OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Fayetteville, Arkansas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Fayetteville City Council Meeting - October 6, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 6, 2026
BodyFayetteville, Arkansas
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:49:23

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:01

Good evening, everyone, and I would like to call to order the Tuesday October 6th meeting of the Fayetteville City Council.

0:08

Clerk Paxton, will you please call the roll?

0:11

Ms.

0:12

Bunch.

0:12

Here.

Speaker 2

0:13

Ms.

0:14

Turk.

Speaker 3

0:14

Here.

Speaker 2

0:15

Minister Jones.

0:18

Mr.

0:18

Stafford.

Speaker 3

0:19

Here.

Speaker 2

0:20

Dr.

0:21

Jones.

0:21

Here.

0:22

Ms.

0:23

Moore?

0:23

Here.

0:24

Mr.

0:25

Weaker.

Speaker 4

0:26

Here.

Speaker 2

0:26

Mr.

0:27

Berna.

Speaker 4

0:28

Here.

Speaker 2

0:28

Mayor Ron.

Speaker 1

0:30

Here.

0:30

Please join me as we recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:53

Okay, thank you.

0:55

First up, we will have our sales tax and monthly financial report.

0:59

Steve.

Speaker 5

1:04

Thank you, Mayor.

1:07

This is the July sales tax report for taxes received in August of 2026.

1:13

In July, we saw taxable sales in the city totaling approximately 285.6 million, which was an increase of 1.5% from uh July of last year.

1:24

Retail trade was down around 1.1% or 1.7 million, and that is our largest source of taxable sales in the city.

1:32

Um normally we're we're looking at around 150 million or so just in that category alone.

1:38

Accommodation and food services, that was up around 13.8% or 4.9 million.

1:44

Utilities was up 15.7% or roughly 2.2 million.

1:49

And we noted that professional scientific and technical services, that category was up 35% or roughly 731,000.

1:57

We also noted that wholesale trade was down around 11.3% or 2.7 million, but all in all, that's gonna put us uh up around 1.5 percent from July of last year in terms of total taxable sales.

2:12

And looking at the actual sales tax collection results, um the city one penny was was up around 1.5 percent or 41,000 compared to last year.

2:23

The county portion to the city that was down around 0.9% or roughly 21,000, resulting in a total combined sales tax collection increase of 0.41% or around 21,000 for the month when we're comparing month to month this year to last.

2:40

Now, when we compare the sales tax revenues to what was budgeted, the city one penny was down around 1.4% compared to the budget for the month.

2:49

The county portion was down around 3.8 percent or 89,000 compared to budget for the month for a combined total for the month of uh July down around 2.5 percent compared to budget or roughly 129,000.

3:03

And cumulatively, that's gonna put the city on a year-to-date basis down approximately 1.4 percent or roughly 581,000 compared to budget through the month of July.

3:14

Uh once again, we do have a couple of our biggest months uh coming up, so I do expect that to level out a bit, but all in all, the sales tax numbers are looking um you know a little bit off compared to what what we had projected for the year.

3:28

So can I answer any uh questions on the sales tax report?

Unassigned speaker

3:38

Oh

Speaker 1

3:38

yes, Ms.

3:39

Moore.

Unassigned speaker

3:39

Sorry, you didn't on when I looked at the yes, I didn't thank you, Mayor.

Speaker 1

3:42

Yeah,

Speaker 6

3:43

apologize on that.

3:44

Um you spoke a little bit to it, uh Steven, but uh we are at sluggish year to date, um, down uh 581,000 year to date to budget, and you said that maybe there's an expectation that we're gonna see a little bit of swaying coming into this last quarter of the year.

4:01

Um can you give us any insight into what drivers you think are gonna um be contributing to that?

4:06

Because especially I heard you say um our retail sales, which is a huge driver of our um number is soft right now, and so I'm I'm curious uh what you're thinking is gonna help to drive that.

Speaker 5

4:18

Sure.

4:18

Well, those and you know, you have to take those retail numbers with the green assault, those do bounce around as we have discussed before and in uh many conversations.

4:28

Um I would say my projections for us kind of evening out for the year are are based on the fact that one we haven't really in these sales tax reports, we haven't factored in for the students coming back yet, and that is one of the biggest things that we do see in the later months of the year.

4:46

And once again, we have the uh the holiday sales coming up over the course of the next few months, and that generally speaking, we do see uh year-to-year increases um and for those as well.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So I'd say between those two things, I do expect us maybe not to make it up fully, but to get closer than where we are.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use██████████████████████████████30%
Stormwater Management█████████████████17%
Procedural████████████████16%
Flood Management███████7%
Public Safety███████7%
Public Engagement████4%
Technology and Innovation████4%
Environmental Protection███3%
Transportation Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Fayetteville City Council Meeting - October 6, 2026

The Fayetteville City Council convened on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, at 5:00 PM. The meeting covered a range of topics including financial reports, streamside protection amendments, conditional use permits, annexations, rezonings, the annual property tax millage levy, fire marshal towing authority, and a prohibition on automatic license plate reader (ALPR) systems. Several items were voted on, with notable decisions including the denial of a cluster housing appeal (thus approving the project), tabling of a streamside ordinance, and unanimous passage of a ban on ALPR systems.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent agenda was approved unanimously by a roll call vote (7-0, with Minister Jones absent).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • B1 (Tanglewood Branch Streamside Protection): Public speakers included Mary Evelyn Jones (artist displaced by previous development), who expressed disappointment with the larger building and requested more art integration; Michael Cohen (property owner on South Gregg), who raised concerns about traffic, valet operations, and road safety; Joe Robson, who argued flooding issues in South Fayetteville are not adequately addressed; Marcia Robson, who criticized the council's practice of suspending rules and urged alignment with citizens over developers; Bob Walker, who voiced concern over rising property taxes squeezing homeowners; and Bo Counts (via Zoom), who supported the project concept but stressed the need for follow-through on stream mitigation and overall city planning.
  • B2 (Cluster Housing CUP at 1919 North Bear Tree Court): Public commenters included Tyler Massey (adjacent neighbor), who warned of flooding risks; Melissa Quinton, who pointed out driveway encroachment on the streamside protection zone; Margaret Britton, who argued the development would degrade water quality; Don Fisher, who cited noncompliance with cluster housing requirements; Michelle Misi (via Zoom), who opposed due to erosion and safety; and additional speakers highlighting drainage and safety issues.
  • B3 (Annexation Flintlock LTD): Multiple residents spoke in opposition, including Bob Castrell, Sam Hampton, Barbara Haworth, Jarrett Cunningham, Aaron Bell, and Garland Yale, citing lack of infrastructure, sprawl, fire access concerns, and incompatibility with city planning goals.
  • B5 (Rezoning 1137 North Oak Drive): Christy Pollock spoke against the rezoning, raising concerns about traffic, parking, drainage, and compatibility with the single-family neighborhood. Two additional speakers on Zoom (Lauren Rosso and Shannon Rayleigh) echoed similar objections.
  • C5 (Rezoning 1915-1927 West Weddington Drive): Winston Parnell, a neighbor, argued the rezoning would exacerbate existing drainage issues. Robert Williams spoke in support, stating that stormwater claims during rezoning are premature and that city staff are capable of proper design.
  • C8 (ALPR Prohibition): Didi Peters (via Zoom) expressed support for the ban but questioned why police do not enforce existing parking laws, suggesting red curbs as an alternative.

Discussion Items

  • Sales Tax and Monthly Financial Report (July 2026): City financial officer Steve presented the report. Taxable sales were $285.6 million, up 1.5% from July 2025. Retail trade was down 1.1% ($1.7 million), while accommodation and food services rose 13.8% ($4.9 million). The city's one-penny sales tax increased 1.5% ($41,000) year-over-year, but the combined (city plus county) collection was up only 0.41% ($21,000). Year-to-date (through July), sales tax revenues were $581,000 (1.4%) below budget. For the monthly financial report (through August 2026), the general fund was up 1.3% ($730,000) against budget, building permit fees rose 32% ($917,000), and the water/sewer fund increased 5.9% ($2 million). The airport fund was down 5.9% ($202,000) due to reduced jet fuel sales. Councilmember Moore asked about drivers for the second half of the year; Steve cited student return and holiday sales as potential improvements.
  • B1: Amendment to Streamside Protection Ordinance (Tanglewood Branch): Staff (Britton Bostick) recommended approval of the conditional removal of 279 linear feet from the streamside protection zone, noting that the revised proposal is substantially similar to a 2025 approval. Applicant Rob Sharp explained the project (Camden Court) is tied to a hotel development and now includes 148 parking stalls and 52 dwelling units with a taller building (5-6 stories). The design includes a trash net, hydrodynamic separator, and public easement. Council discussion focused on ownership of a corner parcel (possibly owned by the city or railroad) and concerns about precedent. A motion to table the item indefinitely was amended to table until January 5, 2027; the amended motion passed 7-0.
  • B2: Appeal of Conditional Use Permit (Cluster Housing at 1919 North Bear Tree Court): Staff (Britton Bostick) now recommended approval after the applicant reduced the number of houses from 14 to 12, moved garages to side/rear, and removed parking from flood zones. Applicant Brian Teague highlighted the design's compatibility with the cluster housing ordinance. Councilmember Moore suggested a condition for stream bank restoration. After debate, a motion to approve the resolution (i.e., deny the appeal) was made by Councilmember Bunch and seconded. The roll call vote: Bunch-No, Turk-Yes, Stafford-No, Dr. Jones-No, Moore-No, Wiedaker-Yes, Berna-No. The appeal failed (2-5), thereby approving the CUP.
  • B3: Annexation of 11.17 Acres (Flintlock LTD): Staff recommended denial; planning commission approved. Applicant Allie Quinlan (via Zoom) addressed questions about sewer capacity, water line replacement, and a second access road through county jurisdiction. Public comment was overwhelmingly opposed. A motion to move to third reading failed 5-2 (needed 2/3), so the item remained on second reading.
  • B4: Planned Zoning District (PZD) Related to Annexation: The council voted unanimously to table this item until the next meeting due to the annexation not advancing.
  • B5: Rezoning 1137 North Oak Drive: Staff recommended approval with a bill of assurance limiting buildings to single-family/duplex/townhomes and a 15-foot setback. Planning commission had denied. Council voted 1-6 against the rezoning (only Stafford in favor), so the ordinance failed.
  • C1: Vacation of Right-of-Way (Millsap Road): Staff recommended approval with conditions. The council voted unanimously to suspend rules and approve the ordinance.
  • C2: Rezoning 4.8 Acres at West 22nd Street: Staff and planning commission recommended approval. The council voted unanimously to approve the rezoning to RI-12.
  • C3: Rezoning 1.98 Acres East of North Star Drive: Staff and planning commission recommended approval. The council voted unanimously to approve the rezoning to RSF-2.
  • C4: Rezoning 1.1 Acres at West Mount Comfort Road: Staff and planning commission recommended approval. The council voted unanimously to approve the rezoning to CS.
  • C5: Rezoning 0.84 Acres at 1915-1927 West Weddington Drive: Staff and planning commission recommended approval. The applicant (Serena Allen) argued the property is suitable for RIU zoning due to its location and gentle slope. Council voted 2-5 against the rezoning (Stafford and Dr. Jones in favor), so the ordinance failed.
  • C6: Annual Property Tax Millage Levy: The council voted unanimously to keep the millage at 6.8 mills (2.3 for general fund, 0.4 each for police and fire pensions, 2.5 for library operations, 1.2 for library expansion). Library bonds are projected to be paid off in 2031.
  • C7: Fire Marshal Towing Authority: Fire Marshal Jeremy Ashley presented the ordinance, which allows certified fire personnel to initiate non-consensual tows of vehicles blocking fire lanes or apparatus access. The council voted unanimously to approve the ordinance, including the emergency clause.
  • C8: Prohibition of Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) Systems: Councilmember Stafford introduced the ordinance, citing privacy and constitutional concerns. Police Chief Reynolds expressed support for a ban but preferred a version with safeguards. The council voted unanimously (7-0) to approve the ordinance, which prohibits city funds and property from being used for ALPR systems, with exemptions for parking enforcement cameras (48-hour data retention).

Key Outcomes

  • B1 (Tanglewood Branch): Tabled to January 5, 2027, by a 7-0 vote.
  • B2 (Cluster Housing CUP): Appeal denied (2-5), thus the conditional use permit for 12 homes (10 new) at 1919 North Bear Tree Court is approved.
  • B3 (Annexation): Remains on second reading; will be considered at a future meeting.
  • B4 (PZD): Tabled to next meeting.
  • B5 (Rezoning 1137 North Oak Drive): Failed (1-6).
  • C1 (Vacation): Approved unanimously.
  • C2 (Rezoning West 22nd Street): Approved unanimously.
  • C3 (Rezoning North Star Drive): Approved unanimously.
  • C4 (Rezoning Mount Comfort Road): Approved unanimously.
  • C5 (Rezoning Weddington Drive): Failed (2-5).
  • C6 (Millage Levy): Approved unanimously, rates unchanged at 6.8 mills.
  • C7 (Fire Marshal Towing): Approved unanimously with emergency clause.
  • C8 (ALPR Ban): Approved unanimously (7-0).

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone, and I would like to call to order the Tuesday October 6th meeting of the Fayetteville City Council. Clerk Paxton, will you please call the roll? Ms. Bunch. Here. Ms. Turk. Here. Minister Jones. Mr. Stafford. Here. Dr. Jones. Here. Ms. Moore? Here. Mr. Weaker. Here. Mr. Berna. Here. Mayor Ron. Here. Please join me as we recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Okay, thank you. First up, we will have our sales tax and monthly financial report. Steve. Thank you, Mayor. This is the July sales tax report for taxes received in August of 2026. In July, we saw taxable sales in the city totaling approximately 285.6 million, which was an increase of 1.5% from uh July of last year. Retail trade was down around 1.1% or 1.7 million, and that is our largest source of taxable sales in the city. Um normally we're we're looking at around 150 million or so just in that category alone. Accommodation and food services, that was up around 13.8% or 4.9 million. Utilities was up 15.7% or roughly 2.2 million. And we noted that professional scientific and technical services, that category was up 35% or roughly 731,000. We also noted that wholesale trade was down around 11.3% or 2.7 million, but all in all, that's gonna put us uh up around 1.5 percent from July of last year in terms of total taxable sales. And looking at the actual sales tax collection results, um the city one penny was was up around 1.5 percent or 41,000 compared to last year. The county portion to the city that was down around 0.9% or roughly 21,000, resulting in a total combined sales tax collection increase of 0.41% or around 21,000 for the month when we're comparing month to month this year to last. Now, when we compare the sales tax revenues to what was budgeted, the city one penny was down around 1.4% compared to the budget for the month. The county portion was down around 3.8 percent or 89,000 compared to budget for the month for a combined total for the month of uh July down around 2.5 percent compared to budget or roughly 129,000. And cumulatively, that's gonna put the city on a year-to-date basis down approximately 1.4 percent or roughly 581,000 compared to budget through the month of July. Uh once again, we do have a couple of our biggest months uh coming up, so I do expect that to level out a bit, but all in all, the sales tax numbers are looking um you know a little bit off compared to what what we had projected for the year. So can I answer any uh questions on the sales tax report? Oh yes, Ms. Moore. Sorry, you didn't on when I looked at the yes, I didn't thank you, Mayor.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com