The Dunedin Code Enforcement Board met on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, at 2:00 PM at City Hall. Chair Phil Stone presided, with members Jason Gillette, Dan Bolduc, Walter Sweetser, Jeremy Reynolds, alternate members Lisa Hunt and Chris Alexander present. Members Matthew Wielinski and Vice-Chair Jaime Ballard were excused. The meeting addressed two affidavits of compliance and two new cases involving the same respondent, Klaus Schurr.
People please to turn off your electronic devices. For those of you who haven't had the pleasure of coming before us before, our meetings are recorded. And so if you're going to be speaking, please do what I'm doing. Get up close to the mic, kiss it. And it will make life much easier for the people who have to transcribe the minutes of our meeting. Thank you. Okay, it's two o'clock. Welcome to the November meeting of the Dunedin Code Enforcement Board. My name is Phil Stone, and I am the Chair. Um we will now read the call to order. Statement of purpose. Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board. The Code Enforcement Board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the code or codes and ordinances of the City of Dunedin have occurred. In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation. All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth. The city, through its staff, will present the evidence, its evidence of the alleged violation after the city has completed its presentation. The respondent shall afford the opportunity to present its evidence. Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board. The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present brief opening and closing statements if so desired. The board will then openly deliberate considering only the evidence presented, the law, and common knowledge. By motion, duly made and seconded, discussed and approved by at least four members of the board, an order will be issued. The order will contain one the findings of fact, two, the conclusion of law, three affirmative action to be taken. The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail. We will now continue with our hearings. Thank you. So we have two gentlemen in the audience. Are you both here on schedule cases? Okay, thank you. Okay, the next item on the agenda would be the approval of the minutes from our last meeting of October 7th. Um they were distributed to members of the board. I'll entertain a motion to approve, unless someone has any questions, comments, or edits that need to be made. Chairman Reynolds, I so move. Thank you. A second, please. Lisa Hunt, second. Thank you, Lisa. Um do we need a roll call? Mr. Gillette. Aye. Mr. Boldock? Aye. Ms. Hunt. Aye. Mr. Sweet Sarr. Aye. Mr.