OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Dunedin, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Meeting - October 6, 2026

City Commission & Boards — Tuesday, October 6, 2026
BodyDunedin, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateTuesday, October 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:12:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

I chair of the Code Enforcement Board for the City of Dunedin.

0:03

It's 2 o'clock and we're going to get started.

0:06

If you have a phone or any other digital device, please put it on Do Not Disturb or Silent.

0:12

If this is your first time here and you'll be speaking, our meetings are transcribed, and it's much easier for the people doing that if you speak directly into the microphone.

Speaker 2

0:23

If you sit back here,

Speaker 1

0:25

it doesn't get picked up.

0:26

So eat the mic.

0:30

First item of business is the call to order.

0:33

Our recently promoted Jamie Ballard is going to uh do that for us, please.

Speaker 3

0:40

For those of you who don't know me, I'm vice chair, Jamie Ballard.

0:44

Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board.

0:47

The Code Enforcement Board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the City of Dunedin has occurred.

0:56

In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation.

1:04

All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth.

1:12

The city, through its staff, will present its evidence of the alleged violation.

1:16

After the city has completed its presentation, the respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence.

1:22

Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board.

1:29

The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present brief opening and closing statements if so desired.

1:38

The board will then openly deliberate considering only the evidence presented, the law, and common knowledge.

1:44

By motion duly made and second, discuss and approved by at least four members of the board.

1:49

In order will be issued.

1:50

The order will contain the findings of fact, conclusions of law, affirmative action to be taken.

1:56

The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail.

Speaker 1

2:01

Thank you.

2:02

The next item on our agenda is an opportunity for citizen input.

2:06

This is an opportunity for people here to speak to items that are not on the agenda.

2:12

Is there anyone here who wishes to speak?

2:16

No.

2:17

Okay, we'll move on.

2:19

The next item would be our consent agenda.

2:22

The first item would be approval of the draft minutes to our September meeting.

2:27

We were talking briefly before our meeting officially started.

2:30

We did find one typo.

2:32

Jamie, would you like to speak to it?

Speaker 3

2:34

Uh sure.

2:34

Uh I make a motion to approve the minutes as amended to change uh vice mayor to vice chair in the last sentence.

Speaker 2

2:42

Jeremy Reynolds, I second.

Speaker 4

2:46

Thank you.

2:48

Mr.

2:48

Olinski.

Unassigned speaker

2:49

Aye.

Speaker 4

2:49

Ms.

2:50

Hunt.

2:50

Aye.

2:51

Ms.

2:51

Ballard?

2:52

Aye.

2:52

Mr.

2:52

Reynolds?

Speaker 1

2:53

Aye.

Speaker 4

2:54

Chair Stone.

Speaker 1

2:55

Aye.

2:55

The motion passes.

Speaker 4

2:56

Thank you.

2:56

Sorry about

Unassigned speaker

2:57

that.

Speaker 1

2:59

Next item on the agenda, uh, the swearing in of anyone who's going to be testifying today.

3:04

Um here in the audience who is going to be speaking needs to be sworn in.

3:13

Thank you, Julie.

Unassigned speaker

3:22

Thank you.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Code Enforcement█████████████████████████████████████████████87%
Procedural████8%
Homelessness██3%
Public Engagement█2%
Summary of Proceedings

Dunedin Code Enforcement Board Meeting - October 6, 2026

The Code Enforcement Board of Dunedin, Florida, met on October 6, 2026, at 2:00 PM at City Hall, 737 Louden Ave. The meeting was chaired by Vice Chair Jamie Ballard and lasted until 3:12 PM. The board addressed one affidavit of compliance, four old business cases, and five new business cases. A key procedural change was announced: future first orders will not specify a fine amount; instead, the board will determine fines at the second hearing based on gravity, actions taken, and prior violations.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (September 1, 2026): Approved as amended (changed "vice mayor" to "vice chair" in the last sentence). Motion passed 6–0.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No citizen input was offered during the public comment period.

Affidavits of Compliance

  • Case 26-410 – City vs. Suncoast Third Trust (53 Highland Ave.): Inspector Michelle Gilbert reported the violation (offensive accumulation) was corrected by July 24, 2026, before the July 28 deadline. The board accepted the affidavit of compliance unanimously.

Old Business (Noncompliance Cases)

  • Case 26-245 – City vs. Ioanna Kappis (180 Milwaukee Ave.): Violation of parking standards and inoperable vehicle. The respondent failed to correct by August 28, 2026. The board found the violation minor and imposed a fine of $150 per day per violation from August 29, 2026, until compliance. Motion passed 5–1 (Ms. Hunt dissented).
  • Case 26-805 – City vs. Julie & Phyllis Williams (50 Squire Ct.): Two violations (offensive accumulation, premises cleanliness). Compliance date September 10, 2026. Inspector documented ongoing accumulation, squatters, and unsafe conditions. The board found the violation severe and imposed a fine of $250 per day per violation ($500/day total) from September 11, 2026. Motion passed 5–1 (Ms. Hunt dissented).
  • Case 26-590 – City vs. Michael & Trisha McDonald (1082 Mary Jane Lane): Violation of utility trailer screening standards. Compliance date September 15, 2026. Inspector showed a makeshift, unpermitted gate. The board initially designated the violation as severe but corrected to minor. Fine of $150 per day from September 16, 2026. Motion passed 6–0.
  • Case 26-617 – City vs. George S. Bella & Schwalm Holdings LLC (1141 Friar Tuck Ln): Violation of front yard setback (vehicle parking on unapproved surface). Compliance date September 15, 2026. Inspector showed continued noncompliance. The board found the violation minor and imposed a fine of $150 per day from September 16, 2026. Motion passed 5–1 (Ms. Hunt dissented).

New Business

  • Cases 26-768 & 26-770 – City vs. Eleftherios Zervoudakis (115 Mira Vista Dr.):
    • 26-768 (Offensive Accumulation): Inspector Julie Phillips documented building materials, debris, and a gate without permit. By October 5, 2026, the property was in compliance. The board issued a declaration of violation with no fine, noting any repeat violation within five years could result in a fine up to $500/day. Motion passed 6–0.
    • 26-770 (Exterior Walls – Protective Treatment): The property had peeling paint, but by October 5, 2026, all exterior surfaces were painted. The board issued a declaration of violation with no fine, same repeat-violation warning. Motion passed 6–0.
  • Cases 26-812 & 26-813 – City vs. Realty Income Properties 13 LLC (1804 Main St.):
    • 26-812 (Excessive Weeds/Grass): Inspector Rachel Laurel documented overgrowth. The property was mowed by September 16, 2026. The board issued a declaration of violation with no fine, with repeat-violation warning. Motion passed 6–0.
    • 26-813 (Maintenance & Accumulation of Rubbish): Two violations: unmaintained landscaping (overgrown shrubs/palm trees) and accumulated rubbish/garbage in dumpster enclosure. The property had not been corrected by October 6, 2026. The board ordered compliance by October 20, 2026. If not in compliance, a fine of up to $250 per day per violation ($500/day total) will be imposed. Motion passed 6–0.

Key Outcomes

  • Procedural Change: The city attorney announced a revision to the motion template: first orders will not set a specific fine amount; the board will determine fines at the second hearing based on gravity, corrective actions, and prior violations.
  • Next Meeting: Scheduled for November 3, 2026 (Election Day). The board opted not to reschedule.
  • Sunshine Training: A reminder was given about an upcoming Sunshine Law training session; it will be recorded for those unable to attend.
  • Case Updates: The city manager is investigating the property at 50 Squire Ct. and meeting with the Pinellas Sheriff's Office regarding its history.

Meeting Transcript

I chair of the Code Enforcement Board for the City of Dunedin. It's 2 o'clock and we're going to get started. If you have a phone or any other digital device, please put it on Do Not Disturb or Silent. If this is your first time here and you'll be speaking, our meetings are transcribed, and it's much easier for the people doing that if you speak directly into the microphone. If you sit back here, it doesn't get picked up. So eat the mic. First item of business is the call to order. Our recently promoted Jamie Ballard is going to uh do that for us, please. For those of you who don't know me, I'm vice chair, Jamie Ballard. Before proceeding, I will set forth the purpose of this board. The Code Enforcement Board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the City of Dunedin has occurred. In order to meet that obligation, all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation. All witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth. The city, through its staff, will present its evidence of the alleged violation. After the city has completed its presentation, the respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence. Any members of the board, the person presenting the city's case, or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board. The respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present brief opening and closing statements if so desired. The board will then openly deliberate considering only the evidence presented, the law, and common knowledge. By motion duly made and second, discuss and approved by at least four members of the board. In order will be issued. The order will contain the findings of fact, conclusions of law, affirmative action to be taken. The order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail. Thank you. The next item on our agenda is an opportunity for citizen input. This is an opportunity for people here to speak to items that are not on the agenda. Is there anyone here who wishes to speak? No. Okay, we'll move on. The next item would be our consent agenda. The first item would be approval of the draft minutes to our September meeting. We were talking briefly before our meeting officially started. We did find one typo. Jamie, would you like to speak to it? Uh sure. Uh I make a motion to approve the minutes as amended to change uh vice mayor to vice chair in the last sentence. Jeremy Reynolds, I second. Thank you. Mr. Olinski. Aye. Ms. Hunt. Aye. Ms. Ballard? Aye. Mr. Reynolds? Aye.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com