OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Frederick, Maryland/City Council Committee Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Government Operations Committee Considers Menstrual Products, Elections, and Property Policy - October 12, 2026

City Council Committee Meetings — Monday, October 12, 2026
BodyFrederick, Maryland
SessionCity Council Committee Meetings
DateMonday, October 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 54:37

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

14:16

Good afternoon, and welcome to the government operations committee meeting.

14:19

We will begin with a pledge of allegiance.

14:58

Yes, elections board.

Unassigned speaker

15:00

We'll make sure that we communicate whatever's discussed here today to them so that they continue to deliberate as well.

Speaker 1

15:08

I know when it when we go to full council, we'll want to get their input and whatever conversations ensue.

15:13

So we will sorry I had to update my computer real quick.

Speaker 2

15:18

There we

Unassigned speaker

15:18

go.

Unassigned speaker

15:21

Okay,

Speaker 1

15:21

so the first thing we have on our agenda is um a proposed ordinance that I drafted with Clara's help uh modeling off of what other jurisdictions have already done way before us uh to provide free and accessible menstrual products in public restroom facilities.

15:35

It's pretty self-explanatory.

15:37

Um guess I'm looking for any questions that anybody has, but essentially because it is such a clear-cut thing that so many other folks are doing, and in large part we've begun to do some of this work already in the city.

15:51

If you well, um some of us that would go into the restrooms have already seen some of these products uh available.

15:58

So that's great.

15:59

We don't expect a huge uh adoption curve here.

16:04

So basically just looking for any questions that anybody has before we move it on to full council.

Speaker 3

16:10

I think it's great.

16:11

And uh I assume the city would have a venting machine without dollars associated with it that would dispense or something.

Speaker 1

16:18

That's what currently is available, yeah.

Speaker 3

16:19

Yeah, I think it's

Unassigned speaker

16:20

great.

Speaker 1

16:22

Okay, so looking for a motion to move this forward, move uh I'll move this ordinance to full council for consideration.

16:29

I'm looking for a second.

Speaker 3

16:31

Second.

Speaker 1

16:32

All in favor?

16:33

It's three zero.

16:34

Thank you.

16:35

Very efficient.

16:36

Okay.

16:37

Great job, Clara.

16:38

And Claire, you did a great job.

16:39

Uh she worked hard to compare what other folks are doing and make it right size for us.

16:45

Okay.

16:46

So the next thing we have are two different proposals for um, they have my name on them, but I know we've as a group discussed them.

16:53

Uh one concept is open primaries.

16:56

I I don't know about you all.

16:58

I listened to uh delegate fairs comments about open primaries.

17:05

They matched what had been the guidance that we had been given from attorney Gray regarding the ability to

Unassigned speaker

17:15

for

Speaker 1

17:15

lack of a better word, force someone.

17:17

I don't really like that language, but essentially to open it up to independence to re to participate in uh party uh primaries.

17:28

So I feel like we need to get a little bit more clarity there.

17:31

I I'm still I'm very supportive of the concept.

17:33

I recognize that if we went to a nonpartisan option that that would negate all of that.

17:39

So I didn't want to take one off the table before having the conversation about the other.

17:44

But essentially what's before us today is option one, I guess option one is we do nothing.

17:51

Option two is we seek to open the primaries and whatever information that we need to gather sp about the specific barriers that might exist to that.

18:01

Um because I heard that comment and it it sort of matched that there seems to be some case law that might suggest that that isn't as easy as it may seem.

18:09

But I think we need to be very crystal clear about what that case law is.

18:12

And then the option option three is that we end the primary altogether and we go to a nonpartisan um option.

18:21

So obviously we haven't considered as a city the nonpartisan option before, so I just want to make sure that everyone knows, like the the many people watching that there was discussion last cycle, last term about the open primaries.

18:36

There was support for it.

18:38

Um but I think you know we're kind of starting anew, but the nonpartisan option was not discussed in from what I can tell.

18:46

So just want to be fair about how I represent that.

18:48

But um open to thoughts about what we do next to get the information that we need to send this to full council, which either option that we would like to send, but open to your thoughts.

Speaker 4

18:59

Um I'm personally not in favor of open primaries just because it forces um people into one side or the other.

19:07

And you know, with that, I hate to say it, but you know, you can play all sorts of political what-ifs with that.

19:12

I I uh jumping ahead to uh council member's uh thing about uh changing election cycles.

19:21

I think

Unassigned speaker

19:23

it

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Elections█████████████████████████████████33%
Nonprofit Governance██████████████████████████26%
Public Facilities█████████████████████████25%
Election Procedures███████7%
Public Engagement██████6%
Procedural██2%
Charter Amendments█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Government Operations Committee Considers Menstrual Products, Elections, and Property Policy - October 12, 2026

The Government Operations Committee of the City of Frederick met on October 12, 2026, to review several proposed ordinances and charter amendments. Topics included a mandate for free menstrual products in city-owned public restrooms, overhauls of the city's election system (open primaries, nonpartisan elections, and ranked choice voting), a potential change to the election cycle, and a right-of-first-refusal policy for nonprofits on city land sales. The meeting featured deliberation among council members and public testimony.

Discussion Items & Public Testimony

Menstrual Products Ordinance

  • The committee reviewed a proposed ordinance requiring the City of Frederick to provide free and accessible menstrual products in city-owned public restroom facilities. The ordinance was drafted by Councilmember Kelly, modeled after existing laws in other jurisdictions. The committee noted that some city restrooms already have these products available.
  • The committee voted unanimously (3-0) to move the ordinance to the full city council for consideration.

Election System Reforms (Open Primaries & Nonpartisan Elections)

  • The committee discussed two potential charter amendments: creating an open primary system and establishing a nonpartisan election system.
  • Councilmember Kelly expressed support for the concept of open primaries but acknowledged legal complexities regarding compelling parties to open primaries to unaffiliated voters. She presented the options as: do nothing, pursue open primaries, or switch to a nonpartisan system.
  • Councilmember Atkins stated she was not in favor of open primaries, arguing it forces voters into a party or allows strategic cross-over voting.
  • Councilmember Bram suggested that ending the primary system entirely and moving to a general election with ranked choice voting (RCV) could save money and increase voter focus. He questioned the benefit of retaining party labels next to candidate names if primaries are eliminated.
  • Public commenter Jim Smersel noted the state law threshold for recognized political parties (10,000 signatures) and raised concerns about the definition of "principal political parties" in the context of an open primary.
  • The committee agreed to await the upcoming Ranked Choice Voting presentation and input from the Board of Supervisors of Elections before forwarding any election reform proposals to the full council. Staff was asked to provide clarity on the legal barriers to open primaries.

Election Cycle Change

  • Councilmember Frame proposed a charter amendment to change the city election cycle, suggesting an off-cycle election would focus attention on local issues rather than national or state-level politics.
  • Councilmember Atkins and Councilmember Kelly both expressed a preference for keeping the current local cycle, accepting lower turnout in favor of voters more engaged with city-specific issues.

Nonprofit Right of First Refusal on City-Owned Property

  • The committee discussed a potential charter amendment to require a right-of-first-refusal period for nonprofit organizations before the city can sell or dispose of surplus property.
  • Councilmember Atkins requested the right be restricted to nonprofits based in Frederick County.
  • Councilmember Bram asked about the specific process for the right of first refusal and the city council's role in property disposition. A 2012 resolution (12-02) was shared outlining the council's role, and the committee agreed to schedule a deeper dive into the document.
  • Public commenter Jim Smersel recommended using "may" instead of "shall" in the property language and creating a standardized process for the nonprofit preview period.
  • The committee decided to gather staff feedback and review existing procedures before advancing the amendment.

Key Outcomes

  • Menstrual Products Ordinance: Approved (3-0) for full council consideration.
  • Election Reforms: No vote. The committee will wait for the RCV presentation and Board of Elections feedback.
  • Election Cycle: No vote. The committee majority preferred maintaining the current cycle.
  • Right of First Refusal: No vote. The committee will review existing property disposition policies and gather staff input.
  • Schedule: The October 26, 2026 meeting was canceled; the next meeting is consolidated with the November 2, 2026 session.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, and welcome to the government operations committee meeting. We will begin with a pledge of allegiance. Yes, elections board. We'll make sure that we communicate whatever's discussed here today to them so that they continue to deliberate as well. I know when it when we go to full council, we'll want to get their input and whatever conversations ensue. So we will sorry I had to update my computer real quick. There we go. Okay, so the first thing we have on our agenda is um a proposed ordinance that I drafted with Clara's help uh modeling off of what other jurisdictions have already done way before us uh to provide free and accessible menstrual products in public restroom facilities. It's pretty self-explanatory. Um guess I'm looking for any questions that anybody has, but essentially because it is such a clear-cut thing that so many other folks are doing, and in large part we've begun to do some of this work already in the city. If you well, um some of us that would go into the restrooms have already seen some of these products uh available. So that's great. We don't expect a huge uh adoption curve here. So basically just looking for any questions that anybody has before we move it on to full council. I think it's great. And uh I assume the city would have a venting machine without dollars associated with it that would dispense or something. That's what currently is available, yeah. Yeah, I think it's great. Okay, so looking for a motion to move this forward, move uh I'll move this ordinance to full council for consideration. I'm looking for a second. Second. All in favor? It's three zero. Thank you. Very efficient. Okay. Great job, Clara. And Claire, you did a great job. Uh she worked hard to compare what other folks are doing and make it right size for us. Okay. So the next thing we have are two different proposals for um, they have my name on them, but I know we've as a group discussed them. Uh one concept is open primaries. I I don't know about you all. I listened to uh delegate fairs comments about open primaries. They matched what had been the guidance that we had been given from attorney Gray regarding the ability to for lack of a better word, force someone. I don't really like that language, but essentially to open it up to independence to re to participate in uh party uh primaries. So I feel like we need to get a little bit more clarity there. I I'm still I'm very supportive of the concept. I recognize that if we went to a nonpartisan option that that would negate all of that. So I didn't want to take one off the table before having the conversation about the other. But essentially what's before us today is option one, I guess option one is we do nothing. Option two is we seek to open the primaries and whatever information that we need to gather sp about the specific barriers that might exist to that. Um because I heard that comment and it it sort of matched that there seems to be some case law that might suggest that that isn't as easy as it may seem. But I think we need to be very crystal clear about what that case law is. And then the option option three is that we end the primary altogether and we go to a nonpartisan um option.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com