Welcome to the April 3rd meeting of the housing health and education committee.

We'll start with Pledge of Allegiance.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

One nation.

Thank you.

First is the approval of the March 20th committee meeting minutes.

Move for approval.

All those in favor.

Okay, we're good.

We have I have the wrong thing sitting in front of me, is what I have.

So we have continued discussion on the housing work plan.

And the next steps, I believe that is President Nash.

Yes, good morning, Madam Chair, Council Vice President.

We are today continuing our conversations regarding the well, this this conversation really encompasses uh the kickoff of several different policy items within the housing work plan.

Um specifically, I'll turn your attention to the backup.

We have multiple documents provided by uh our director of planning, Gabrielle Collard, who's gonna speak to us, just sort of um providing today a very high-level overview of some of these items.

Um we've begun our work uh on the single room occupancy ordinance, and um Gabrielle has graciously put together information regarding that ordinance, regarding that policy.

We expect that these conversations will continue.

We've uh designated to additional follow-up conversations.

So certainly uh wanna emphasize that this is the beginning of the conversation regarding some of these topics.

Um they're pretty dense.

They're pretty uh there's gonna be a lot of uh back and forth, I would expect information gathering that we need to do uh to prepare ourselves for decision making.

But we did want to move forward, uh, get you know, invite Gabrielle to come speak uh to some of these items.

Um, specifically the policies before you today are primarily going to address uh zoning concepts regarding or excuse me, um policy concepts that address the 30 to 60 percent AMI uh sector.

So if you're following along uh at home and you see that housing work plan document that we have posted in our backup, that's what we're starting our focus on.

Um I believe both uh council member Shacklford and Councilmember McSheen had expressed an interest in doing what we could to bring the private sector to the table, make sure that we were involving them.

So certainly um Gabrielle works very closely with our um development industry, but also we will be reaching out and making sure that they're aware of these conversations so that they can weigh in as well.

So um Gabrielle, if you are good to go, you can um I'll turn it over to you, but I uh the conversation we had sort of asked Gabrielle to be ready for was kind of a recap.

If you remember, we had started this conversation way back.

We had had a work session sometime last year.

Um, so we figured let's just go ahead and sort of recap the policies that we had presented to you then and the information that Gabrielle had pulled together then so that we could begin to move forward.

Good morning, everyone.

Thank you so much.

So um, as Council President Nash said we have you know kind of three different policy topics that we've provided some backup on.

Um I think what would be helpful for for me um to understand from the committee um is what are is our top priority at this point.

Um, you know, I think there are a couple of things to consider in terms of um speed and um ability to move things, you know, certain items faster than the others, maybe um, some are bigger topics.

Um, for example, we have the accessory dwelling unit ordinance is already part of our code.

Uh, we have several years of implementing that and if um and and have learned some lessons and have some ideas about improvements that need to be made to it.

So that might be an item that the council feels can be fairly quickly remedied.

Um conversations about the affordable housing zoning options.

We've discussed, I guess Council President Nash said we had a great discussion on it a couple months back about how to develop specifically targeted zoning regulations to um facilitate and promote uh those private development projects that are are looking for um low-income housing tax credits and um the deficiencies in our existing codes that would maybe facilitate that a little bit better.

So that may be a bit of a broader conversation.

Um and then of course the single room occupancy um provisions, which we don't have any framework for currently.

Uh what we provided in the fact sheet was kind of just an analysis of what we do have in the code, what different things kind of dance around it, but don't really get at it specifically.

So just kind of a baseline of what provisions, what types of um housing alternatives we currently allow for in our code.

Um that's usually the first step in my process of thinking about new regulations is kind of taking stock of what we have now and and how that relates.

Um with that said, is there an area you'd like me to specifically focus on in one of those three to just provide a little more background?

Council member, do you need specific background on any of the three?

Well, in terms of what you stated in regards to some remedies, I would like to look at those.

I know we've talked about the immediate in terms of things that we could change um quickly.

And you mentioned ADUs in particular, um, and did I know SROs, we've had conversations around those in terms of some I won't say use word vague, but peripheral conversations.

But what are some things in terms of what we you've seen that we can remedy right away?

Or that would be I don't want to use the word easy fixes, but quicker fixes, if if if you will.

You know, I think with the ADU framework in place, um, and you know, sometimes you do feel like the stars align, right?

Like things that are happening all very serendipity serendipitous.

Um we've had some recent discussions with real life examples where folks have been looking to explore the area of ADUs, and we have identified possible um you know things that are that are um preventing that.

And I think starting with the conversation of those things on parking is one.

And and it might not be an easy conversation.

I think the frameworks there, but it the the meat of the issue itself um is one that definitely warrants attention.

Um but we've seen that in a lot of existing scenarios to try to establish the additional parking requirement for an ADU may prevent one from happening.