OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Crestwood, Missouri/Board of Aldermen & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Crestwood Public Safety Board Meeting – July 28, 2025

Board of Aldermen & Boards — Tuesday, July 29, 2025
BodyCrestwood, Missouri
SessionBoard of Aldermen & Boards
DateTuesday, July 29, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:18:14

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:17

Well good.

0:18

All right.

0:19

I've got seven o'clock, so we will uh call the July 28th, 2025 Public Safety Board meeting to order and start with the pledge.

0:32

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

0:37

And to the Republic for which it stands.

0:40

One nation under God.

0:43

Indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:50

All right, roll call.

0:55

Uh here.

0:56

Mary Statter.

0:58

Ryan Duffy.

0:59

Here.

1:00

Jacqueline Hendrickson is excused.

1:02

Dustin Mgarden.

1:03

Here.

1:04

Matthew Keeler.

1:05

Here.

1:06

Sarah Struckhoff.

1:07

Here.

1:08

Alderman Zavith.

1:09

Here.

1:10

Alder Person now.

1:12

Fire Chief Leo Meyer.

1:14

Police Chief Jonathan Williams.

1:18

All right.

1:19

We've got a quorum.

1:20

So let's see.

1:23

I will entertain a motion to approve the minutes from our March 24th, 2025 meeting.

1:36

All right.

1:37

Is there a second?

1:38

Second.

1:39

All right.

1:40

All in favor.

1:41

Aye.

1:43

Opposition.

1:45

None.

1:46

Okay.

1:47

So those are approved, and we will move on to public comment.

1:54

So it's rare that we have public, but you are welcome to comment.

1:59

Just step up, give your name and address, and uh.

2:05

We will be glad to hear your comments.

2:07

Hi, my name is Mary Lee Sauer.

2:09

I'm at 9306 Queenston Drive, award three.

2:14

And uh we are so glad to be here in support of the amended ordinance, Section 16-65 for invasion of privacy as introduced by Alderman Maby.

2:27

Fifteen months ago, on April 30th, 2024, our neighbors installed a 24-7 audio and 360 degree video with pan and tilt surveillance, dual cameras, infrared monitoring, remote controlled as well, 12 feet in the air on the back corner of their home, nearest to our backyard, and mere yards from our property line.

3:02

One camera has a landscape view in any position capturing an approximate 130-degree horizontal and a hundred twenty-degree vertical view.

3:15

The second camera can see details as far as 50 feet away.

3:40

And to this day, it's often directed right on our property.

3:44

Because of its no-blind spots, wide range, it is impossible impossible for this camera to not trespass on our backyard and record conversations without consent.

3:56

The camera has infrared technology that follows our movement, or it can be put on a rotating schedule as designed by the owner.

4:05

Over the past year, the neighbors' cameras have followed us throughout our front and backyards.

4:11

The backyard camera can record activity on almost our entire backyard and side yard, including private conversation.

4:18

It can also zoom in on private papers, cell phones, and computer screens.

4:24

Things that cannot be seen from the street or sidewalk.

4:29

The morning after they installed the first camera, I approached our neighbors.

5:00

But there should not be backlash allowed for anyone who reports an ordinance violation, nor anyone who a neighbor suspects of reporting them for an ordinance violation.

5:08

I waved down a police officer that just happened to be passing by our homes that same morning after the first camera was installed.

5:15

He informed our neighbors that they are allowed to put cameras up for security purposes.

5:21

After having that camera follow us every everywhere for at least the previous 15 hours, the neighbor pressed some buttons on his phone, held it up, and said that the camera was only pointing down at his side yard.

5:34

He then paused for a moment and said, Oh, yes, this is for security purposes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Privacy Ordinance███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Public Safety███████████████████████23%
Procedural████████8%
Public Works████████8%
Transportation Safety██████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Public Transportation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Crestwood Public Safety Board Meeting – July 28, 2025

The Crestwood Public Safety Board met on Monday, July 28, 2025, at 7:00 PM at the Crestwood Government Center. The meeting included public comments on two topics, reports from the Fire and Police Chiefs, and discussion and votes on an invasion of privacy ordinance and a traffic calming policy amendment. Key actions included unanimous rejection of the invasion of privacy ordinance as written and approval of the traffic calming policy amendment.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes Approval: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the March 24, 2025 meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Invasion of Privacy Ordinance: Mary Lee Sauer (9306 Queenston Drive) and her husband Devin Sauer testified in strong support of the amended ordinance (Section 16-65) introduced by Alderman Maby. They described a 15‑month ordeal with a neighbor’s 24‑7 audio and 360‑degree pan‑tilt‑zoom camera installed 12 feet high on the back corner of the neighbor’s home, which they said follows them throughout their yard and records private conversations. They argued the ordinance is a reasonable restriction to protect constitutional privacy rights and that enforcement would be simple. Devin Sauer stated that a civil lawsuit would be the only alternative, clogging courts, and urged the board to support the ordinance.
  • Traffic Calming Policy: Jerry Harris (926 Leewood Drive) expressed concern that current traffic calming procedures rely solely on speed data without adequate consideration of engineering factors such as slope, sight lines, and parking. He requested a more comprehensive evaluation. James Hahn (904 Leewood Drive) commented that the policy should clarify which residents are entitled to weigh in on intersection projects, suggesting a defined scope of impact.

Reports & Communication

  • Fire Chief’s Report: Chief Leo Meyer reported that EMS responses have increased. A new hire will start August 7, bringing the department to full staffing. Fire marshal inspections and plan reviews have risen. The department is exploring sending an engine on certain medical calls to improve response times.
  • Police Chief’s Report: Chief Jonathan Williams noted that second‑quarter 2025 crime numbers remain consistent, with a significant increase in stealing (shoplifting) and traffic accidents due to more businesses and construction on Watson Road. An experienced officer, John Polster, was hired and starts August 11. The Liggett Traffic Calming project was approved by the Board of Aldermen; speed humps will be installed soon, and mini‑roundabout landscaping design is in progress. Crestwood Night Out is scheduled for September 13. The police department’s new Mustang is striped but awaiting lights; a car‑cover project is delayed due to a vendor’s tornado damage and sizing concerns, with a change order coming to the Board in August. Alderman Zavith’s report mentioned golf carts in Whitecliffe Park (turned down), a completed bridge, community center reconstruction, Southington House foundation dug, and acquisition of flood‑prone homes used for police training.

Discussion Items

  • Invasion of Privacy Ordinance (16‑65): The board discussed the proposed amendment that would make it a violation to use security cameras to record audio or video on a neighbor’s property without consent. Police Chief Williams outlined three challenges: no state or federal law prohibits home security cameras, limited expectation of privacy in dense residential areas, and difficulty of investigation—obtaining a search warrant for camera footage would be nearly impossible without a state statute backing. He suggested the matter might be better handled as a housing code enforcement issue rather than a criminal ordinance, with specific rules on camera placement, height, and audio recording. Board members agreed the current language was too vague and unenforceable. After a roll‑call vote, all six members present voted no on recommending the ordinance as written. The board then unanimously approved a motion to refer the matter to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further study as a code enforcement violation.
  • Traffic Calming Policy Amendment: The board considered an amendment to Section 10‑2 of the municipal code to expand the definition of “residents directly affected” beyond the street where traffic calming is proposed, to include nearby residences, driveways, or those identified by city staff. The change was described as a learning‑from‑experience update to allow flexibility. Board members asked about engineering analysis; staff noted the design was based on work from a certified traffic safety officer and a former civil engineer, and that a demonstration project proved its effectiveness. The board unanimously approved the amendment.

Key Outcomes

  • Invasion of Privacy Ordinance: The board voted 6‑0 (with one member excused) to not recommend the ordinance as written. A separate motion to refer the issue to Planning and Zoning for consideration as a housing code enforcement matter passed unanimously.
  • Traffic Calming Policy: The board unanimously approved the amendment to Section 10‑2, updating the definition of “residents directly affected” to allow inclusion of properties beyond the immediate street. The amendment will be forwarded to the Board of Aldermen for final adoption.

Meeting Transcript

Well good. All right. I've got seven o'clock, so we will uh call the July 28th, 2025 Public Safety Board meeting to order and start with the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God. Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. All right, roll call. Uh here. Mary Statter. Ryan Duffy. Here. Jacqueline Hendrickson is excused. Dustin Mgarden. Here. Matthew Keeler. Here. Sarah Struckhoff. Here. Alderman Zavith. Here. Alder Person now. Fire Chief Leo Meyer. Police Chief Jonathan Williams. All right. We've got a quorum. So let's see. I will entertain a motion to approve the minutes from our March 24th, 2025 meeting. All right. Is there a second? Second. All right. All in favor. Aye. Opposition. None. Okay. So those are approved, and we will move on to public comment. So it's rare that we have public, but you are welcome to comment. Just step up, give your name and address, and uh. We will be glad to hear your comments. Hi, my name is Mary Lee Sauer. I'm at 9306 Queenston Drive, award three. And uh we are so glad to be here in support of the amended ordinance, Section 16-65 for invasion of privacy as introduced by Alderman Maby. Fifteen months ago, on April 30th, 2024, our neighbors installed a 24-7 audio and 360 degree video with pan and tilt surveillance, dual cameras, infrared monitoring, remote controlled as well, 12 feet in the air on the back corner of their home, nearest to our backyard, and mere yards from our property line. One camera has a landscape view in any position capturing an approximate 130-degree horizontal and a hundred twenty-degree vertical view. The second camera can see details as far as 50 feet away. And to this day, it's often directed right on our property. Because of its no-blind spots, wide range, it is impossible impossible for this camera to not trespass on our backyard and record conversations without consent. The camera has infrared technology that follows our movement, or it can be put on a rotating schedule as designed by the owner.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com