Take it away, Gabrielle.

All right.

Let me we don't we don't need a quorum, right?

So nope.

No, absolutely not.

Yeah.

So let's see, where we are in the world.

So we do have the one consent agenda item and you got the new link um in the PDF.

That was for the West Park Village VFW architecturals, which we reviewed at workshop last month.

Architectural review.

Okay.

Exactly.

That's all that is.

Yeah.

Not that's all that is, but um, that was the architectural review.

Um at the workshop, um the applicant raised the fact that she didn't feel that they complied with the full element for entryways and windows because their um front uh entrance actually popped out of the front instead of being a recessed entry, like the element requires.

Uh, and that's an intended to create, you know, if you pictured like a streetscape like North Market Street, right?

To create that variability in the street wall.

Um so a little different in this context, but they actually did revise their elevations to recess the entryway by two feet.

So now it's recessed two feet and then into a vestibule.

So they revised it to comply with the um the elevation, the the standard.

Um it doesn't probably make a huge dramatic difference um in the appearance of the building, but um that did get revised.

So because of that, we put it on the consent agenda.

Um, and we don't have any other comments or questions um on our end.

So why is the Rencord architectural review not on the consent agenda?

So they had they have some a little bit of cleanup to do on their elevations themselves.

They have some lettering and numbering duplication.

So because we had that one condition that we wanted them to tweak those, you guys have to take a vote on it.

Gotcha.

Okay.

Ron, do you have any questions?

No questions from me.

Thank you.

All right.

How am I doing with my practice?

That was very good.

Nice to the next we have um two, well, actually, four continuances, but two unfortunately.

So the Madison on North Market project, um, unfortunately, they have a large water and sewer easement that goes through their property.

It is their property, but there is a large um easement, and maybe it's just sewer.

Um, that is actually a Fort Dietrich facility.

There's a line coming through there that belongs to Fort Dietrich.

As they continue to divide design their project, um, the um Fort actually approached them and said, No way, can you do anything within this easement area that might adversely impact our sewer line, even though it belongs to the property.

Um, so it, you know, usually an easement is granting you rights, but doesn't I I haven't seen personally the easement, but usually an easement um, if you're smart, you don't grant an easement that would take away a lot of your own rights, um, especially to such a large swath of land.

Um, but apparently this easement um the the fort feels gives them very much um control over that area uh and they don't want anything potentially impacting that.

Um the applicant was proposing to cross that easement area.

So uh the applicant has chosen to redesign a little bit uh instead of uh taking on the legal question of whether they have the right to use the easement.

I think that um that litigation or conversation would be much more um probably much more expensive and much more protracted um than just kind of rerouting their their sewer uh to go actually now it's gonna head southbound towards the Coke plant.

Uh they might have to install a um like some sort of small pump because it won't have gravity flow, so they'll have to install a pump on the site, pump that south towards the Coke property, at which point it would go into some sort of transition main and then uh get into our city's gravity sewer.

So there would be some public or some private infrastructure involved.

With that being said, um, unfortunately, what that had the adverse impact of doing is messing up some of the assumptions that their APFO certificate for sewer was based on.

Oh, okay.

Right, because you you you figure, okay, this is this is how much sewer we're producing, this is the directions it's going, and this is the infrastructure that's being impacted.

Now it's going another way into another connection.

So the applicant has um they've been very proactive in getting us new um data to to crunch those numbers with the new impacted infrastructure.

Uh they've submitted those to our engineering department and the engineering department is reviewing those to reissue a certificate, basically, to evaluate that and reissue the certificate.

So, in addition to the certificate, uh the other thing and why we want to continue it and why it wouldn't be good just to condition the plan on it is we want to make sure that any of those uh adjustments to the sewer infrastructure doesn't mess with things on the site, right?

You know, we don't like to um you know get the plan approved and then see, oh, now you have to move this, and it changes all this landscaping and everything kind of dominoes sometimes.

Uh so best to understand exactly any impacts as limited as they may be how you know, landscaping parking, if you're shifting, you know, things left or right.

So I think the applicant, um I think they they are very excited about their project.

I think they intend on attending on Monday night just to be there in case there are any questions.