Franklin Planning Board Special Meeting on B-I Zone Master Plan Re-examination, Jan 14, 2026
Franklin Township Planning Board Special Meeting – B-I Zone Master Plan Re-examination
On January 14, 2026, the Franklin Township Planning Board held a special meeting to consider a Master Plan Re-examination and proposed zoning standards for the Business and Industrial (B-I) zone. The meeting featured a presentation by consultant Dave Roberts of Brightview Engineering, extensive public comment, and unanimous votes to adopt the Master Plan amendment and recommend the draft ordinance to the Township Council.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Dave Robinson (349 Biltmore Lane, Somerset Run, member of the BI committee) expressed support for the recommendations, stating they provide a "reasonable, realistic approach." He noted that a 30-acre parcel at Schoolhouse and Elizabeth would be precluded from warehouse development under the new criteria because it is more than one mile from I-287, demonstrating the plan's effectiveness.
- Debbie Stewart (Farrington Plaza) asked about the floor area ratio (FAR) and whether subdividing parcels could circumvent limits. Dave Roberts explained the FAR applies per parcel regardless of ownership, so subdividing does not increase total square footage.
- Jan Brandt (22 Bryant Court) opposed the master plan revision, expressing concern that it reverses the previous warehouse moratorium and prioritizes developers over residents. She argued that size limits and buffer distances do not mitigate noise, pollution, and loss of quality of life, and warned that legal pressure should not drive planning policy. She questioned whether the study accounted for affordable housing planned nearby and asked about protections from air pollution. Chairman Orsini and others responded that the new standards raise the bar for applicants and that air quality is addressed through prohibition of high-intensity uses, buffers, and setbacks.
- Sally Zaharchak (Constitution Way, Canal Walk) asked whether other New Jersey towns are similarly revising master plans to manage warehouse growth. Dave Roberts confirmed this is a statewide issue and that many towns are using comparable methods.
- Norman Roberts (15 Benjamin Street) questioned whether the police department or traffic officials were consulted regarding enforcement of truck routes and traffic calming. The board noted that traffic regulation is a council matter, but that the steering committee included the township manager and that the plan concentrates warehouses near I-287 to minimize truck impacts on local roads.
- Suthe Shah (74 Brian Court) sought clarification on the one-mile distance from I-287 (road miles, mapped), the derivation of the 0.362 FAR (based on existing built parcels in Franklin), and why medium and high intensity categories share the same loading dock ratio of 1 per 5,000 square feet. Roberts explained the ratios are designed to limit truck traffic, and that medium intensity uses must be below that threshold to remain permitted.
- Kiki Anastasicus (Canal Walk) praised the study as a "darn good compromise" but expressed concern that the 200-foot buffer and 100-foot planted buffer are insufficient to ensure quality of life for residents near warehouses. She also asked how the board plans to address the 16 intersections already at Level of Service F. Chairman noted that low-intensity uses only are permitted adjacent to residential zones, and that traffic mitigation recommendations are included in the study.
Discussion Items
- Dave Roberts of Brightview Engineering presented an overview of the two-prong study: a traffic analysis of 16 intersections and a land-use recommendation. He reviewed the study's origins (2023 ad hoc steering committee), the explosion of warehouse development (37 applications totaling 7.8 million square feet from 2018 to 2023, 34% built/occupied). Key themes from community meetings: need to address truck traffic, air/noise pollution, and steer warehouses away from residential areas. The proposed zoning creates three intensity categories based on square footage and loading dock ratios:
- Low intensity: ≤150,000 sq ft and ≤1 loading dock per 10,000 sq ft
- Medium intensity: 15,000–400,000 sq ft and ≤1 loading dock per 5,000 sq ft (must be within 1 road mile of I-287 interchange)
- High intensity: >400,000 sq ft or loading dock ratio >1/5,000 sq ft – prohibited Additional conditions include floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.362 (ensures minimum parcel size proportional to building size), a 200-foot building setback from residential zones with a 100-foot minimum vegetative buffer, prohibition of loading docks facing residential zones or public streets, and restriction of medium-intensity uses to within one mile of I-287. Both low and medium intensities are conditional uses requiring planning board approval. Mark, the board’s planner, noted that the draft ordinance also includes improvements such as enhanced buffering, irrigation requirements, noise studies for adjacency, truck routing plans, gate management plans, and architectural design standards.
- Board questions focused on how the plan mitigates traffic impacts (Chairman noted zoning, not traffic denial; Roberts confirmed sizes and ratios derive from truck trip projections), the definition of high/low docks (to be defined in ordinance), and the rationale for the 0.362 FAR (based on existing developed parcels to avoid arbitrariness).
Key Outcomes
- Motion to adopt the Master Plan amendment for the B-I zone – Passed unanimously (5-0). Members voting: Theodore Chase, Robert LeCourt, Mahe Rafik, Robert Thomas, Chairman Orsini all in favor.
- Motion to recommend the draft B-I zone ordinance to the Township Council – Passed unanimously (5-0). The ordinance will be transmitted to the council for consideration and potential adoption.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome to the January 14th meeting of the planning board uh in accordance with the open public meetings act pill 1975, Chapter 231. Adequate notice of this special meeting of the Planning Board of the Township of Franklin has been provided. If everyone could please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under the indivisible with liberty and justice for all the okay. So Councilman Ambarrison, Jennifer Ragnow, Charles Brown all asked to be excused this evening. Theodore Chase. Here. Robert LaCoir. Mark Dancing here, Robert Thomas. Chairman Arseni. Here. So tonight's meeting is a special meeting to discuss the business and industry zone zoning standards. So the way this will go, I think, is uh we're gonna hear from Dave Roberts, our consultant. Uh he's gonna go through what these are. Uh we can ask him any questions. Um we'll open to the public for any questions, and then we'll uh we'll vote uh um to send these to council or or yeah or not. So that's that's the way that'll go. So um anywho, um without further ado, Mark, I'll turn it over to Dave, Christine, who however you're technologically doing this. Welcome, Dave. All right, Dave. There, I want you to say hi. Yes, good evening, everyone. Um again for the record, uh my name is Dave Roberts um with the firm of Brightview Engineering, uh consulting firm that uh worked on both the traffic uh analysis and uh the re-exam report, which is my understanding is the public hearing to this evening for um amending the master plan for adopting the the re-examination report for the business industrial zone. Um and I guess uh Mark, if you'd like I can just uh go through the uh a kind of a an overview of the of the what led to the production of the the re-exam report and uh kind of brought us uh to the hearing this evening. Sound good yeah, the floor is yours and uh your uh slide uh shows being is is shown on the screen right now. Oh very good. Um first of all, uh I wanted to this the study that uh was undertaken by Brightview is really a two-prong study. It started with uh a traffic analysis of given of 14 intersections that were identified by the township as being uh critical for analysis for uh for purposes of circulation within the business industrial zone and the business industrial zone being really in two primary areas of the township, uh the northern uh section of the township uh along 287, and then a smaller, a much smaller section of a business industrial zone uh adjacent through 27. Um and it be as the study started in 2023, uh we were provided the opportunity. The township assembled a an ad hoc steering committee, and you can see their names uh represented on the on the initial slide on the screen. Um and uh we want to especially on behalf of Brightview, want to again um thank them for their the time that they um invested uh on behalf of the township as as volunteers uh to give uh valuable insight uh and guidance to us as we uh went through the process and we we met with them uh periodically during the process. Um and then basically the um uh the the to kind of give bring us back because it's been some time has gone by um since we last had this on our our um plate um if you will, but uh really these these uh this images of the brilliant aerial photograph of the township uh on the right side shows both areas of the township uh the image on the left in the upper left-hand corner sort of zooms in on the northern section of the township. But uh to really to just to uh uh re kind of review what we're looking at, um the uh white shaded properties, and these are uh uh G this is from a GIS uh uh uh data layer. The white properties are uh warehouses that are constructed and operational. Uh what you see shaded in green uh were at the time under construction. Um what you saw, what do you see shaded in orange were applications that are pending, and in red, there were there were a couple of sites where apple where applications for warehouse uses were denied. And that's kind of where we were when we uh we started off uh on this journey in in terms of coming up with this land use recommendation for trying to deal with this issue. Um and you can see in the lower left uh lower left-hand corner, just the magnitude of uh this kind of explosion of growth, uh really um carrying over uh during COVID and and then just sort of taking off from there ever since uh between 2018 and and 2023 at the time that the we quantified everything, there were 37 applications uh totaling 7, uh 795,641 square feet of warehouse base. And of that, 34% were 2,770 uh 677,752 had been built and occupied. So that would represent that would represent the white shaded properties. Um the most prominent of those, as you can see in the upper left-hand corner would be the Amazon site. Um really out of this out of the community meetings, there were kind of there was a couple of themes that came from a lot of the comments. And just uh sort of again to review, um, we had uh input that was provided um at the here at these meetings, um, and we uh summarized those in terms of uh a meeting meeting summaries, and then we had steering committee meetings, uh, ad hoc steering committee meetings in between them. And uh really the main themes were as you can see, kind of shown um in the middle there. Uh there are seven several interest several intersections, excuse me, that were references needing to be included. So there's two that came out of the community meetings that were not among the original 14. Um so we spent about another month um kind of uh get collecting the data for those two intersections to add to the traffic study. Um and then another theme that came out of the public comments was it is not so much just the impact of uh of truck traffic uh and vehicular traffic being added to the roadways and to the road network of the township, but also the impact of air on air quality and noise pollution that were that was occurring that was uh being felt by the residential neighborhoods that were the closest to where this development was taking place. And really the last uh kind of main theme was that warehouse uses uh if they're to be if they were to be permitted should be steered away from residential areas. That's kind of a kind of a uh kind of obvious, but uh easier said than done.
openpublica.com