The Crestwood (Missouri) Charter Review Commission met at the Crestwood Government Center (1 Detjen Drive, St. Louis, MO), beginning shortly after 6:30 p.m. The agenda lists the meeting date as Monday, November 10, 2025, while the provided timestamp indicates Wednesday, November 12, 2025; this summary uses the provided timestamp. Chair Bob Sweeney (Ward 2) presided, with Angela Sebben (Ward 4) as Vice Chair. Commissioners Lisa Bozdeck, Beth Johnston, Matthew Koehler, Christopher Pickel, Mayor Scott Shipley, Megan Vedder, and Ted Yemm were also present. The Commission reviewed the draft ballot propositions containing proposed Charter amendments, recommended four propositions to the Board of Aldermen, folded Proposition 5 into Proposition 2, and directed the city attorney to finalize the ordinance language.
Okay, ready to go. It's uh after 6 30, so I will call to order the uh Charter Review Commission for the City of Crestwood. Um Jeff, we might as well take a roll call. Absolutely. Uh Chairman Sweeney here. Commissioner Bosdick? Here. Commissioner Kohler? Here. Commissioner Pickle? Here. Commissioner Shipley? Here. Commissioner Seven. Here. Commissioner Young? Here. Commissioner Vutter. Here. Commissioner Johnston. Here. That is a quorum and it is all hands on deck. This is the next item on our agenda is public comment. This is the opportunity for the public to make comments. Tell us what you think. If you know what we're doing. Anyone interested in making a comment? If you wouldn't mind, please come to the podium and state your name, and we're we're all yours. Within reason. Do I need to give my address? It's not necessary, but uh sure. Martha Duchild, uh, 9158 General Grant Lane, in case you need my address. Uh, first, I'd like to thank all of you for serving uh on this commission and for your hard work in identifying areas of the charter needing updating and revision. I'm here to talk about what is labeled as ballot proposition number four in tonight's agenda, which proposes extending the terms of office for mayor and aldermen from three years to four years. This is a consequential change that should be generated from the bottom up, meaning that residents or aldermen should be the one initiating this change rather than from the top down from the administration to this charter commission. I'm the wife of a former Ward 3 alderman, have personally known every Crestwood mayor since 2005, and have also known many of Crestwood's aldermen. At no time did any of these elected officials express concern about the length of their terms or any ill effects that would impact those who they served. The suggested change in terms came from the National League of Cities model charter. For perspective, there are over 190,000 cities across the U.S. according to the latest census, and the NLC is affiliated with only 2.5% of those cities. Not all cities are alike, and not all cities, including Crestwood, are best served by a cookie cutter one size fits all charter. Our current three-year terms for mayor and alderman have served the city well and effectively. There is no reason to propose changing them. With each year you add to an elected official's term, you increase the likelihood that they may be unable to finish that term due to any number of issues. How is the city best served if there are aldermen or mayors who need to step down mid-term creating vacancies in their respective seats? Three-year terms are manageable and provide the necessary turnover and fresh ideas to keep the city vibrant. The staggering of our three-year terms ensures stability and institutional knowledge. And that stability is maintained by having incumbents run for re-election. Looking at the current and past boards, there are always a good number of multiple-term aldermen and mayors serving at any time. That is less likely to happen if terms are extended to four years.