Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Government Operations Committee of the City of Frederick met on October 12, 2026, to review several proposed ordinances and charter amendments. Topics included a mandate for free menstrual products in city-owned public restrooms, overhauls of the city's election system (open primaries, nonpartisan elections, and ranked choice voting), a potential change to the election cycle, and a right-of-first-refusal policy for nonprofits on city land sales. The meeting featured deliberation among council members and public testimony.
Menstrual Products Ordinance
Election System Reforms (Open Primaries & Nonpartisan Elections)
Election Cycle Change
Nonprofit Right of First Refusal on City-Owned Property
Good afternoon, and welcome to the government operations committee meeting. We will begin with a pledge of allegiance. Yes, elections board. We'll make sure that we communicate whatever's discussed here today to them so that they continue to deliberate as well. I know when it when we go to full council, we'll want to get their input and whatever conversations ensue. So we will sorry I had to update my computer real quick. There we go. Okay, so the first thing we have on our agenda is um a proposed ordinance that I drafted with Clara's help uh modeling off of what other jurisdictions have already done way before us uh to provide free and accessible menstrual products in public restroom facilities. It's pretty self-explanatory. Um guess I'm looking for any questions that anybody has, but essentially because it is such a clear-cut thing that so many other folks are doing, and in large part we've begun to do some of this work already in the city. If you well, um some of us that would go into the restrooms have already seen some of these products uh available. So that's great. We don't expect a huge uh adoption curve here. So basically just looking for any questions that anybody has before we move it on to full council. I think it's great. And uh I assume the city would have a venting machine without dollars associated with it that would dispense or something. That's what currently is available, yeah. Yeah, I think it's great. Okay, so looking for a motion to move this forward, move uh I'll move this ordinance to full council for consideration. I'm looking for a second. Second. All in favor? It's three zero. Thank you. Very efficient. Okay. Great job, Clara. And Claire, you did a great job. Uh she worked hard to compare what other folks are doing and make it right size for us. Okay. So the next thing we have are two different proposals for um, they have my name on them, but I know we've as a group discussed them. Uh one concept is open primaries. I I don't know about you all. I listened to uh delegate fairs comments about open primaries. They matched what had been the guidance that we had been given from attorney Gray regarding the ability to for lack of a better word, force someone. I don't really like that language, but essentially to open it up to independence to re to participate in uh party uh primaries. So I feel like we need to get a little bit more clarity there. I I'm still I'm very supportive of the concept. I recognize that if we went to a nonpartisan option that that would negate all of that. So I didn't want to take one off the table before having the conversation about the other. But essentially what's before us today is option one, I guess option one is we do nothing. Option two is we seek to open the primaries and whatever information that we need to gather sp about the specific barriers that might exist to that. Um because I heard that comment and it it sort of matched that there seems to be some case law that might suggest that that isn't as easy as it may seem. But I think we need to be very crystal clear about what that case law is. And then the option option three is that we end the primary altogether and we go to a nonpartisan um option.