, a new residential unit, we would have to come up with a mechanism to have them report to us the rent structure for the unit and the rent structure for the parking space, and they'd have to sell it separately. Every multifamily development that has five or more units, it would apply to. So either unbundling commercial parking. So Walmart, they couldn't have free parking for their employees or customers. So just think of how complicated that would be. So we could designate one residential parking district or a parking benefit district where on-street parking is managed through paid permits, meters, or other payment systems, or require again all multifamily residential units be unbundled, the parking be unbundled. So in addition to all of this, options two and three also has to remove requirements for garages and carports throughout the city, allow garage parking spaces if they're provided to count as any required parking, allow shared parking to meet minimums.