Historic Preservation Commission Hearing and Workshop - December 8, 2022
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Historic Preservation Commission Hearing and Workshop - December 8, 2022
The Frederick Historic Preservation Commission held a hybrid hearing and workshop on December 8, 2022, at 6:00 PM at City Hall. The Commission addressed demolition review requests, a partial demolition and addition for a twin dwelling, and amendments to a previous approval for adaptive reuse. All votes were unanimous.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the November 10, 2022 hearing and workshop minutes (motion by Commissioner Sower, second by Commissioner Fitzgerald).
- Entered into the record the administrative approval report noting five administrative approvals in November.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No members of the public offered comments during the citizen comment period or on any specific applications.
Discussion Items
Demolition Reviews
- 507 Elm Street (HPC22-1055DR): Staff recommended not to initiate designation for a circa 1915 American Foursquare brick dwelling. The structure is a contributing resource within the Frederick Historic District but does not individually meet designation criteria. Commissioner Alby noted the property owners are investing in continued use. The Commission voted unanimously not to make an application for designation.
- 257 Dill Avenue (HPC22-1080DR): Staff recommended not to initiate designation for a garage (circa 1922) that had burned. The garage was deemed not individually eligible. The Commission voted unanimously not to make an application for designation, specifically regarding the garage only.
- 220 North East Street (HPC22-1116DR): Postponed at the applicant's request to January 12, 2023.
Case HPC22-1075 (230 East 7th Street) – Partial Demolition
- Staff found the dwelling (circa 1925 twin dwelling) to be a contributing resource. The proposed partial demolition (rear stoop, second-floor porch, basement area way) involves altered, non-historic features that will not impact overall significance. The applicant (Brian Bradfield) agreed with staff. The Commission voted unanimously to find the property a contributing resource.
Case HPC22-1082 (127 South Carroll Street) – Amendments to Previous Approval
- Staff recommended approval for amendments to the rehabilitation of a 1938 former farmer's supply warehouse (contributing resource). Changes involve reconstructing block walls (due to structural issues) with a two-foot setback and adding three fire-rated windows to Building C, based on historical evidence. The applicant (Leanne Lewis, Bates Architects) agreed. The Commission voted unanimously to approve the application as submitted.
Workshop – HPC22-1075 and HPC22-1077 (230 East 7th Street) – Addition
- The applicant presented a two-story frame addition to replace demolished elements. Materials include fiber cement siding, composite wood porch flooring, and solid PVC/composite railing systems. Staff confirmed these materials meet design guidelines and are appropriate for rear additions. Commissioner Sower inquired about precedent for composite materials; staff noted previous approvals for similar systems. Commissioner Fitzgerald raised concerns about setting a precedent for future applications but found the proposed materials appropriate due to hidden fasteners and traditional profiles. The applicant received sufficient feedback to proceed to a final hearing.
Key Outcomes
- Vote on 507 Elm Street: Unanimous (no application to designate).
- Vote on 257 Dill Avenue: Unanimous (no application to designate, specifically for the garage).
- Vote on 230 East 7th Street (partial demolition): Unanimous (finding of contributing resource).
- Vote on 127 South Carroll Street: Unanimous approval of amendments.
- Workshop: Applicant to return for a formal hearing on the addition with final material details.
Meeting Transcript
I'd like to call to order the December 8th, 2022 hearing of the City of Frederick Historic Preservation Commission. Listening devices are available. If anyone would like one, please see Mr. Mark here to your right. The technical qualifications of the Commission and the staff are on file with the City of Frederick and are made a part of each and every case before the Commission. The Frederick City. The Fredericks. Can you guys hear me? The Frederick City Historic Preservation Commission uses the guidelines adopted by the mayor and the Board of Alderman and the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation published by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, and these guidelines are made a part of each and every case. All cases were duly advertised in the Frederick News Post in accordance with Section 301 of the Land Management Code. At this time, I would like to introduce the Commissioners and City staff. From your right to left, we have Mr. Brandon Mark, the Division Manager of Community Planning and Urban Design. We have Commissioners Eva Sower, Commissioner Paul Fitzgerald, myself, Commissioner Kerry Alby, Commissioner Rob Van Renz, and Commissioner Ann Hart. And from the city, we have uh historic preservation planners Lisa Morazic Murphy, Christina Martin Koske, Assistant City Attorney, Mr. Scott Waxter, and our Aldermanic liaison, Ms. Donna Kuzemchak. All applicants and authorized agents and members of the public who wish to speak tonight must be sworn in. Please stand if you are able. If so, answer I do. Thank you. It is the purpose of the Historic Preservation Commission to safeguard the historical and cultural heritage of the City of Frederick by preserving sites, structures, or districts that reflect elements of cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological, or architectural history, to stabilize and improve property values of such sites, structures, or districts, to foster civic beauty, to strengthen the local economy, and to promote the preservation and appreciation of such sites, structures, and districts for the education and welfare of the residents of the City of Frederick. In order to be eligible to vote on an application, it is presumed that a commissioner has made the required site visit and attended any and all meetings at which such applications were discussed. In the event that a commissioner is absent from any such meeting, the commissioner may satisfy the attendance requirement by reviewing the record of that meeting. At this time, I would like to ask if there are any commissioners with statements of eligibility. Okay. Seeing none, um, I would like to begin with uh any announcements from city staff. Yes, I have one. Uh under HPC business, the commission was going to review a request for demolition for 220 Northeaster under HPC 22-1116. Uh the applicant has requested a postponement until the January 12th 2023 hearing. Thank you. Thank you, Ms. Martin Koske. Any other announcements? Okay, seeing none, we'll move to the approval of the November 10th, 2022 hearing and workshop minutes. Um are there any commissioners that um would like to request any revisions or um would like to make a motion to approve the I will make a motion to approve the uh November 10th, 2022 minutes. There is a motion on the floor. Is there a second? I will second. Sorry. I will second the motion. Um discussion on the motion. Seeing none, all those in favor of the motion to approve the minutes, please um signify by raising your hand. And that is unanimous. Moving on to HPC business. Sure. I'd like to enter the entire administrative approval report into the record and note that we had five administrative approvals in the month of November. Thank you very much. Next we will move on to HPC 22-1055 DR.
openpublica.com