Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - March 28, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting - March 28, 2024
The City of Frederick Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) held a public hearing and workshop on March 28, 2024, at 6:00 PM at City Hall. The meeting covered a demolition review, multiple partial demolition and rehabilitation applications, a consent item, and workshop discussions. Key decisions included approval of several demolitions and rehabilitations, often conditioned on replacement plans, and continuances for absent applicants.
Consent Calendar
- HPC24-246DR (607 W. Patrick Street): Demolition review for a circa 1917 dwelling. Staff found the property not individually eligible for historic designation. The Commission voted unanimously not to pursue a designation application.
- Administrative Approval Report: Staff reported that 27 applications were reviewed administratively.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Keith Pearcy (All Saints Street resident): During the workshop, Mr. Pearcy expressed concern about the potential sterilization of the historic district through demolition of industrial/warehouse buildings, and worry about noise from new construction creating a canyon effect along Carroll Creek. He urged preservation of the area's working-class character.
Discussion Items
- HPC24-117 (55 E. Patrick Street – Window Replacement): Initially on consent but pulled by Commissioner Hart. Applicant Kristy Erfurdt proposed replacing a cracked single-pane window with two panes and a central mullion for structural support. Hart argued the full plate glass was a defining element of the storefront. Commissioners Van Rens, Fitzgerald, and Saller supported the change as less intrusive. Vote: 3-1 in favor (Hart opposed). Approved.
- HPC24-055 (216 E. Patrick Street – Partial Demolition): Removal of two rear blocks and a roof opening. Staff found the structure contributing but the proposed demolition elements not character-defining. Approved unanimously, conditioned on HPC approval of the replacement plan (HPC24-056).
- HPC24-123 (170 W. All Saints Street – Demolition of Retaining Wall and Shed): Applicant Blaine Young (Mountain City Elks) described the site as part of a $1.3 million restoration of the historic African American Elks Lodge. Staff found the shed and concrete block wall non-contributing. The Commission unanimously found them non-contributing and then approved demolition, conditioned on the replacement plan (HPC24-170).
- HPC24-125 (173 W. All Saints Street – Rehabilitation): Removal of chain link fence, replacement of non-historic metal door, new window opening, and security camera. Approved unanimously with condition that the camera be installed through the mortar joint.
- HPC24-168 (610 N. Market Street – Demolition of Brick Garden Wall): Applicant not present. Continued to April 11, 2024.
- HPC24-170 (170 W. All Saints Street – Replacement Plan): New shed and retaining wall. Staff recommended approval with conditions (e.g., board-and-batten siding, corrected plans). The Commission engaged in a lengthy discussion about the appropriateness of manufactured stone veneer on the retaining wall, given its historic association with African American neighborhoods. Approved with conditions.
Workshop Items (No Votes Taken)
- HPC23-1260 (69 S. Market Street – Partial Demolition): Applicant Andrew Welker presented revised plans reducing the scope of demolition. Discussion focused on: (1) a vertical wall section on the south elevation – the Commission suggested treating it as rehabilitation rather than demolition; (2) roof replacement – the applicant may need to change the pitch for mechanical systems, but the Commission was open to a deviation if kept below the parapet; (3) rear porch removal – the Commission encouraged paying homage to the porch form in the new construction. The consensus was to workshop the Level 1 replacement plan before finalizing the demolition application.
- HPC24-071 (31 W. Patrick Street – Modify Entry): Applicant Steve Knott proposed replacing a revolving door with a pair of double doors and removing a single door to improve ADA access. The design is contemporary and matches existing storefront fenestration. The Commission requested a manufacturer's finish sample by the April 11 hearing. It will proceed to a hearing.
- HPC24-056 (216 E. Patrick Street – Rehabilitation & Addition): Extensive discussion on the addition and rooftop deck. The applicant (Will Randall, agent Brian Bradfield) presented details on roof insulation, new front entry doors (custom wood), granite step reuse, and a rooftop deck. The deck is highly visible but the Commission expressed conditional support, noting the need to consider deviation standards. The applicant will provide a rendering showing the proposed hotel context. The application will return for a hearing.
Key Outcomes
- Approval of Minutes: February 22, 2024, minutes approved unanimously.
- Consent Item Pulled: HPC24-117 removed from consent and approved 3-1.
- Continuances: HPC23-1262 (77 S. Market Street) and HPC24-168 (610 N. Market Street) continued to April 11, 2024, due to applicant absence.
- Demolition and Rehabilitation Approvals:
- HPC24-246DR: Not to pursue designation (unanimous).
- HPC24-055: Partial demolition approved (unanimous), conditioned on replacement plan.
- HPC24-123: Non-contributing finding and demolition approved (unanimous), conditioned on replacement plan.
- HPC24-125: Rehabilitation approved (unanimous) with condition.
- HPC24-170: Replacement plan approved (unanimous) with multiple conditions, to be finalized at staff level.
- Workshop Directions: For HPC23-1260, the Commission advised refining the demolition scope and presenting a clearer Level 1 plan before the next hearing. For HPC24-071, additional product information is due April 11. For HPC24-056, the applicant will provide a contextual rendering; the rooftop deck will be evaluated against deviation standards at the hearing.
Meeting Transcript
Welcome to the Thursday, March 28th, 2024 session of the City of Frederick Historic Preservation Commission. The technical qualifications of the Commission and the staff are on file with the City of Frederick and are made a part of each and every case before the Commission. The Frederick City Historic Preservation Commission uses the guidelines adopted by the mayor and board of Alderman and the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, published by the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service, and these guidelines are made a part of each and every case. All cases were duly advertised in the Frederick News Post in accordance with Section 301 of the land management code. To begin with introductions this evening. Filling in for our administrative assistant, position currently vacant is the manager of community planning and urban design, Brandon Mark. Commissioner Robert Van Rennes, Commissioner Paul Fitzgerald, Commissioner Ann Hart. And then we have Historic Preservation Planners Christina Martinkowski and Sarah Hoffaditz. And then Assistant City Attorney Iris Anon. And our Aldermanic liaison, uh Ms. Donna Kazumchek. Anyone who has business before the Commission this evening, please rise and be sworn in. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the responses given and statements made in this hearing before the Historic Preservation Commission will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth? If so, answer I do. Thank you. It is the purpose of the Historic Preservation Commission to safeguard the historical and cultural heritage of the City of Frederick by preserving sites, structures, or districts that's that reflect elements of cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological, or architectural history to stabilize and improve property values of such sites, structures, or districts, to foster civic beauty, to strengthen the local economy, and to promote the preservation and appear appreciation of such sites, structures, and districts for the education and welfare of the residents of the City of Frederick. In order to be eligible to vote on an application, a commissioner must have made the required site visit and attended any and all meetings at which such an application was discussed. In the event that a commissioner is absent from any such meeting, the commissioner may satisfy the attendance requirement by reviewing the record of that meeting. It is presumed if a commissioner makes no re no statement at this time that they have done so and are prepared to vote on the agenda this evening. That being said, are there any commissioners with statements of eligibility? All right, seeing none, um city staff, any uh any announcements this evening? Yes, I do have one announcement. Um, our office did receive a request for a continuation for HPC 23-1262. Uh that's an application for 77 South Market Street, and that request is for a continuance till the April 11th hearing. A letter requesting that for that continuance uh was included in the packet. And when um when that case is called, we'll simply make a vote. All right, thank you. Uh moving on to minutes. Um approval of minutes for the February 22nd, 2024 hearing and workshop. Commissioners, any questions regarding the minutes, any uh requests for amendments or changes. Mr. Chairman, I move to approve the hearing minutes and workshop minutes for Historic Preservation Commission. Uh dates for February 22nd, 2024. And I will second. All right. Moved and seconded. Any further discussion. Seeing none, all in favor, please raise your hand. All right, that passes unanimously. Thank you. Moving on to HPC Business. Uh administrative approval report. Ms. Martin Koske. Yes, I wanted to enter the entire uh Ministry of Approval report and want to note that 27 applications were reviewed administratively by staff. Thank you. Thank you. And we have HPC 24-246 DR request for demolition review. 607 West Patrick Street.
openpublica.com