The Public Works Board convened to discuss two main agenda items: revisions to recreational vehicle (RV) parking regulations and proposed changes to the sewer lateral policy. The board approved a motion to forward new RV parking rules to the city attorney and reviewed financial data on the sewer lateral program without taking a formal vote.
Note: The agenda listed the meeting date as November 19, 2025, but the instruction specified November 21, 2025; this summary uses the latter date as required.
Um anyway. Um there you go. Any other thoughts? For against these as anything different than a regular ten person van. So I think it's hard for us to I they're they're a bit taller. They're a bit taller. I mean a sprinter band. I mean it's just a sprinter band. It's little distance for maybe an extra foot or two on the on one section. There are other work trucks that are in the neighborhood that are taller than this thing. That the that are legally parked in the street. So I I'm I don't necessarily say it's a bigger problem. If someone was trying to live in it, that would be an issue. Any bigger than this, I think you're gonna see a money have a much bigger problem with there's a vehicles, plenty of vehicles this size that don't follow the RV in I don't remind you these two. So that are not RVs that are this is disabled vehicles for disabilities. Same size. Actually, the exact same make them up. Same size. So you're you know, one person's over a small deviation of its label as an R little ridiculous. Yeah, I feel I feel the same. I think is this size of vehicle, it's hard to restrict. Um for all the points that have been made. Um so I think it's hard to restrict that. I don't think it's a good idea that it'd be used as an RV in front of the house or on the street. But parking it's an issue. And we're definitely addressing the issue that they have brought up the potential for someone to my kids coming in town. Oh, no, I'm gonna let that that is. That one's completely separated from that. This is just focus on the park. We're not we're not talking about okay as long as you're not like each other blocking the sidewalk. I mean, I think it's it's okay as long as you're not like you say not blocking the sidewalk and more than 22 foot long, yeah. You start blocking the sidewalk and you have issues there in it, or just poor parking through parking in the street. That's the one depending on where that's where I'd see being an issue, but then once again, it's not any wider than any other car that's in the end street. So you can't really complain about that. It's just a little bit longer. The height the height thing is one second, it's an effect, it's not really gonna affect much, but it but a visual thing, it's not gonna affect anything. Well, the other ortage now is commercial vehicles can't be parked on the street overnight. So these would not be lettered or anything else. So no, this is this is basically a particular circumstance in which the sprinter van type model, which is considered an RV by the state, and that's how it's registered. Yes, it's registered with the state as an RV because we did look up this particular one's classification is considered RV. So because of that, it then falls under the RV parking statutes, whereas it doesn't cover fee of the statutes back. I think I would like to call for a vote. All right, well that second Patrick, who would are you uh calling for a vote in it for approval or denial? For approval. Okay, so a motion for approval. Okay, thank you. Good, thank you. Chairman Luddy Abstain. Abstain, okay. Commissioner Welge.