The Dunedin Code Enforcement Board held a regular meeting on June 3, 2025, at City Hall (737 Louden Ave.) starting at 2:02 PM and adjourning at 2:55 PM. The board addressed four enforcement cases, including one affidavit of compliance and three new business items involving property maintenance, zoning violations, and offensive accumulations. Key actions included findings of violation, compliance deadlines, and a declaration of violation. The meeting also marked the retirement of Secretary to the Board Joan McHale.
Case 25-1184 – City vs. 2235 Harbor View Trust et al. (2235 Harbor View Drive): Inspector Laurel presented evidence of multiple IPMC violations (exterior maintenance, unsafe conditions, exterior walls, window/door frames) at a single-family home. The property had been unsecured (pool fence) but that was resolved. Despite verbal promises from the owner’s representative, no repairs were made. The board found the property in violation. Motion carried 5–1 (Mr. Wielinski dissented) to order compliance by July 3, 2025, with a fine of $150 per day per violation thereafter.
Case 25-1288 – City vs. Judith C. Laine (2016 Woodward Avenue): Inspector Laurel described a chronic violation of zoning standards regarding parking/storage of jet skis in the front yard. The property had a history of non-compliance, but the jet skis were removed by the hearing date. The board declared a violation but noted current compliance. Unanimous motion to issue a Declaration of Violation: if the same code section is violated within five years, an immediate fine of $500 per day may be imposed.
Case 25-1290 – City vs. Judith C. Laine (2016 Woodward Avenue): Inspector Laurel presented evidence of offensive accumulation (household items, debris) on the driveway and front yard. Respondent’s son, Daniel Laine, testified that he was caretaking for his elderly mother, the property was under contract for sale (closing June 24), and he had been cleaning up. He showed photos of near-complete compliance. Staff recommended a two-week compliance period. Unanimous motion to find violation and order compliance by June 17, 2025, with fines of $150 per day per violation if not met.
Okay, so I already did the preliminaries about the cell phones and the microphones while you were out. Um we usually begin with a reading of the statement of purpose of the board, and I'm going to ask our new member, uh Mr. Alexander, to read it. All right. Make sure your green light is on. I think the green light is on. And uh statement of purpose. Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board. The code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the city of Dunedin has occurred. In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation. All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth. The city, through its staff, will present its evidence of the alleged violation after the city has completed its presentation. The respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence. Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board. The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present brief opening and closing statements if so desired. The board will then openly deliberate considering only the evidence presented, the law, and common knowledge. By motion, duly made and seconded, discussed and approved by at least four members of the board, an order will be issued. The order will contain one a findings of fact, two, conclusion conclusions of law, three, affirmative action to be taken. The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail. Thank you. Um before we begin with the items that are on the formal agenda, there is an opportunity for people to speak to items that are not on the agenda. Is there anyone here in the room that wants to speak about an item that's not on the agenda? No? Okay. All right. The first item on the agenda then is the consent agenda. We have approval of the minutes of our meeting last month on May 6th. Has everyone on the board had an opportunity to review them? I have one question. I did not use it. Please, Lisa. Say your name, please. Lisa Hunt. Uh did we change new business 5A from case 24-1167 to 25-1167? Is that on page three? Right here. Is that the one that was incorrect on the agenda? Yes. Okay. Okay, good. Right. Thank you. Sure thing. Jamie Ballard, I move to accept the minutes. A second, please. Willinski accept. Do we need a roll call, John? No. All those in all those in favor? Aye.