OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Frederick, Maryland/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning Commission Workshop on Hood College, Winpenny Annexation, and Data Center Zoning - September 21, 2026

Planning Commission — Monday, September 21, 2026
BodyFrederick, Maryland
SessionPlanning Commission
DateMonday, September 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:51:04

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

The City of Frederick Planning Commission.

0:02

Before beginning today's proceedings, I'd like to give an overview of the process we will follow today since it is different than the process we use for our hearings.

0:10

For each item on our agenda, we will start the conversation with the applicant by having them come up to the front table and walk us through their project.

0:18

For those of you new to the process, we do ask that you provide a thorough overview of your application, specifically addressing any modifications that you are requesting.

0:27

Following the applicant presentation, the commission will then ask any questions of the applicant, and then we will ask staff to add their comments on the application, followed by commission questions and comments to staff.

0:39

And after the staff presentation, we may go back to the applicant for additional questions.

0:44

We will then ask for public comment, and if needed, we will go back to the applicant and or staff with additional questions.

0:50

Anyone wishing to make public comment is asked to sign up on the sheet provided on the table just inside the door.

0:57

And when taking public comment, we will invite people up in the order on the sign-up sheet.

1:02

Then anyone who is not signed up will be given the opportunity to comment.

1:06

Before beginning your public comments, please give your name and address and note that public comments are limited to three minutes.

1:12

You'll be able to see the timer to your left.

1:15

The light will turn yellow when you have 30 seconds remaining and red when time is up.

1:19

Anyone speaking publicly at the meeting regarding any application must be sworn in prior to giving their remarks, including the applicant, city staff, and members of the public.

1:29

Therefore, at this time, I ask that anyone giving who anticipates giving comment or testimony on any agenda item please stand to be sworn in.

1:42

Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the responses given in the statements made in this hearing before the planning commission will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

1:50

If so, answer I do.

1:52

Thank you.

1:53

All right.

1:54

The first item on our agenda is Hood College, Hudson Hall, PC 26-151 FSI, final site plan PC 26-152 FSCB, the combined forest stand delineation, and preliminary forest conservation plan.

2:10

And with that, I would ask that the applicant please come forward.

2:52

The project consists primarily of uh an interior renovation to the existing building to support the college's ongoing educational and campus needs.

3:03

The proposed site improvements are limited in scope and are intended to enhance accessibility, infrastructure, and environmental performance while maintaining the existing character of the site.

3:25

The associated site improvements include removal of miscellaneous cell features adjacent to the building that are no longer required, uh relocation of the existing emergency generator and cooling tower equipment.

4:01

Relocation of the existing trash enclosure to improve said functionality and circulation, construction of a new concrete ramp to improve AD accessibility and provide enhanced loading dog access to the building.

4:18

Also uh we're doing installation of exterior waterproofing and drainage improvements to address localized drainage concerns adjacent to the building.

4:34

The improvements will also include uh construction of a microbior attention facility to provide stormwater management, treatments, and improve water quality runner from the site.

4:46

We also restriping uh the existing parking area.

4:52

Adjacent to Evergreen Avenue and reconfiguration of parking along the west side of the building along here, uh resulting in five additional parking spaces.

5:04

Um in summary, the proposed improvements uh enhance access accessibility, update campus infrastructure, and um improve stormwater management and support Hood Colleges along term operational needs while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding campus and neighborhood.

5:28

We respectfully request the planning commission support and happy to answer any questions.

5:36

Thank you.

5:37

Um go ahead and do a quick roll call for questions, starting with Commissioner Temple.

5:45

No questions for the applicant at this time.

5:48

Okay.

5:48

Commissioner Robey.

5:57

What I want to talk about is modification one, which wasn't discussed much here, where you want to reduce the access road from 15 feet to 11 feet.

6:11

Uh I guess what I want to have considered is the use of parallel parking, perhaps rather than angle parking that would allow you to probably achieve closer to the 15 foot desired for maneuverability and safety purposes in that location.

6:34

The uh the reduction in um in WIF is actually um uh happening right around here along the uh the the west side of the building.

6:47

And um, you know, we're sort of uh there's no parking located in this area right now.

6:54

Uh so we are adding five additional spots.

6:57

Um so uh that could be something of consideration that we could look into as to make them parallel instead of angled.

7:07

Yeah, I I was concerned about reducing safety and mood maneuverability artificially.

7:16

The 15 foot was put in there intentionally in the land management code.

7:21

And uh I'd like to see every effort made to try to maintain that flexibility.

7:27

Okay.

7:27

Thank you.

7:30

Commissioner Montes?

7:32

No questions for the applicant at this time.

7:34

Okay, and I have no questions for the applicant either.

7:37

Um with the exception of on modification request two, um, with the light spillover, is there anything else that can be done to reduce that more?

7:47

I realize it's one household, but that's one household.

7:51

Um we can um look at right now.

7:57

We uh redirecting the lights uh to not shine directly over onto the adjacent properties.

8:04

Um we're getting uh you know some food candle um illumination along the sidewalk areas, which will, you know, is benefiting the pedestrians, you know, um in that area for safety.

8:18

Um I believe the light spillover um you know extends, doesn't extend all the way across the street to uh to the residential properties.

8:28

You know, so I I I think we are achieving the zero foot candles at the pro that property line.

8:35

Okay.

8:36

That's great.

8:36

And and I do appreciate um, you know, the additional light on the sidewalks for safety.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Data Center Sustainability███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Zoning And Land Use██████████10%
Public Comment████████8%
Annexation███████7%
Planning Commission Training██████6%
Site Plan Approval█████5%
Historic Preservation████4%
Noise Ordinance███3%
Procedural██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning Commission Workshop on Hood College, Winpenny Annexation, and Data Center Zoning - September 21, 2026

The Frederick Planning Commission held a workshop on September 21, 2026, to discuss three agenda items: a final site plan for Hood College's Hodson Hall, the annexation of the Winpenny II property, and a proposed zoning text amendment (ZTA) for critical digital infrastructure facilities (data centers). Commissioners reviewed applicant presentations, posed questions, and received staff and public input. No formal votes were taken; the commission will make recommendations to the City Council at future meetings.

Hood College, Hodson Hall (PC26-151FSI, PC26-152FSCB)

  • Applicant Adtek presented a proposal for interior renovations and limited site improvements to enhance accessibility, infrastructure, and stormwater management, including a new concrete ramp, relocation of emergency generator and cooling tower, restriping parking to add five spaces, and a micro-bioretention facility.
  • Commissioner Robey questioned a requested modification to reduce an access road from 15 feet to 11 feet, suggesting parallel parking instead of angled to maintain safety and maneuverability. The applicant agreed to consider the suggestion.
  • Chair Strawson asked about light spillover from lighting modifications; the applicant confirmed zero foot candles at the adjacent residential property line and proposed redirecting lights. Staff requested a lighting plan demonstrating compliance.
  • Staff noted that the forest conservation plan would be withdrawn because the limit of disturbance (13,000 sq ft) does not trigger requirements. Commissioner Temple inquired about piecemealing; staff acknowledged ongoing discussions with Hood College about an overall forest plan but found no issue with this minor change.
  • No public comments were received.

Winpenny II Annexation (PC26-129ANX)

  • Applicant Buckeye Winpenny II LLC seeks annexation of a 9-acre parcel adjacent to the previously annexed 79-acre Winpenny I project (316 residential units). The annexation primarily provides a second road access point and integrates the parcel into the larger development without adding density. All conditions from the original annexation agreement would apply.
  • Commissioners expressed support for the connectivity. A historic home on the property will be preserved as a residence; staff requested a Maryland Inventory of Historic Places (MIHP) form to evaluate its significance before the next step.
  • Commissioner Temple asked about historic preservation overlay; staff explained that the MIHP evaluation would inform future decisions, and the city's demolition review process already protects historic structures.
  • Commissioner Robey inquired about community benefits; the applicant stated no new proffers beyond existing obligations but remained open to discussion during the process.
  • No public comments were received.

Critical Digital Infrastructure Facility (PC25-626ZTA)

  • Applicant Trammell Crow Company proposes a ZTA to add "critical digital infrastructure facilities" (data centers) as a permitted use in M1 and M2 zones, with restrictions including a minimum 75-acre parcel size, 1,000-foot setback from residential curtilage (increased from 500 feet), 2,000-foot setback from schools, noise limit of 55 dBA, groundwater cooling prohibition, LEED-equivalent design, and post-construction sound studies. The amendment would apply only to four parcels at Frederick Commerce Center.
  • Staff noted the City Council is considering a potential moratorium on data centers (tentatively October 8, 2026 work session), but this does not affect the current workshop.
  • Commissioner Temple disclosed his employment with Hanwa Data Centers and stated he would participate in discussion but recuse from voting on the ZTA, per ethics commission advice.
  • Commissioners raised concerns: Commissioner Robey emphasized the need for a "stop button" to limit data centers, questioned water and power demands (suggesting limits like the county's), and highlighted low-frequency tonal noise. Commissioner Montes argued the use is incompatible with the comprehensive plan (citing land use, sustainability, water resources policies) and should not be permitted by right, supporting staff's recommendation for a floating zone instead. Chair Strawson noted missing information such as the State of Maryland impact study (delayed to late 2026), noise proofing, property value impacts, diesel storage setbacks (calling 100 feet insufficient), and compatibility with comprehensive plan Chapter 7.
  • Staff reiterated their recommendation for a floating zone rather than by-right, citing the need for site-specific evaluation and future implications for M1 zoning.

Public Comments & Testimony (on ZTA only)

  • 13 registered speakers and additional unscheduled speakers all opposed the ZTA. Key points: data centers threaten livability, consume excessive electricity and water, produce harmful noise and emissions (including low-frequency hum), and do not align with the city's comprehensive plan. Several called for a moratorium or permanent prohibition, referencing experiences in Virginia, Ireland, and other jurisdictions. One speaker (real estate broker) offered a balanced perspective, acknowledging the need for tax base but also the proximity to residential areas. Many noted that data centers are heavy industrial (M2) uses, not M1, and that the city should wait for the state impact study.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes were taken; the workshop was for discussion and public input.
  • For Hood College: The applicant will consider modifications to access road width and lighting. The forest plan will be withdrawn. The item will proceed to a hearing.
  • For Winpenny II: The annexation process continues; the applicant will file an MIHP form for the historic home before the next public hearing.
  • For the ZTA: The commission will deliberate and make a recommendation to the City Council at a future meeting. Commissioner Temple will recuse from voting. The City Council will consider a potential moratorium in October. Public comments will be included in the record.

Meeting Transcript

The City of Frederick Planning Commission. Before beginning today's proceedings, I'd like to give an overview of the process we will follow today since it is different than the process we use for our hearings. For each item on our agenda, we will start the conversation with the applicant by having them come up to the front table and walk us through their project. For those of you new to the process, we do ask that you provide a thorough overview of your application, specifically addressing any modifications that you are requesting. Following the applicant presentation, the commission will then ask any questions of the applicant, and then we will ask staff to add their comments on the application, followed by commission questions and comments to staff. And after the staff presentation, we may go back to the applicant for additional questions. We will then ask for public comment, and if needed, we will go back to the applicant and or staff with additional questions. Anyone wishing to make public comment is asked to sign up on the sheet provided on the table just inside the door. And when taking public comment, we will invite people up in the order on the sign-up sheet. Then anyone who is not signed up will be given the opportunity to comment. Before beginning your public comments, please give your name and address and note that public comments are limited to three minutes. You'll be able to see the timer to your left. The light will turn yellow when you have 30 seconds remaining and red when time is up. Anyone speaking publicly at the meeting regarding any application must be sworn in prior to giving their remarks, including the applicant, city staff, and members of the public. Therefore, at this time, I ask that anyone giving who anticipates giving comment or testimony on any agenda item please stand to be sworn in. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the responses given in the statements made in this hearing before the planning commission will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth? If so, answer I do. Thank you. All right. The first item on our agenda is Hood College, Hudson Hall, PC 26-151 FSI, final site plan PC 26-152 FSCB, the combined forest stand delineation, and preliminary forest conservation plan. And with that, I would ask that the applicant please come forward. The project consists primarily of uh an interior renovation to the existing building to support the college's ongoing educational and campus needs. The proposed site improvements are limited in scope and are intended to enhance accessibility, infrastructure, and environmental performance while maintaining the existing character of the site. The associated site improvements include removal of miscellaneous cell features adjacent to the building that are no longer required, uh relocation of the existing emergency generator and cooling tower equipment. Relocation of the existing trash enclosure to improve said functionality and circulation, construction of a new concrete ramp to improve AD accessibility and provide enhanced loading dog access to the building. Also uh we're doing installation of exterior waterproofing and drainage improvements to address localized drainage concerns adjacent to the building. The improvements will also include uh construction of a microbior attention facility to provide stormwater management, treatments, and improve water quality runner from the site. We also restriping uh the existing parking area. Adjacent to Evergreen Avenue and reconfiguration of parking along the west side of the building along here, uh resulting in five additional parking spaces. Um in summary, the proposed improvements uh enhance access accessibility, update campus infrastructure, and um improve stormwater management and support Hood Colleges along term operational needs while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding campus and neighborhood. We respectfully request the planning commission support and happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Um go ahead and do a quick roll call for questions, starting with Commissioner Temple. No questions for the applicant at this time. Okay. Commissioner Robey. What I want to talk about is modification one, which wasn't discussed much here, where you want to reduce the access road from 15 feet to 11 feet. Uh I guess what I want to have considered is the use of parallel parking, perhaps rather than angle parking that would allow you to probably achieve closer to the 15 foot desired for maneuverability and safety purposes in that location. The uh the reduction in um in WIF is actually um uh happening right around here along the uh the the west side of the building. And um, you know, we're sort of uh there's no parking located in this area right now. Uh so we are adding five additional spots. Um so uh that could be something of consideration that we could look into as to make them parallel instead of angled. Yeah, I I was concerned about reducing safety and mood maneuverability artificially. The 15 foot was put in there intentionally in the land management code. And uh I'd like to see every effort made to try to maintain that flexibility. Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Montes? No questions for the applicant at this time. Okay, and I have no questions for the applicant either.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com