OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Dunedin, Florida/City Commission & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Dunedin Local Planning Agency Meeting - October 14, 2026: Sunrise Townhomes Design Review Approval

City Commission & Boards — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodyDunedin, Florida
SessionCity Commission & Boards
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 55:05

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

And thank you for your patience this evening.

0:03

The October 14th, 2026 meeting of the local planning agency of Dunedin will now come to order.

0:09

The local planning, oh, reminder to everyone, remember to turn on and off your microphones when you're speaking.

Speaker 2

0:15

Okay.

Speaker 1

0:16

Quick reminder.

0:18

The local planning agency is an advisory board of citizens appointed by the city commission.

0:22

This board is comprised of volunteers who represent the thoughts and concerns of the community.

Unassigned speaker

0:27

The

Speaker 1

0:27

purpose of tonight's meeting is to make recommendations to the city commission regarding each item on the agenda.

0:34

Item 1A.

0:37

The first item on our agenda tonight is to approve the September 9th, 2026 LPA minutes.

0:42

Are there any corrections, additions, or deletions that anyone saw?

0:46

Okay.

0:46

With that hearing none, do we have a motion to approve?

0:51

Sally motions, Deborah Seconds.

0:53

All in favor, say aye.

0:55

Aye.

0:55

Any opposed?

0:56

Okay.

0:57

Motion passes.

0:58

The minutes are approved.

1:00

On the agenda tonight, item 1B is a quasi-judicial in nature, and as such, the format for this evening will be as follows.

Unassigned speaker

1:07

The

Speaker 1

1:08

local planning agency is not a quasi-judicial board and therefore has no final decision making power.

1:14

Our procedures for quasijudicial items are structured in a quasi-judicial manner, however, for the benefit of those who come before it.

1:23

The commission will be the ultimate quasi-judicial decision making authority on this item.

1:28

The process for this evening will be as follows.

1:30

I will introduce the item, after which the city representative will present information about it.

1:35

Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to ask questions of the city representative.

1:41

Second, the applicant will present information about the item.

1:46

Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to ask the applicant questions.

1:51

If the applicant has any questions of staff or staff has any questions of the applicant, we ask that they address those to the board.

1:59

Third, anyone from the public may come forward.

2:02

Those from the public wishing to provide testimony will need to approach the lectern, state their name and address for the record, then utilize the microphone at the speaker's lectern in order for their comments to be recorded.

2:15

Individual speakers will be limited to a three minutes of speaking time, and we kindly request everyone be respectful of that clock.

2:22

Citizens speaking on an agenda item or during citizens' comment shall not engage in loud, boisterous, or disruptive behavior or conduct.

2:30

Any speaker that has continued inappropriate or relevant uh comments will be requested to relinquish the podium.

2:37

Finally, both the city representative and the applicant will be provided any final comments.

Speaker 3

2:41

Okay.

Speaker 1

2:42

Upon conclusion of each public hearing, the local planning agency will consider the evidence before it and will vote on the agenda item.

2:49

The voice vote is a rendition of the order of the board, and there will be no written decision issued by the board.

2:55

Further, should the board vote to recommend denial of the matter, they will provide the basis for their denial.

3:01

At this time in the audience, um anyone who wishes to give testimony tonight to these items on the agenda will need to be sworn in by the city clerk.

3:18

Any citizens planning to give testimony?

3:22

Okay.

3:24

All right.

3:25

Well, if you speak later, you'll have to be sworn in then.

3:28

Okay.

3:29

Item 1B.

3:30

Application DR 2026-0002.

3:35

Request for design review approval for the development of a multifamily residential product project called Sunrise Townhomes, consisting of a two-story building comprising eight townhomes at 1116 Martin Luther King Avenue.

Unassigned speaker

3:50

Uh

Speaker 1

3:50

and it was formerly known as uh 534 Howell Street.

Unassigned speaker

3:54

Okay.

Speaker 1

3:54

Yes.

3:55

Uh has anyone on the board had any ex parte communications regarding this item?

Unassigned speaker

4:00

No.

Speaker 1

4:01

Nope.

4:01

Okay.

4:02

Hearing none, George will turn it over to you for the staff presentation.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Development Code█████████████████████████████████████37%
Zoning Enforcement██████████████████████████26%
Procedural█████████9%
Land Use Planning████████8%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Solid Waste Management███3%
Affordable Housing██2%
Stormwater Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Dunedin Local Planning Agency Meeting - October 14, 2026

The Local Planning Agency (LPA) of Dunedin, Florida, met on October 14, 2026, to consider one quasi-judicial item: a design review application for the Sunrise Townhomes development. The meeting began at 6:00 PM and included agenda approval, staff and applicant presentations, public testimony, and a board vote. The LPA unanimously recommended approval of the project subject to conditions regarding landscaping along the southern property line and solid waste management.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of September 9, 2026 LPA Minutes: The board approved the minutes from the previous meeting by a unanimous voice vote (motion by Sally, second by Deborah). No corrections or additions were noted.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Late Public Comment (Written): A letter from neighboring property owner Bill Faulkner, received late the previous night, requested that the design include additional mature trees along the southern border to protect privacy. The letter was addressed to the city clerk and summarized by staff during the meeting.
  • Oral Testimony – Deborah Mobourne (504 Howell Street): Ms. Mobourne expressed concern that the applicant had removed her fence and claimed three feet of her property. She clarified that she was worried about loss of privacy and property. She also requested that a white vinyl fence be installed promptly to block construction dust and debris. The developer’s representative, Steven D'Giovanni, assured her that the fence would be replaced and that a survey confirmed the property lines, noting that any encroachment was a misunderstanding regarding the 15-foot city easement.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation (George Kinney, Community Development): Mr. Kinney presented the Sunrise Townhomes project, a two-story building with eight townhomes at 1161 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue (formerly 534 Howell Street). The project had previously been approved in August 2024 but expired because the applicant did not obtain vertical building permits within 12 months. The new application included enhanced architecture (e.g., varied rooflines, corbels, additional windows) as required by the Architectural Review Committee (ARC). Staff confirmed the project meets land use and zoning requirements, including density, height (24 feet), and dimensional standards. A compatibility analysis of 36 surrounding buildings found the two-story design consistent with the area. The project also pursues Florida Green Building Silver certification. Staff recommended approval subject to standard conditions: compliance with LDC, consistency of construction plans with approved drawings, and expiration of approval in 12 months unless permits are obtained.
  • Late Issue – 15-Foot City Easement: Mr. Kinney noted a 15-foot-wide city-owned easement between the project’s southern property line and the neighboring homes on Howell Street. He suggested two options: vacate the easement (unlikely) or allow the developer to plant trees and install landscaping within it. The city engineer indicated no utilities are likely present, but further study is needed. The developer expressed willingness to participate in such landscaping if feasible.
  • Developer Presentation (Steven D'Giovanni, DJani Homes): Mr. D'Giovanni confirmed the architectural enhancements approved by ARC. He explained the project will have eight units, each with a two-car garage (16 spaces), plus two additional permeable paver parking spots on each end for guests. Stormwater will be managed via an underground vault, and sewer laterals will connect to city sewer. He clarified that the units will be sold as condominiums (fee simple) with an HOA responsible for common areas. Trash collection will be at a central point at the end of the driveway, with residents rolling bins to the street. He agreed to work with the city on a right-of-way agreement for landscaping in the easement and to install a white vinyl fence along the property line.
  • Board Questions and Clarifications: Topics included:
    • The manhole cover in the sidewalk (determined to be part of the stormwater system).
    • Fire protection (no sprinklers required; firewalls between units).
    • Master metering for water with submetering for individual units.
    • Solid waste collection (the board suggested a landing pad or dumpster enclosure to avoid a parade of bins; staff to coordinate with solid waste division).
    • Sufficiency of driveway width for emergency vehicles (20 feet confirmed).
    • Timelines: building permits have been submitted and are under review; construction expected to start soon.
  • Board Deliberation: Members expressed support for the project, emphasizing its positive impact on the neighborhood. They discussed the possibility of using the city easement for a double buffer (fence and shrubs) maintained by the HOA. The board also recommended that solid waste review determine the best method for trash collection (centralized dumpster vs. designated landing pad for roll-out bins).

Key Outcomes

  • Motion by Paul to approve the design review application with the following conditions:
    1. Staff to research and, if feasible, execute a right-of-way use agreement with the future HOA for maintenance of landscaping (trees, shrubs) and a fence within the 15-foot city easement along the southern property line.
    2. Staff to coordinate with the city’s solid waste division to determine whether a centralized dumpster enclosure or a designated landing pad is more appropriate for trash collection.
  • Second by Dr. Broom.
  • Vote: The motion passed unanimously (all members present voiced “aye”; no opposition noted).
  • Next Steps: The recommendation will be forwarded to the Dunedin City Commission for final quasi-judicial decision. Staff will conduct the requested research before the commission hearing.

Meeting Transcript

And thank you for your patience this evening. The October 14th, 2026 meeting of the local planning agency of Dunedin will now come to order. The local planning, oh, reminder to everyone, remember to turn on and off your microphones when you're speaking. Okay. Quick reminder. The local planning agency is an advisory board of citizens appointed by the city commission. This board is comprised of volunteers who represent the thoughts and concerns of the community. The purpose of tonight's meeting is to make recommendations to the city commission regarding each item on the agenda. Item 1A. The first item on our agenda tonight is to approve the September 9th, 2026 LPA minutes. Are there any corrections, additions, or deletions that anyone saw? Okay. With that hearing none, do we have a motion to approve? Sally motions, Deborah Seconds. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Motion passes. The minutes are approved. On the agenda tonight, item 1B is a quasi-judicial in nature, and as such, the format for this evening will be as follows. The local planning agency is not a quasi-judicial board and therefore has no final decision making power. Our procedures for quasijudicial items are structured in a quasi-judicial manner, however, for the benefit of those who come before it. The commission will be the ultimate quasi-judicial decision making authority on this item. The process for this evening will be as follows. I will introduce the item, after which the city representative will present information about it. Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to ask questions of the city representative. Second, the applicant will present information about the item. Thereafter, members of the local planning agency will have the opportunity to ask the applicant questions. If the applicant has any questions of staff or staff has any questions of the applicant, we ask that they address those to the board. Third, anyone from the public may come forward. Those from the public wishing to provide testimony will need to approach the lectern, state their name and address for the record, then utilize the microphone at the speaker's lectern in order for their comments to be recorded. Individual speakers will be limited to a three minutes of speaking time, and we kindly request everyone be respectful of that clock. Citizens speaking on an agenda item or during citizens' comment shall not engage in loud, boisterous, or disruptive behavior or conduct. Any speaker that has continued inappropriate or relevant uh comments will be requested to relinquish the podium. Finally, both the city representative and the applicant will be provided any final comments. Okay. Upon conclusion of each public hearing, the local planning agency will consider the evidence before it and will vote on the agenda item. The voice vote is a rendition of the order of the board, and there will be no written decision issued by the board. Further, should the board vote to recommend denial of the matter, they will provide the basis for their denial. At this time in the audience, um anyone who wishes to give testimony tonight to these items on the agenda will need to be sworn in by the city clerk. Any citizens planning to give testimony? Okay. All right. Well, if you speak later, you'll have to be sworn in then. Okay. Item 1B. Application DR 2026-0002.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com