Frederick Planning Commission Workshop – September 15, 2025
Frederick Planning Commission Workshop – September 15, 2025
The Frederick Planning Commission held a workshop on September 15, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in City Hall. The workshop covered revisions to the Frederick Commerce Center South development, a zoning text amendment to allow residential uses on the first floor of certain mixed-use buildings, a recommendation letter on MU phasing, and updates to the commission's Rules of Procedure. No formal votes were taken; discussions set direction for future hearings and staff actions.
Frederick Commerce Center South – Preliminary Plat and Forest Conservation Plan (PC25-395PSU / PC25-396PFCP)
- The applicant (Trammel Crow Company / Kimley-Horn) presented revisions to consolidate lots and reconfigure forest conservation areas to accommodate a specific end user. They noted that a previously active bald eagle nest is now inactive.
- The site will continue to meet annexation conditions and prior approval conditions. APFO certificates have been issued. A private forest main for sewer will be required.
- Staff confirmed that the archaeological assessment is complete and that APFO certificates will need to be revalidated before the hearing.
- The case is scheduled for a hearing on November 10, 2025.
Frederick Commerce Center South Lot 4 – Final Site Plan (PC25-397FSI)
- The applicant presented a site plan for a ±225,000 sf warehouse and logistics building with two auxiliary structures (6,300 sf total). The plan includes 264 EV charging spaces and eliminates the direct connection to Gas House Pike.
- The applicant noted ongoing discussions with staff regarding a potential parking modification for delivery van areas, and a possible lighting modification for spillover onto adjacent logistics uses.
- Staff indicated that stormwater approval is pending and that APFO certificates must be obtained before the hearing. Additional comments were added after the DRC meeting; the applicant will address them in the next submission.
- The case is also scheduled for the November 10, 2025 hearing.
Zoning Text Amendment – Section 838 (Table 838-1) Use Regulations (PC25-249ZTA)
- The applicant (Offit Kurman on behalf of the Brickworks development) proposed adding “residential” as a permitted first‑floor use in MU‑1 and MU‑2 zones for buildings where the site plan covers more than three acres. The current code only lists retail, office, and industrial.
- The applicant argued the change would allow modest amounts of non‑residential ground‑floor activity alongside residential units, improving activation and design flexibility for large projects.
- Commissioners expressed support for the concept but raised concerns about the absence of design guidelines, the need for parameters (e.g., minimum amounts of active use, street classification requirements), and whether a simple “residential” addition without qualifiers is sufficient.
- Staff noted that existing design guidelines separate commercial and residential treatments, and that street‑classification requirements for active uses (50% on certain streets) could be relevant. They also cited precedent in the downtown business district for partial conversions of ground floors to residential.
- The commission directed staff to refine the amendment with more specific standards before it returns for further discussion.
MU Phasing Text Amendment – Recommendation Letter
- Staff had prepared a letter to the City Council regarding a proposed text amendment to modify mixed‑use phasing requirements. The commission discussed revisions.
- The commission agreed to recommend retaining the current 75‑25 phasing structure but called for adding a modification provision that would allow an applicant to request an alternative schedule based on economic data and justified findings.
- The letter will be finalized through staff: commissioners may send minor comments to staff, who will compile them and present a final version to the Chair for signature. If substantive disagreements arise, the matter will be brought back to a public meeting.
Rules of Procedure – Discussion and Planned Training
- The commission reviewed updated draft Rules of Procedure, including new sections on attendance requirements (50% minimum, per state law), the role of alternate members, and provisions for pre‑planning commission meetings where general information and training topics may be presented.
- A significant portion of the discussion focused on the quasi‑judicial role of the commission, particularly the prohibition on independent research of facts. Commissioners raised concerns about situations where they feel additional information is needed and have had difficulty obtaining it from staff in a timely manner.
- Staff acknowledged past communication issues (e.g., the Co‑Star report) and committed to clarifying processes. Commissioners urged a clearer policy for when the commission can request information and what staff’s responsibility is to flag inaccurate statements from applicants.
- The commission decided to schedule a formal training session on quasi‑judicial decision‑making and proper motion language. The training will take place at the October workshop (in‑person) and will also include the new incoming commissioner.
- The commission expressed strong dissatisfaction with late packet deliveries and indicated that cases not ready in time for proper review may be pulled from the hearing agenda.
- No vote was taken on the Rules of Procedure; the discussion will continue at a future workshop after the training.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken; all items remain in progress.
- The Frederick Commerce Center South preliminary plat and final site plan are scheduled for a hearing on November 10, 2025, pending completion of outstanding technical items.
- The zoning text amendment will be revised by staff to include more specific design parameters and street‑classification standards before returning to the commission.
- The MU Phasing recommendation letter will be finalized by staff based on the commission’s direction (maintain 75‑25, add a modification option) and signed by the Chair after commissioners submit minor comments.
- A quasi‑judicial training session will be held at the October 2025 workshop, with the new commissioner included.
- The commission reiterated that late packet delivery is unacceptable and may result in cases being removed from the agenda.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, good afternoon. It's two o'clock, and I'm calling the meeting to order. And I would like to welcome everybody to the September fifteenth, twenty twenty-five workshop for the City of Frederick Planning Commission. Um, before we begin today's proceedings, I'd like to give an overview of the process that we follow, um, since it's a little bit different than the process we use for the hearing. Um, we for each item on our agenda, we start by having the applicant come up and give us a presentation, um, especially focusing on any modifications and the reasons for those. If you're asking for modifications um following the applicant presentation, then we'll have an opportunity for the commission to ask questions, then we'll have staff weigh in and bring up anything that that they need to bring up regarding the application. Again, we'll follow with commission questions. Um, at that point, if appropriate, or if we if needed, we will have public comment um on the applicant on the application. And um, since this is a little less formal, we may have some back and forth discussion if needed. Um let's see. So at this point, there's hardly anybody here, but those of you who are here, um staff applicants and public need to be sworn in if you're going to be making a presentation before the hearing. So at this point, if everybody who wants to make a presentation is sworn in, and I will I'm will stand, I will do the swearing in the raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the responses given and the statements made in this hearing before the planning commission will be the whole truth of nothing and nothing but the truth? If so, answer I do. Thank you very much. So we have a slight change to our agenda today. Um the first case on the agenda, PC 25-246 FSI has been withdrawn by the applicant and asked to be rescheduled. And um, so we will start with um the Frederick Commerce Center South, and then before we get to our discussion on the rules of procedure, we have the letter regarding the zoning text amendment regarding the MU phasing that we're gonna have a discussion of. Um, so we will put that after the discussion of um or item number four, now three on the agenda. Before we start, I would like to let give Christina the opportunity to make any announcements or if there's anything that you feel like you need to say. No announcements. All right. And we will move straight to the first now. The first item on our agenda, which is PC 25-395 PSU and PC 25-396 PF CP preliminary plant and preliminary forest conservation plan for Frederick Commerce Center South. Thank you, everyone. Uh, my name is Joe White Bret. I'm with Trem and Crow Company. You sure to meet you. Michael, a little closer. Oh, yeah, sorry. Joe Whitebird with Tremel Pro Company, joined by Bruce Dean, my colleague Pete Torres, and Sam with Kimley Horn, our civil engineer on the project. Um, so this is Frederick Commerce Center South, which I know you all are very familiar with, having had it up here before. Um, so overall, what we are doing is submitting revisions to our preliminary subdivision plan and our preliminary forest conservation plan. These revisions are driven by we've identified a user to come in and purchase a portion of the property and construct a building specific for their uses. Uh, and as a result, we need to consolidate some lots we've been planning on making, and we need to reconfigure some of the forest conservation areas. So that is what uh the revisions are accompanying them is the site plan for our user. This is their specific building program that they need for operations. Uh with that, you know, I'll talk briefly about the preliminary subdivision plat. As you may recall, um this property was initially annexed back in uh as part of resolution 2322 back in 2023. Uh we're meeting all of the conditions of the existing annexation. And was previously approved in October of 24 with the initial preliminary subdivision plat that we had submitted. We're still meeting all the conditions of that approval as well. Um APFO for both water sewer and traffic has been tested, and APFO certificates have been an issue. All everything we are currently approving is within the confines of those prior approvals as well. Uh logistics park road is a proposed to be extended per the annexation requirement. The location of that road is unchanged as well from the previous plat. So truly, we're just consolidating a couple lots uh that we had previously proposed into one larger lot, referred to as lot four. Well, submitted a preliminary forest conservation plan uh revision. Similar to preliminary subdivision plat. We're meeting all prior approval to conditions.
openpublica.com