OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Dunedin, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Regular Meeting - August 11, 2026

City Commission & Boards — Tuesday, August 11, 2026
BodyDunedin, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateTuesday, August 11, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 57:05

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

Go ahead and call the meeting to order.

0:02

Um I do want to take notice that uh if there is anybody here that is not on the agenda uh that would like to speak.

0:10

Um you all are on the agenda, so I think we're good.

0:14

No?

0:15

Do you all want to speak?

0:17

No, just observing?

0:19

Okay, fantastic.

0:20

Perfect.

0:22

All right, going back to the top.

0:24

Uh opening statements uh and statement of purpose.

0:27

Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board.

0:31

The code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the city of Dunedin has occurred.

0:40

In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation.

0:48

All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth.

0:56

The city through its staff will present its evidence of the alleged violation.

1:01

After the city has completed its presentation, the respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence.

1:08

Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board.

1:14

The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted uh to question any of the witnesses before the board and present uh brief opening and closing statements if so desired.

1:26

The board will then openly deliberate, considering only the evidence presented, the law and common knowledge by motion duly made and seconded seconded, discussed, and approved by at least four members of the board in order will be issued.

1:39

The order will contain the findings of fact, conclusions of law, affirmative action to be taken.

1:44

The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail.

1:49

I'll ask everybody to please uh put your cell phones on silent and we will proceed.

1:55

Uh first order on the agenda is the uh consent agenda, first item I'm sorry, consent agenda, and that would be the approval of the draft minutes to the code enforcement board meeting from July 7th.

2:07

If there are no changes, additions, or corrections, I'll entertain a motion to accept the minutes as submitted.

2:14

Lisa Hunt.

2:17

Move to accept the minutes.

2:23

I need a second.

2:24

Second.

2:25

Sweetzer, second.

2:26

Okay, I've got a motion and a second.

2:28

Any further discussion?

2:30

Hearing none, I'll call for the vote.

2:32

Thank you, Mr.

2:33

Gillette.

2:34

Aye.

2:35

Ms.

2:35

Hunt.

2:36

Aye.

2:36

Ms.

2:37

Ballard?

2:38

Aye.

2:38

Mr.

2:38

Sweetser.

2:39

Aye.

2:40

Mr.

2:40

Alexander.

2:41

Aye.

2:42

Thank you.

2:43

Next item on the agenda is the testimony oath of staff and public.

2:46

So anybody who will be testifying today will need to be sworn in.

2:58

Perfect.

2:59

I have affidavits of compliance.

3:01

Uh first case, case number two six-three eight five city versus uh Lara Michael A, and I will turn it over to staff who will be presenting.

3:10

That would be me.

3:11

Thank you, Rachel.

3:12

Good afternoon, board members.

3:13

Uh my name is Rachel Laurel, City of Dunedin Code Compliance Inspector.

3:18

Testifying in reference to case number 26-385.

3:23

The property is located at 1670 Country Lane.

3:28

Um at the July 7, 2026 hearing, the board ordered a uh a correction of the violation by July 21st, 2026, or a fine of 150 dollars per day shall be imposed.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Pending Litigation██████████████████████████████30%
Procedural████████████████████████24%
Zoning Enforcement████████████████████████24%
Code Enforcement█████████████████17%
Public Safety███3%
Community Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Regular Meeting - August 11, 2026

The City of Dunedin Code Enforcement Board met at City Hall, 737 Louden Avenue, on August 11, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Vice-Chair Jaime Ballard presided in the absence of Chair Phil Stone, with Members Terry Sweetser and Jason Gillette and Alternate Members Lisa Hunt and Chris Alexander present. Chair Stone and Dan Bolduc were excused; Jeremy Reynolds and Matthew Wielinski were absent without excuse. The board handled two compliance affidavits, two old-business accessory-structure cases, and two new-business enforcement cases, including a repeat bed-and-breakfast violation. All votes were unanimous, and the meeting adjourned at 2:57 p.m.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the draft minutes of the July 7, 2026, Code Enforcement Board meeting as written by unanimous vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No citizen input was offered and no public comment was made on any agenda item.

Affidavits of Compliance

  • Case 26-385 (Michael A. Lara, 1670 Country Lane): Inspector Rachel Laurel reported the property was inspected July 15, 2026, and the zoning/site-standards violation had been corrected before the July 21, 2026, compliance date. The board accepted the Affidavit of Compliance.
  • Case 26-432 (Michael A. Lara, 1670 Country Lane): Inspector Laurel reported the same inspection found the motor-vehicle violation corrected before the July 21, 2026, compliance date. The board accepted the Affidavit of Compliance.

Old Business

  • Case 26-192 (Peter Karoub, 1396 Overcash Drive): Inspector Laurel testified the accessory-structure violation ordered corrected by July 2, 2026, remained on July 6 and August 11, 2026. The fence had not been repaired; the slats had been removed, leaving the frame. Certified mail was unclaimed, and a voicemail from Steve Karoub on May 11, 2026, said the violation would be corrected. The board found non-compliance, determined it a minor violation, and imposed $150 per day from July 2, 2026, until compliance, with an order to contact Code Compliance for reinspection.
  • Case 26-349 (David M. Ritter, 1776 Pasadena Drive): Supervisor Julie Phillips testified the accessory-structure violation remained as of July 8 and August 11, 2026. The respondent was not present; an email of May 25, 2026, stated he considered the matter closed. The board found non-compliance, determined it a minor violation, and imposed $150 per day from July 2, 2026, until compliance, with an order to contact Code Compliance for reinspection.

New Business

  • Case 26-582 (Roell trusts, 2673 St. Joseph's Drive E): Supervisor Phillips presented a repeat violation of DCO Section 103-14.8.1, operating a bed and breakfast in the MF-15 zoning district without a conditional use permit. Evidence included Airbnb/VRBO listings for a four-unit complex advertising 90-day reservations but requiring three-night minimum stays; staff reached payment pages on June 23, June 24, July 17, July 31, August 10, and August 11, 2026. The board heard that the property had prior enforcement contacts: rezoning denied in 2021, compliance in 2023, a $4,000 fine paid in 2024, and a $1,000 fine from May 2025 that remained unpaid. The board found a repeat violation and imposed a $500-per-day fine for the six documented dates, totaling $3,000, and ordered the respondent to contact Code Compliance for reinspection.
  • Case 26-245 (Ioanna Kappis, 180 Milwaukee Avenue): Inspector Michelle Gilbert presented violations of the Land Development Code vehicle-parking standards and IPMC Section 302.8 (motor vehicles). An unlicensed Dodge Caliber was first parked on the right-of-way grass by a No Parking sign and later moved to an unkept gravel area; it remained there with notices unclaimed. The owner reportedly relied on 2018 Engineering permission to park there, but the area had not been maintained or contained. The board ordered compliance by August 28, 2026, and, if not compliant, a fine of $150 per day per violation until compliance; the respondent was ordered to contact Code Compliance for reinspection.

Other Business

  • No board member or city attorney comments were made.
  • City staff verified for the record that the prior order in Case 26-582 was Case 25-1279, with out-of-compliance dates April 24-25, 2025, and a $1,000 fine.
  • The next Code Enforcement Board meeting was set for September 1, 2026.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved July 7, 2026, meeting minutes unanimously.
  • Accepted compliance affidavits in Cases 26-385 and 26-432.
  • Imposed continuing $150-per-day fines in Cases 26-192 and 26-349 from July 2, 2026, until compliance.
  • Found a repeat violation in Case 26-582 and imposed a $3,000 fine ($500/day for six documented non-compliant dates).
  • Ordered Case 26-245 brought into compliance by August 28, 2026, with $150 per day per violation to follow if not.
  • Scheduled the next meeting for September 1, 2026; meeting adjourned at 2:57 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Go ahead and call the meeting to order. Um I do want to take notice that uh if there is anybody here that is not on the agenda uh that would like to speak. Um you all are on the agenda, so I think we're good. No? Do you all want to speak? No, just observing? Okay, fantastic. Perfect. All right, going back to the top. Uh opening statements uh and statement of purpose. Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board. The code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the city of Dunedin has occurred. In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation. All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth. The city through its staff will present its evidence of the alleged violation. After the city has completed its presentation, the respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence. Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board. The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted uh to question any of the witnesses before the board and present uh brief opening and closing statements if so desired. The board will then openly deliberate, considering only the evidence presented, the law and common knowledge by motion duly made and seconded seconded, discussed, and approved by at least four members of the board in order will be issued. The order will contain the findings of fact, conclusions of law, affirmative action to be taken. The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail. I'll ask everybody to please uh put your cell phones on silent and we will proceed. Uh first order on the agenda is the uh consent agenda, first item I'm sorry, consent agenda, and that would be the approval of the draft minutes to the code enforcement board meeting from July 7th. If there are no changes, additions, or corrections, I'll entertain a motion to accept the minutes as submitted. Lisa Hunt. Move to accept the minutes. I need a second. Second. Sweetzer, second. Okay, I've got a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Hearing none, I'll call for the vote. Thank you, Mr. Gillette. Aye. Ms. Hunt. Aye. Ms. Ballard? Aye. Mr. Sweetser. Aye. Mr. Alexander. Aye. Thank you. Next item on the agenda is the testimony oath of staff and public. So anybody who will be testifying today will need to be sworn in.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com