The Government Operations Committee met to continue drafting a resolution to establish the Land Management Code Review Commission (LMC). The committee refined the commission's name, composition, scope, and resource needs, and discussed how to proceed with potential charter amendments. No votes were taken; the resolution will be presented to the full council as a briefing.
Good afternoon and welcome to the February second meeting of the Government Operations Committee. We'll begin with the Pledge of Allegiance. We will begin with our sort of continuation from last week. Last week, if you recall, Council members, we sort of began to answer some policy questions with respect to the land management code commission for lack of a better word. Again, that's just what we've been sort of calling it so we can proceed with our work. So as a reminder, just for from a process perspective, we're not going to make any decisions. To that end, I did include, although I don't see it in the backup. Is it the resolution just one document, Clara? Did we just append them? I don't think it made it just in the future. I don't think it made it to the backup. So let me is on your backup. Maybe I need to refresh. Oh, let me refresh too. So it's not on the I always use the online just because I like to see what the public this happens. I like to make sure the public sees what. So just online it's not connected. So let me. Okay. And for the public that's watching, we'll make sure this uh is added to the online backup on. Sorry for the programming delay. Joe, is your email the same if it was before? That would be really convenient. Okay. So essentially what we have is we have a, and I'm just gonna be very honest, a chat GPT edited version with respect to we took what I did was I took the notes from what uh what our discussion was last week, and we began with a draft and then I edit it accordingly. So there's a couple of things I would like to go through with the committee, and certainly, council members, you can send any additional feedback to my email and we can include that in the backup. Um we are all thrown off. I just did. So just check and okay, and we'll make sure that this gets my apologies that that wasn't posted. Okay. Okay, so just as a reminder, the whereas clauses sort of frame the discussion. So when you have a moment, we'll take a look. Um I expect that when we get to full council, we're gonna wordsmith these. So um I think if there's anything that you see that's glaringly omitted, uh that would be that would be good feedback to include for full council. It's always easier to edit down than it is to add on the fly. And I'm but imagine our fellow council members will have their own feedback as well. So of course the name is been something that we've been running with. Um does anybody have any sort of strong feeling about the name City of Frederick Land Management Code Review Commission. Looks looks good to me. Yep, I think it's good. So the purpose and scope has been edited. Um there was just making sure I'm gonna flag anything that I added that wasn't included in the original conversation. No. So this is the and just jump in, absolutely, Peter. Like, oh, okay, yeah, yeah. No, I appreciate your taking pieces of thread and weaving it in the whole cloth. So I think 11 as a discussion point, 11 commission members is a great start. Thanks. I just picked that from it was more than nine and less than there's no uh there's no uh brilliance here. It's just uh absolutely and and I imagine even the scope um one of the things that was heavily debated when the Charter Review Commission did their work was the scope and ensuring that the scope was tightly defined.