Eloy City Council Work Session - June 3, 2024: Boards Consolidation & Zoning Amendments
Eloy City Council Work Session – June 3, 2024
The Eloy City Council held a work session on Monday, June 3, 2024, beginning at 5:31 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. The meeting focused on three interrelated zoning text amendments: consolidating several boards and commissions under the Planning and Zoning Commission, updating the responsibilities of the Board of Adjustment and Planning Commission, and creating a new Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. No formal votes were taken; the council provided direction to return with revisions after a strategic planning session.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Conrad Tolson (Planning Commission member) suggested alternatives: making the Board of Adjustment a function of the city council, and using ad hoc task forces for the airport and revitalization boards rather than full consolidation.
- Alan Crawford (Planning Commission member) expressed support for consolidation, noting that revitalization lacked power, and cautioned that seven members might be insufficient given the expanded scope.
- Frank Forsetto (Airport Board member) submitted a text message read into the record indicating strong interest in serving on a new combined committee and leading any airport subcommittees.
Discussion Items
A. Boards and Commissions City Code Text Amendment
Community Development Director Dan Seimer presented a proposal to consolidate the Airport Advisory Board, Board of Adjustment, Revitalization Commission, and Planning Commission into a single seven-member Planning and Zoning Commission. The rationale included: volunteer shortages (only two active planning commission members, one revitalization member), infrequent meetings (some boards not meeting for two years), and efficient use of limited staff. The consolidated board would create subcommittees for airport/air park, revitalization/historic preservation, and economic development/housing. Council members discussed the need to preserve specialized expertise, term limits, and the timing relative to an upcoming strategic planning session (June 15). The council generally supported the concept but wanted more detail after the strategic plan.
B. Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Adjustment Responsibilities Zoning Text Amendment
Seimer explained this amendment resolves code conflicts and adds the ability for the Board of Adjustment to approve “reasonable accommodations” under the ADA and Fair Housing Act. It also creates an appeal process for subdivision decisions. Council had no questions and agreed the amendment should proceed as part of the larger package.
C. Historic Preservation Overlay Zoning Text Amendment
Seimer proposed a new overlay zone to allow property owners to request historic designation, align with state/national standards, and provide administrative approvals for compatible alterations. The overlay would also allow modifications (e.g., uses, setbacks) to help historic properties remain compliant. Council members discussed potential benefits and concerns about Prop 207 (Arizona’s eminent domain compensation law). Vice Mayor Curtis raised the possibility of creating an entertainment district on Main Street to relax liquor proximity rules. Staff was directed to research the entertainment district concept for the next meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Council directed staff to postpone further action on all three amendments until after the strategic planning session scheduled for Saturday, June 15, 2024.
- The text amendments (A, B, C) and the entertainment district discussion will be re-agendized for the July 8, 2024 council meeting.
- Staff will prepare a downtown map identifying churches and explore the feasibility of an entertainment district overlay.
Meeting Transcript
Yeah, the scary thing, Mary, is I sing karaoke from time to time too. Mayor at 530 whenever you're ready, sir. Good evening. Welcome to night's work session here at Eloy City Council. It is Monday, June 3rd, 2024. Time's approximately 5:31. I call this meet to order. If I can get the roll call, please, Miss Mary. Councilmember Seton. Here. Councilmember Wana Wappa Rodriguez. Here. Vice Mayor Curtis. Here. Mayor Powell. Here. Councilmember Schneider. Here. Councilmember Garcia. Present. Councilmember Toringo. Here. Thank you. If we can all stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, please. And to the republic. All right. We're gonna go straight to item five discussion items, board and commission city code text amendments. Dan. Good evening, Mayor, members of the council, Dan Seimer, Community Development. The item before you today is a discussion item for your direction. It pertains to the regular review and consideration of the exist some of the existing boards. Four of these boards, uh three of them are within the planning and development department. So the overview before you is kind of how I'd be going through the discussion, the purpose, the brief overview, the proposed amendment, and the rationale, and then open it up for discussion. One thing to keep in mind as we go through this discussion, each of these, all three amendments can stand alone. Although as presented in the packet, they all build on each other. So regardless of what you decide on the first one, amendments are necessary for the others. So from time to time, it's good governance for the city council to review its boards and commissions for it to ensure that we're being effective in our manner that they're created. Our volunteers are provide their assets and their time, and it's very important to me and as the community to ensure that their time is spent wisely. Furthermore, many of the boards and commissions that are created throughout the city are are for great reasons, but more importantly, sometimes those boards eventually become ineffective, and not because of lack of participation, but because their time is due. And that happens to be with our historic preservation board uh a few years ago when you consolidated that with the uh revitalization commission. One of the things that we look at from time to time is the proposed purpose and to ensure that we are maintaining the main objective of these boards that you created and to provide guidance to the city council. We review their goals and priorities, their purposes for meetings, and the more challenging aspect is to not overly have meetings as I call meetings beyond meetings, beyond meetings for death. Um all our boards that we're talking about today are as needed, and they meet as an as needed basis. One of the major complaints that I've heard from some of the members is we don't have enough volunteers, and that is true. We currently lost two more members this past week, one from the planning commission and one from the revitalization board. It is difficult to maintain these boards, and I hear this from time to time. Uh they want to participate, but we don't meet enough, or we don't have subjects enough. But as it pertains to these boards, they're so diverse in their planning elements that they're spread so thin that their meanings are still important, but yet we don't have enough purpose or topics to discuss. Furthermore, as we look at the alternatives and goals, we look at our resource allocation. It isn't uncommon for boards and commissions to be staffed by at least two people per board.
openpublica.com