OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Council Bluffs, Iowa/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Council Bluffs City Council Study Session and Regular Meeting - September 14, 2026

City Council — Monday, September 14, 2026
BodyCouncil Bluffs, Iowa
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, September 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:23:48

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:02

We're gonna go ahead and get going.

0:04

First up, we have Chris and team to present to city council.

0:12

So about 60 days ago, it was a request from uh council member button and the rest of the council to look at what other communities are doing in terms of data center.

0:28

Um we asked for 90 days.

0:31

Uh Chris and team was able to get that completed 30 days ahead of schedule.

0:35

So they've been hard at work getting all of that information together, and Chris is here to present.

0:42

Thank you.

0:43

Um Mayor and Council, so happy to report back to you within 60 days from the data adoption of resolution on our data center research.

0:49

Uh myself and the planning team comprised of Moisis Monroy, Nahaji Kebe, and also a summer intern, um, Atticus Walker, all contributed the research, and essentially what we did is we looked at all of the communities in Iowa and Nebraska who have data centers and adopted ordinances, and then we looked at uh some of the other communities throughout the nation that have a high concentration data centers, which would be like Loudoun County, uh Fairfax, Virginia, which is almost known as the nation's capital for data centers.

1:19

And so in the resolution that was passed by council, there's several things that you asked for us to look at.

1:24

One being what is the definition of a data center, um, the approval process for a data center, are these uses allowed by right?

1:30

Are they require any special board or council approvals?

1:33

Uh, are there any specific zoning designations or overlays required for data centers?

1:38

Um, are there setback regulations, separation distances from churches, school, playgrounds, residential uses, um, and then are there any sort of special studies required for noise, environmental impacts, water usage, sanitary sewer, or others.

1:52

Uh, and then also part of it was a request from mayor to make sure that we looked into a decommissioning plan, as uh that seems becoming fairly common uh with data centers and communities.

2:02

And so I'll get you started here first, just kind of give you an overview of how the city currently regulates data centers, and then I'm gonna turn it over to Moises and let him kind of walk through the research, and then I'll take it back and go with the recommendations.

2:13

So, right now, the way your zoning ordinance is set up, is it defines a data center as a facility or facilities that house digital electronic equipment for internet hosting, electronic data storage and transfer, credit card financial transaction processing, telecommunications, and other activities that support electronic information based economy.

2:33

So that's a fairly broad definition that we have in our ordinance as it pertains to data centers today.

2:39

Uh and then as far as where they're allowed in our community, right now we allow them in the I2 district, uh which is your general industrial district, and in the PI, which is your planned industrial district, and that is subject to the underlying zoning requirements of each one of those specific districts.

2:53

So the PI being a planned industrial that allows for uses to go at a specific location with the adoption of a development plan.

3:02

And that development plan would cover uh civil stormwater, utility installation, grading, building architecture, landscaping, heights.

3:12

It really is a very kind of broad base approach looking at a particular use and allows for the city and a developer to kind of negotiate a master plan for how that site gets laid out and developed.

3:23

And that's only allowed right now in the PI district for data centers.

3:27

And then for the I2 district, we allow them uh with a conditional use permit from the zoning board of adjustment.

3:33

So it's not a use that's just allowed there by right.

3:36

You'd have to get a conditional use permit uh from the zoning board of adjustment.

3:40

And so um with that being said, there would be a conditional use permit required for the I2 district.

3:47

So I'm gonna turn over to Moises, let him kind of walk through the different communities that we looked at, and then I'll take it back over.

3:53

Um talk about maybe some proposed recommendations uh if council wants to move forward with the zoning text amendment.

4:00

So thank you.

4:04

Uh yeah, for those who don't know me, I'm Moisas Monroy.

4:07

I'm a planner with the community development department, and I'll provide a summary of of the research that we conducted.

4:13

So just to start off with, we looked at just provide some um background on the methodology methodology that we use.

4:20

So typically we when we conduct uh research on um in regards to zoning uh uh in other communities, we look typically we look at other major cities in Iowa, and we also look at uh kind of the metro area, so Omaha, Papale and Bellevue, and those other communities in that area.

4:37

But uh kind of this table uh summarizes uh many of those communities that are in a similar position, ask Council Bluffs in which they don't have um they haven't adopted any specific regulations in regards to data centers just like council bluffs.

4:55

So we as Chris alluded to, we looked at other communities in which uh data centers are prominent.

5:00

So again, those three uh Virginia communities, as well as some uh communities uh here in Iowa.

5:07

We looked at Link County, which is where uh Cedar Rapids is located, the county where Cedar Rapids is located, uh Payload, which is a city that's uh nearby Cedar Rapids, uh Alamacie County is a county that's all the way on the northeast of the state, and then Clinton County, which is uh nearby Davenport.

5:27

So we looked at these different communities because they have been able to, they have adopted uh uh again regulations that are specific to data centers, and that's kind of what the summary of these research is.

5:39

So we started looking at the definition, and uh the definition kind of varies slightly throughout communities, but but in uh in general, it's uh it refers to a facility that you that's used for the storage uh management, processing, and transmission of digital data.

5:54

So it's a pretty standard uh uh summarizes well what a data center is.

6:00

Uh but what we found, what we found uh more uh particularly interesting is that some of these communities uh also have distinctions on data centers based on the scale of the facility of the facility itself.

6:12

Um in Des Moines uh that distinction is based on the uh on the size, the actual size of the facilities based on the floor area.

6:21

And Lynn County and in Alamaki County, that extension is based on um power capacity.

6:27

So uh the scale of the data center does have implications on in regards to the regulatory processes that it has to go through, which zoning districts allow it, as well as separation distances that apply to those data centers.

6:38

So uh there is a actual real life implication on having that distinction.

6:44

Uh in regards to zoning approval processes, for the most part, data centers are allowed or limited to industrial zoning districts.

6:51

Uh some communities may allow it in commercial areas, but there is under certain special circumstances.

6:58

So it is primarily limited to industrial.

7:01

In other uh major Iowa cities, they're primarily allowed by right.

7:05

Uh in other communities, they may require the issuance of a conditional use permit or some type of special use permit.

7:12

Uh three other communities, which would be Paylo, uh, Lane County, and then Indianapolis, Indiana, uh, those uh communities have created uh brand new zoning districts that are dedicated exclusively to data centers.

7:26

And then one community, which would be Prince William County has implemented uh something slightly different, would which would be an overlay district uh that is again intended uh to address data centers.

7:35

So there's different approaches, and there is not a one-way uh that we found uh through our research.

7:42

Uh for setback and separation distance requirements.

7:45

Uh, what we found is that the most common uh minimum setback requirement for data centers is 200 feet, and that's measured from the building up to the property.

7:53

Then so uh again, your standard building setbacks, usually for data centers, we found that it was common to have a 200-foot setback.

8:01

Uh, and then in regards to separation requirements, uh, some communities implemented uh uh a certain distance that's required that a debtor center data center has to meet from a what we would call a sensitive area, and that includes residential properties, public parks, uh houses of worship, uh schools, um, historic uh historian landmarks.

8:22

So we found that again, these communities implemented those separation requirements, but it kind of ranged, there was there was a wide range of of uh separation requirements throughout community, kind of going from all from down from 500 feet all the way to half a mile.

8:36

So there was again implemented some separation requirements, but it varied by community.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations██████████████████████████████30%
Technology and Innovation████████████12%
Public Safety████████████12%
Transportation Safety█████████9%
Social Media Policy███████7%
Franchise Agreements██████6%
Public Engagement█████5%
Procedural█████5%
Engineering And Infrastructure████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Council Bluffs City Council Study Session and Regular Meeting - September 14, 2026

The City Council held a study session followed by a regular meeting on September 14, 2026. The main focus of the study session was a detailed presentation on data center regulations, including research on other communities and proposed zoning recommendations. The regular meeting included public hearings, consent agenda, and approval of numerous resolutions, including franchise agreements, subdivision plats, and policy adoptions.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent agenda was approved unanimously without discussion. It included routine approvals and items deemed non-controversial.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Paul Cersei (20 South 41st Street, Apt. 129) spoke during citizens' request to be heard. He urged the council to prioritize environmental and community impacts when drafting data center regulations, rather than prioritizing existing business interests. He noted that the 20-year tax abatement for Google (2007–2027) cost the city approximately $33 million in lost revenue. He also called out a council member's online comment about potentially disclosing another person's address, characterizing it as off-putting.

Discussion Items

  • Data Center Regulation Study (Presentation by Chris and Planning Team)

    • Staff presented results of a 60-day research project on data center regulations (originally requested with a 90-day timeline). They reviewed ordinances from Iowa, Nebraska, and national leaders like Loudoun County, Virginia.
    • Key findings: Most communities limit data centers to industrial districts; separation distances from sensitive uses range from 500 feet to half a mile; noise limits commonly set at 55 dB at the nearest residence; some require design standards, impact studies, and decommissioning plans.
    • Recommendations: Create small-scale (≤30 MW) and large-scale (>30 MW) data center definitions based on aggregate power usage per site; allow small-scale in I-1 and I-2 districts with conditional use permits; allow large-scale only in PI district with council-approved development plans; require closed-loop liquid cooling, design standards, noise controls, building setbacks (100 ft for small, 200 ft for large), separation distances (500 ft for small, 1,000 ft for large from sensitive uses), environmental/community impact analysis, and decommissioning plans with escrow accounts.
    • Council members expressed support for the recommendations but raised concerns: existing data centers would become non-conforming under new rules; the separation distances might limit available sites; the economic impact and property tax revenue from existing centers must be considered; the need to talk with utilities (MidAmerican) and existing companies (Google, CIRUS 1) before drafting amendments.
    • Councilman DeSalba requested a site availability analysis for different separation distance scenarios (e.g., 350 ft, 500 ft, 1,000 ft). Councilman Gorman noted that any code change creates non-conforming uses and that legal remedies exist. The city attorney confirmed that prior councils cannot bind future councils and that regulating data centers is legally permissible.
    • Council directed staff to form an internal subcommittee (including legal, planning, and other departments) and to invite input from MidAmerican Energy, Google, and CIRUS 1. The subcommittee will develop draft text amendments for planning commission review and eventual council consideration.
  • Pro Fleet Parking Lot Final Plat (Item 5G/Resolution 26-302)

    • The plat consolidates three lots on South 11th Street for a semi-truck parking and staging facility. The use had already received a conditional use permit from the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
    • Council discussion focused on traffic impacts on narrow two-lane roads and potential obstruction of fire station access. Some members expressed concern about the lack of a traffic study, but staff noted the use was already approved and this plat only merges parcels. The motion to approve carried (no formal tally recorded in transcript, but it passed).
  • Social Media Policy for Elected Officials (Resolution 26-275)

    • The city attorney explained that the policy distinguishes between personal and official accounts/posts. Elected officials cannot be disciplined by the council, but the policy sets expectations to avoid liability. Council members expressed skepticism about enforceability but adopted it as a good-faith effort. Motion carried, with some members noting it seems unenforceable but is a step toward professionalism.
  • MidAmerican Electric Franchise Fee (Ordinance 6700)

    • The ordinance renews a non-exclusive franchise for 25 years with a franchise fee of 2.5% (increased from 2%). One council member voted against, stating the increase will be passed on to residents. The motion carried with one nay (voice vote indicated opposition).
  • Other Items

    • Black Hills Natural Gas franchise renewal at 2% fee (passed unanimously).
    • Prohibition of alley vacation at High Street due to inability to contact all property owners (motion to deny carried).
    • Several engineering agreements, grants, and administrative resolutions were approved without debate.

Key Outcomes

  • Data Center Regulation: Council directed staff to form a subcommittee to draft zoning text amendments, incorporating input from existing data center operators and MidAmerican Energy. A site availability analysis for different separation distances was requested. All existing data centers will become non-conforming under any new rules; staff will propose mechanisms to mitigate impacts.
  • Pro Fleet Final Plat: Approved (Resolution 26-302). The plat consolidates lots for a truck parking facility; use already permitted by ZBA.
  • Social Media Policy: Adopted (Resolution 26-275) despite concerns about enforceability.
  • MidAmerican Franchise Fee: Ordinance 6700 passed with one dissenting vote (2.5% fee). Revenue purpose statement also adopted.
  • Black Hills Franchise: Adopted at 2% fee (Ordinance 6699 and Revenue Purpose Statement).
  • Alley Vacation: Denied due to lack of property owner response.
  • Other Approvals: All remaining resolutions and ordinances on the agenda were approved, including consent agenda, animal code amendments, TIF ordinance for East Manawa Drive housing, nuisance abatement liens, CDBG disaster recovery grant application, Tyler Technologies software agreement, and the River's Edge maintenance fund agreement with American National Bank.

Meeting Transcript

We're gonna go ahead and get going. First up, we have Chris and team to present to city council. So about 60 days ago, it was a request from uh council member button and the rest of the council to look at what other communities are doing in terms of data center. Um we asked for 90 days. Uh Chris and team was able to get that completed 30 days ahead of schedule. So they've been hard at work getting all of that information together, and Chris is here to present. Thank you. Um Mayor and Council, so happy to report back to you within 60 days from the data adoption of resolution on our data center research. Uh myself and the planning team comprised of Moisis Monroy, Nahaji Kebe, and also a summer intern, um, Atticus Walker, all contributed the research, and essentially what we did is we looked at all of the communities in Iowa and Nebraska who have data centers and adopted ordinances, and then we looked at uh some of the other communities throughout the nation that have a high concentration data centers, which would be like Loudoun County, uh Fairfax, Virginia, which is almost known as the nation's capital for data centers. And so in the resolution that was passed by council, there's several things that you asked for us to look at. One being what is the definition of a data center, um, the approval process for a data center, are these uses allowed by right? Are they require any special board or council approvals? Uh, are there any specific zoning designations or overlays required for data centers? Um, are there setback regulations, separation distances from churches, school, playgrounds, residential uses, um, and then are there any sort of special studies required for noise, environmental impacts, water usage, sanitary sewer, or others. Uh, and then also part of it was a request from mayor to make sure that we looked into a decommissioning plan, as uh that seems becoming fairly common uh with data centers and communities. And so I'll get you started here first, just kind of give you an overview of how the city currently regulates data centers, and then I'm gonna turn it over to Moises and let him kind of walk through the research, and then I'll take it back and go with the recommendations. So, right now, the way your zoning ordinance is set up, is it defines a data center as a facility or facilities that house digital electronic equipment for internet hosting, electronic data storage and transfer, credit card financial transaction processing, telecommunications, and other activities that support electronic information based economy. So that's a fairly broad definition that we have in our ordinance as it pertains to data centers today. Uh and then as far as where they're allowed in our community, right now we allow them in the I2 district, uh which is your general industrial district, and in the PI, which is your planned industrial district, and that is subject to the underlying zoning requirements of each one of those specific districts. So the PI being a planned industrial that allows for uses to go at a specific location with the adoption of a development plan. And that development plan would cover uh civil stormwater, utility installation, grading, building architecture, landscaping, heights. It really is a very kind of broad base approach looking at a particular use and allows for the city and a developer to kind of negotiate a master plan for how that site gets laid out and developed. And that's only allowed right now in the PI district for data centers. And then for the I2 district, we allow them uh with a conditional use permit from the zoning board of adjustment. So it's not a use that's just allowed there by right. You'd have to get a conditional use permit uh from the zoning board of adjustment. And so um with that being said, there would be a conditional use permit required for the I2 district. So I'm gonna turn over to Moises, let him kind of walk through the different communities that we looked at, and then I'll take it back over. Um talk about maybe some proposed recommendations uh if council wants to move forward with the zoning text amendment. So thank you. Uh yeah, for those who don't know me, I'm Moisas Monroy. I'm a planner with the community development department, and I'll provide a summary of of the research that we conducted. So just to start off with, we looked at just provide some um background on the methodology methodology that we use. So typically we when we conduct uh research on um in regards to zoning uh uh in other communities, we look typically we look at other major cities in Iowa, and we also look at uh kind of the metro area, so Omaha, Papale and Bellevue, and those other communities in that area. But uh kind of this table uh summarizes uh many of those communities that are in a similar position, ask Council Bluffs in which they don't have um they haven't adopted any specific regulations in regards to data centers just like council bluffs. So we as Chris alluded to, we looked at other communities in which uh data centers are prominent. So again, those three uh Virginia communities, as well as some uh communities uh here in Iowa. We looked at Link County, which is where uh Cedar Rapids is located, the county where Cedar Rapids is located, uh Payload, which is a city that's uh nearby Cedar Rapids, uh Alamacie County is a county that's all the way on the northeast of the state, and then Clinton County, which is uh nearby Davenport. So we looked at these different communities because they have been able to, they have adopted uh uh again regulations that are specific to data centers, and that's kind of what the summary of these research is. So we started looking at the definition, and uh the definition kind of varies slightly throughout communities, but but in uh in general, it's uh it refers to a facility that you that's used for the storage uh management, processing, and transmission of digital data. So it's a pretty standard uh uh summarizes well what a data center is. Uh but what we found, what we found uh more uh particularly interesting is that some of these communities uh also have distinctions on data centers based on the scale of the facility of the facility itself. Um in Des Moines uh that distinction is based on the uh on the size, the actual size of the facilities based on the floor area. And Lynn County and in Alamaki County, that extension is based on um power capacity. So uh the scale of the data center does have implications on in regards to the regulatory processes that it has to go through, which zoning districts allow it, as well as separation distances that apply to those data centers. So uh there is a actual real life implication on having that distinction. Uh in regards to zoning approval processes, for the most part, data centers are allowed or limited to industrial zoning districts. Uh some communities may allow it in commercial areas, but there is under certain special circumstances. So it is primarily limited to industrial. In other uh major Iowa cities, they're primarily allowed by right.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com