Frederick Planning Commission Hearing - March 9, 2026
Frederick Planning Commission Hearing - March 9, 2026
The Frederick Planning Commission met on March 9, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. to consider a lengthy agenda including consent items, capital improvements program recommendations, several final site plans, and a zoning text amendment regarding accessory dwelling units (ADUs). All votes were unanimous (4-0) unless noted.
Consent Calendar
- Approved minutes from February 9, 2026, February 17, 2026 (workshop), and March 6, 2026 (pre-meeting).
- Approved the 2026-2027 Planning Commission schedule.
- Granted a continuance for ZTA PC 25-248 (convenience stores with gas sales, gas stations) to April 13, 2026, at staff's request.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Heather Goddard (East Frederick Rising) urged the commission to consider low-cost painted walking zones on E Street (akin to Maxwell Alley) for safety and accessibility, prioritizing function over beautification.
- Steve Jakupsk (Citizens for Responsible Growth) opposed the two-year extension for Frederick Commerce Center Lot 1, arguing the city should not enable land speculation and that the applicant had three years to secure a user.
- Mita Nash (Frederick resident) opposed eliminating the owner-occupancy requirement in the ADU ZTA, warning that it would enable investor speculation and change neighborhood character without adequate protections for older neighborhoods.
- Linda Dove (Frederick resident) argued that ADUs are not affordable due to high construction costs (e.g., $300,000 for an 800 sq ft unit) and that eliminating owner-occupancy would not achieve affordability.
- Steve Jakupsk (again) reiterated concerns that ADUs would become investment vehicles rather than affordable housing, and urged caution on non-owner-occupied units.
- Ann Ryan (Frederick Housing Solutions Task Force) supported ADUs as one tool to expand housing options but noted that no permits have been issued in five years, indicating a need for incentives and careful policy design.
- Kate McDermott (Westbrook neighborhood) opposed the size increase to 1,200 sq ft and the removal of owner-occupancy, arguing that community character is more than parking metrics and that further study is needed.
Discussion Items
- CIP Recommendations (FY 2027-2032): The commission discussed priorities from the Active Mobility Advisory Committee (AMAC) and staff. Commissioner Temple emphasized function over beautification and supported completing rails-with-trails. Commissioner Temple proposed a motion to prioritize completion of E Street rails-with-trails, evaluate striped sidewalks on E Street if safe, maintain other 2026 priorities, and de-emphasize downtown streetscape plan. Motion voted 4-0.
- Frederick Commerce Center Lot 1 – Extension: Staff recommended a one-year extension (applicant sought two years). The applicant cited market dynamics and a pending ZTA for data centers. Commissioner concerns included enabling speculation and ensuring APFO compliance. Motion to approve one-year extension passed 4-0.
- Sycamore Springs Multifamily Architecturals: Approved two actions: (1) modification to allow square windows (1:1 ratio) – 4-0; (2) approval of architectural elevations with condition to correct window ratio note – 4-0.
- Sycamore Springs Multifamily Final Site Plan: Approved five actions including modifications for access points, parking lot lighting, buffer reductions, and final site plan (all 4-0). Conditions included updating notes and adding APFO exemption date.
- 40 West Booster Pump Station Replacement: Approved final site plan with condition to provide recorded access easement – 4-0.
- Floor and Decor Addition: Approved final site plan with condition to show fire department connection on utility drawing – 4-0.
- Costco Addition: Approved two actions: (1) modification to reduce parking from 644 to 575 spaces – 4-0; (2) final site plan with conditions (sketch plan date, APFO updates, distance notation) – 4-0.
- West Ridge Square (Mixed-Use Redevelopment): Approved seven actions including five modifications (street detail, bicycle parking, parking setbacks, two landscape buffers), combined preliminary plat/final site plan, and preliminary forest conservation plan (all 4-0). A condition was added to consider renaming Riverstone Drive to Hillcrest Drive.
- Accessory Dwelling Units ZTA (PC 25-614): The commission discussed three substantive changes: parking reduction (transit proximity and reduced stall dimensions), elimination of owner-occupancy, and increased maximum size (800 to 1,200 sq ft). Public testimony was divided. After deliberation, the commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval with two modifications: (1) add a provision that no additional parking is required for ADUs in DB, DBO, and DR zones if parking is removed for the ADU; (2) retain the owner-occupancy requirement. The commission also noted concerns about community character and requested council consider monitoring.
Key Outcomes
- Approved all consent items unanimously.
- Approved CIP recommendation letter prioritizing E Street rails-with-trails and evaluating striped sidewalks – 4-0.
- Approved one-year extension for Frederick Commerce Center Lot 1 – 4-0.
- Approved architectural and site plan approvals for Sycamore Springs, 40 West Booster, Floor and Decor, Costco, and West Ridge Square – all 4-0 with conditions as noted.
- Recommended approval of ADU ZTA with two modifications (parking exemption for DB/DBO/DR zones, retain owner-occupancy) – 4-0.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, it is 6 p.m. and we're gonna go ahead and get started. We have a pretty large agenda this evening. So uh welcome to the March 9th, 2026 Planning Commission hearing of the City of Fredericks Planning Commission. Before we begin tonight's proceeding, I'd like to give a little background of the Planning Commission and the procedures that we will follow this evening. Members of the Planning Commission are all residents of the city and are volunteers appointed by the mayor and board of aldermen, now known as City Council. The commission is made up of five regular members and one alternate. Its powers and duties are assigned by the Charter of the City of Frederick and described in Section 202 of the Land Management Code. All of tonight's cases have been appropriately advertised pursuant to Section 301 of the Land Management Code, and cases tonight will be presented to the Planning Commission in the following format. Introduction of the case, presentation of the case, and initial recommendation by staff, commission questioning of staff, applicant or authorized agent remarks regarding the case, commission questioning of the applicant, public comment, applicant response to public comment, commission discussion and questions, and finally commission action. In support of the planning commission, staff members from the city's planning or engineering and legal departments are all in attendance. Anyone wishing to speak publicly tonight regarding any application, including members of the public, must be sworn in prior to giving their comments. For the record, members of the public will have three minutes to give comments, and anyone representing a group will have 10 minutes to give comments. If so, answer I do. All in favor. Aye. Aye. So that is an approval of the February 9th, 2026 Planning Commission minutes. Next, I'm looking for a motion for approval of the February 17th, 2026 Planning Commission workshop minutes. Motion to approve the February 17, 2026 Planning Commission workshop minutes. Second. That is a motion by Commissioner Temple, a second by Commissioner Roby. All in favor. Aye. That's approval of the February 17th, 2026 Planning Commission workshop minutes. And finally, I'm looking for a motion for approval of the March 6, 2026 pre-planning commission meeting minutes. I move for the approval of the March 6, 2026 pre-planning commission meeting minutes. Seconded. That's a motion by Commissioner Buono, a second by Commissioner Temple. All in favor? Aye. Aye. That's approval of the March 6, 2026 pre-planning commission meeting minutes. Next, any public hearing consent items. I don't think we have any. Um we do have our next item is a continuance, Section 404, Table 404-1, use matrix, section 816, convenience stores with gas sales, and section 824 gas stations and gas sales, PC 25-248 ZTA zoning text amendment. That applicant is requesting a continuance to the April 13th, 2026 Planning Commission hearing. This is asking for a continuance, uh, simply to allow staff more time to analyze the proposal and to provide to you an adequate report. Okay. Do we need a motion to approve the continuance? Okay. So I'll be looking for a motion for the continuance till April 13th, 2026. I motion to approve the continuance of the Section 404, Table 404-1 use matrix, section 816, convenience stores with gas sales and section 824 gas stations and gas sales, PC 25-248 ZTA until the April 13th, 2026 Planning Commission hearing. And I second it. Okay, that's a motion by Commissioner Temple, a second by Commissioner Buono. All those in favor? Aye. Continuance has been granted till April 13th, 2026. So next we have some miscellaneous items, the first of which is approval of the 2026 through 2027. Planning Commission schedule.
openpublica.com