OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Edina, Minnesota/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Edina City Council Town Hall on Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance - January 6, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, January 6, 2026
BodyEdina, Minnesota
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, January 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

That may want to testify.

0:02

We may not have time.

0:03

I think if we would have given you advanced notification that it was going to be two minutes and not three minutes, we could have gotten more testimony in.

0:10

But we're going to try to be mindful of the time that we allocated here two and a half hours.

0:17

So for those watching in, uh there'll be other ways to submit testimony, and we'll talk about that uh as we go along here.

0:23

Uh we're going to accept that testimony up to uh uh end of business or end of end of midnight, I guess, on on Sunday uh January 11th.

0:32

So keep that in mind as we as we discuss this.

0:35

So uh having provided information about doing all these meetings on a hybrid basis, and typically what would happen is that city council here we would say, okay, you can testify about anything that's not on the agenda tonight or scheduled for a future public hearing.

0:48

But we've only got one matter on the agenda this evening, and that's a discussion of this uh potential implementation of a con what I'll call a conditional gun ordinance uh that would uh take effect uh if the state decided to do away with preemption uh of cities being able to control the sale of guns and ammunition.

1:07

So let's uh call the meeting to order.

1:09

I'm gonna ask our clerk Sharon Allison to call the role, and then we're gonna uh take the Pledge of Algiance, and then we'll get into the heart of the meeting.

1:15

Thank you.

Speaker 2

1:16

Councilmember Agnew?

1:17

Here.

1:17

Councilmember Jackson.

1:18

Here.

1:19

Councilmember Pierce?

Speaker 1

1:20

Here.

Speaker 2

1:20

Councilmember Risser?

1:21

Here.

1:21

Mayor Havlin.

Speaker 1

1:23

Here.

1:23

Uh next is the Pledge of Allegiance.

Speaker 3

1:26

Pledge of allegiance allegiance

Speaker 4

1:28

to the flag of the United States of America.

1:31

And to the Republic for which it stands.

Bill Kemmer · Speaker 5Inferred

1:38

Liberty and justice for all.

Speaker 1

1:44

We have a form of meeting agenda for the meeting this evening.

1:47

As I mentioned, there's one main topic of uh of the meeting.

1:51

Is there a motion to adopt a meeting agenda?

Speaker 6

1:53

So moved.

Unassigned speaker

1:54

I

Speaker 6

1:54

second.

Speaker 1

1:55

Jackson movement Ragnarok seconds the adoption of the meeting agenda for this meeting on January 6, 2026.

2:00

Any further discussion?

2:01

All those in favor of adoption of the meeting agenda is published, say aye.

2:04

Aye.

2:05

Aye.

2:05

Opposed, carried.

2:06

The meeting agenda is adopted.

2:08

As I mentioned earlier, we have one meeting topic this evening.

2:11

And I want to again thank everybody for uh being here to discuss this very serious topic of gun violence and the potential passage by this council of a conditional local gun regulating ordinance.

2:23

First, I want to talk about a process matter, and that is, as Director Benarott has mentioned, if you desire to speak this evening, please make sure that you fill out a card.

2:30

We're not going to ask you for your address like we used to do in the past.

2:33

I think for security reasons, you just give us your name.

2:36

Make sure you give that card to the uh communications director, Director Benarott.

2:40

And then if you want to use the projector in the middle, or you have some kind of another another presentation you want to uh use that's an electronic form or thumb drive form, let us know that, and we'll get you a wireless microphone.

2:51

Um I'll hearken back to uh what happened uh uh locally here with uh uh uh at Annunciation Church.

3:00

You know, our local, our council members have a strong and common sentiment in the aftermath of that gun violence at Annunciation Church regarding being supportive of those families, those students and those school officials affected for a lifetime by the rage of a single person.

3:15

We have also determined that our empathy and our shared grief are not enough, and that some form of action on the issue of curtailing gun violence is important.

3:23

Recognition of the challenge of doing something about gun violence has existed since Columbine in Colorado now years ago, to enunciation in our metropolitan area just a few short months ago, and most recently at Brown University and Kentucky State University in December.

3:39

Few cities, states, or our own federal government have been moved to action due both to uh the differing of views of people on the issue of of guns and their regulation, uh the causes of gun violence, and in addition to the challenges of existing law, both statutory and constitutional, on both the state and federal basis.

3:58

This council has asked our city attorney to craft a potential ordinance that does not run afoul of the existing state law in Minnesota, which preempts cities from regulation of firearms and ammunition.

4:09

Our city attorney has responded to that request, creating a proposed form of ordinance that is contingent in its implementation upon our council passing a resolution should the legislature ever choose to overturn the ban on cities regulating the sale of certain types of firearms and ammunition.

4:25

I'm gonna turn now to our city attorney Dave Kendall to uh give us a little bit of background on the work that he did and the research that he did and the modeling that he undertook for purposes of creating our ordinance uh and talk about a couple other things that are legal related as well.

4:40

Mr.

4:40

Kendall.

Speaker 4

4:41

Uh thank you, Mayor.

4:42

I think first of all, we need to start with the preemption issue, which uh I think the council is aware is Minnesota Statute 471.633.

Unassigned speaker

4:52

It does say the legislature preempts all authority of cities to regulate firearms, ammunition, and their components to the complete exclusion of any ordinance uh passed by that city.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████61%
Gun Regulation████████████16%
Community Engagement███████10%
Mental Health Awareness███████9%
Youth Programs██3%
Pending Litigation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Edina City Council Town Hall Meeting on Proposed Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance - January 6, 2026

The Edina City Council held a town-hall public hearing on Tuesday, January 6, 2026, beginning at 6:04 p.m. in Council Chambers at Edina City Hall. All five council members were present: Councilmembers Agnew, Jackson, Pierce, Risser, and Mayor Hovland. The sole agenda item was Ordinance 2025-17, a proposed contingent Firearm Safety and Safe Storage Ordinance. After nearly two and a half hours of public testimony, the council took no action and said it would consider the ordinance at its regular meeting on January 20, 2026. The meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m.

Agenda and Meeting Process

  • The council unanimously adopted the published agenda (motion by Member Jackson, second by Member Agnew).
  • Mayor Hovland explained that Minnesota law currently preempts city firearm regulation, so the proposed ordinance would be conditional. It would take effect only if the state repealed or changed preemption and the council later passed a resolution specifying what is enforceable.
  • The city attorney presented legal background; speakers were limited to three minutes; written comments were accepted through the Better Together Edina website until midnight Sunday, January 11, 2026.

Proposed Ordinance and Legal Context

  • City Attorney Dave Kendall cited Minnesota Statute 471.633, which preempts all city authority to regulate firearms, ammunition, and their components, with a limited exception for regulating firearm discharge. He noted Edina already makes discharging a firearm illegal.
  • The draft ordinance is modeled on a St. Paul ordinance and is intended to regulate semi-automatic weapons, binary triggers, large-capacity magazines, and similar items associated with mass shootings.
  • The key local difference is the effective-date mechanism: the Edina ordinance would not become enforceable until the council adopted a resolution after any change in state law. Mr. Kendall said this was intended to avoid the ambiguity being litigated in the St. Paul case between the City of St. Paul and the Gun Owners Caucus.

Public Comments and Testimony

Support for the Ordinance

  • Fletcher Merkel's grandparents, Ron and Carol, spoke in favor, describing the loss of their grandson at the Annunciation Church shooting. They said the next day would have been his ninth birthday and urged the council to act.
  • Sarah Paisley, an Edina mom and leader of the new Edina Moms Demand Action chapter, said the group already has 365 members. She called gun violence the number one killer of children and asked each council member to act with courage.
  • Erin Zamoff, a Protect Minnesota board member, cited research that mass shootings involving assault weapons result in six times as many people shot and twice as many killed, and that large-capacity magazines increase the number of people killed by more than 60 percent and the number wounded by more than 100 percent. She also cited the federal ban on large-capacity magazines of more than 10 rounds from 1994 to 2004.
  • Karen Bertulli, a lawyer and parent, described the Uvalde school shooting and said an Everytown poll found 88 percent of Minnesota respondents were concerned about children being harmed in mass shootings. She called the ordinance a first step against weapons of war.
  • Dr. Trish Valusek, a pediatric trauma surgeon on duty at Children's Hospital on August 27, said gunshot wounds have been the leading cause of death for children ages 1 to 17 since 2020, and that the rate of gun-related child deaths has increased 106 percent since 2013.
  • Dr. Julia Heneghan, a pediatric critical care physician, said firearms are the number one cause of death for American children and adolescents and described caring for children injured or killed by guns.
  • Other supporters included Annunciation-connected parents and survivors, students from Students Demand Action, educators, physicians, faith leaders, and veterans. Pastor David Lose of Mount Olive Lutheran Church, who accompanied Fletcher Merkel's family, said the shooting did not have to happen and urged passage. Grace Verbrugge, a former Annunciation student, described learning about the shooting by text from her mother. Tess Rada, whose third-grade daughter was at Annunciation, described her family's PTSD. Teachers Stephen Sanger and Joy Dunn, students Gabriella Olson and Mia, and resident Laura Thrane, whose niece was killed at Sandy Hook, also urged passage.
  • Veterans for Peace chapter representative Michael Orange and retired scientist Bill Kaemmerer argued that military-style weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment. State Representative Julie Greene, a parent of an Annunciation student, said her family's names were on the shooter's hit list and pledged to work at the state legislature.

Opposition and Alternative Views

  • Dave Wright, a longtime Edina resident, opposed the ordinance. He argued it is preempted, raises Second Amendment problems, exposes the city to costly litigation, would criminalize law-abiding residents, and would not stop criminals. He recommended enforcing existing laws, education, safe-storage outreach, and mental health support, and submitted a briefing memo.
  • Bob Elmore asked the council to focus on societal changes rather than guns, noting that firearms were widely available in 1926 without school shootings.
  • Doug Bakker, who said he lost a son to drugs and a daughter to suicide by gun, opposed the ordinance as a waste of time and money and called for more mental health investment.
  • Dan Nye argued the Second Amendment's text is clear and that the Annunciation shooter, not law-abiding gun owners, was responsible.
  • David Buyse said guns don't kill people; people kill people, and urged attention to mental health and accountability rather than banning objects.
  • Janie Weston said local action is useless until the state acts and urged efforts at the state and federal levels, citing Japan's gun laws.
  • Kirk Aadalen, testifying by phone, said the council currently lacks legal authority to pass gun regulations; he encouraged the council to support the regulations' goals and pressure state and federal officials.
  • Wayne Carlson proposed mandatory gun-safety training for gun buyers, and a father of three who described himself as a Second Amendment supporter said he supported responsible gun ownership but not military-style weapons.

Key Outcomes

  • No vote was taken on Ordinance 2025-17.
  • The council will continue consideration at its regular meeting on January 20, 2026.
  • Written public testimony will be accepted through midnight on Sunday, January 11, 2026, via Better Together Edina.
  • The meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m. by unanimous vote (motion by Member Agnew, second by Member Pierce). The minutes of this meeting were later approved by the council on January 20, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

That may want to testify. We may not have time. I think if we would have given you advanced notification that it was going to be two minutes and not three minutes, we could have gotten more testimony in. But we're going to try to be mindful of the time that we allocated here two and a half hours. So for those watching in, uh there'll be other ways to submit testimony, and we'll talk about that uh as we go along here. Uh we're going to accept that testimony up to uh uh end of business or end of end of midnight, I guess, on on Sunday uh January 11th. So keep that in mind as we as we discuss this. So uh having provided information about doing all these meetings on a hybrid basis, and typically what would happen is that city council here we would say, okay, you can testify about anything that's not on the agenda tonight or scheduled for a future public hearing. But we've only got one matter on the agenda this evening, and that's a discussion of this uh potential implementation of a con what I'll call a conditional gun ordinance uh that would uh take effect uh if the state decided to do away with preemption uh of cities being able to control the sale of guns and ammunition. So let's uh call the meeting to order. I'm gonna ask our clerk Sharon Allison to call the role, and then we're gonna uh take the Pledge of Algiance, and then we'll get into the heart of the meeting. Thank you. Councilmember Agnew? Here. Councilmember Jackson. Here. Councilmember Pierce? Here. Councilmember Risser? Here. Mayor Havlin. Here. Uh next is the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of allegiance allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands. Liberty and justice for all. We have a form of meeting agenda for the meeting this evening. As I mentioned, there's one main topic of uh of the meeting. Is there a motion to adopt a meeting agenda? So moved. I second. Jackson movement Ragnarok seconds the adoption of the meeting agenda for this meeting on January 6, 2026. Any further discussion? All those in favor of adoption of the meeting agenda is published, say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, carried. The meeting agenda is adopted. As I mentioned earlier, we have one meeting topic this evening. And I want to again thank everybody for uh being here to discuss this very serious topic of gun violence and the potential passage by this council of a conditional local gun regulating ordinance. First, I want to talk about a process matter, and that is, as Director Benarott has mentioned, if you desire to speak this evening, please make sure that you fill out a card. We're not going to ask you for your address like we used to do in the past. I think for security reasons, you just give us your name. Make sure you give that card to the uh communications director, Director Benarott. And then if you want to use the projector in the middle, or you have some kind of another another presentation you want to uh use that's an electronic form or thumb drive form, let us know that, and we'll get you a wireless microphone. Um I'll hearken back to uh what happened uh uh locally here with uh uh uh at Annunciation Church. You know, our local, our council members have a strong and common sentiment in the aftermath of that gun violence at Annunciation Church regarding being supportive of those families, those students and those school officials affected for a lifetime by the rage of a single person. We have also determined that our empathy and our shared grief are not enough, and that some form of action on the issue of curtailing gun violence is important.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com