OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Gilbert City Council Study Session on Bike Safety and Water Rates, August 26, 2025

Town Council MeetingsTuesday, August 26, 2025
BodyGilbert, Arizona
SessionTown Council Meetings
DateTuesday, August 26, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:59:24

Transcript — Verbatim
9:20

Okay, I'd like to um call orders study session.

9:39

Council Member Kenny Bucklin's Council Member Yan Koprowski.

9:44

Council Member Monty Lyons.

9:46

Council Member Jim Torres.

10:07

Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.

10:09

I'm Mike Angstead with the police department.

10:15

Just take us a second here to get the presentation up.

11:12

Council, I know you've got a packed agenda today, so I'm if you don't mind, I'll just start talking through the slides that would normally be up on the presentation.

11:20

So I'm here today to talk about bikes, help bike helm, bike safety, and potentially an ordinance having to do with bike helmets.

11:28

There we go.

11:30

Kind of an overview, as many of you probably noticed as you drive around Gilbert, uh, if we were to go out on the roads today, you'd see the use of e-bikes is really surged in recent years.

11:40

Uh they're popular alternative mode of transportation, and we're we have a concern or vested interest in these these bikes of all kinds.

11:49

Um in terms of enforcing the laws and and regulations and making sure that people are safe as they operate on our roadways and sidewalks.

11:56

Um I raised two high school, you know, teenage boys.

12:00

Uh they're grown now, but there was a time where we wanted to get them out of the house and off of Xbox and you know go breathe fresh air and ride bikes.

12:07

And uh that's happened, but a lot of them ride not only just regular bikes, but nowadays e-bikes.

12:13

Um these e-bikes in Gilbert uh have become you know kind of a rising challenge for us in terms of safety, and uh we're committed to uh solving the issue with mayor and council.

12:24

It's really not something we can solve overnight, and really the the town has taken a strategy over many decades to try and uh use a combination of engineering, uh education, trying to promote uh bicycle safety, the use of helmets, and then uh lastly enforcement, but any one of those components, um if we don't have all of them working in in conjunction together, uh we were relatively ineffective.

12:48

So it's a multifaceted strategy.

12:51

The agenda for tonight is to kind of talk about community feedback.

12:55

We do a lot of surveys and gather a lot of data from the community in terms of what they were interested in regarding bike safety, and then uh second point we're gonna get into uh a series of slides that talk about bike safety efforts in Gilbert, not only uh from an engineering perspective, but also from an educational perspective.

13:13

We'll get into crash and injury data, and then last there will be some ordinance options, and they're not exclusive.

13:20

Really, it's it's if you all feel like an ordinance in any way is uh a good idea, then that's great.

13:26

I try to stay in my lane being in the executive branch of government, and you being the legislative, um, I won't make a necessarily persuasive argument to you, rather than you know, rather I'll just leave it in your hands in terms of an option.

13:39

So, first off, community feedback.

13:42

Um, the number one takeaway from our 2022 transportation master plan when we asked the community what they wanted.

13:48

Uh overall, it was improving safety for all users.

13:51

Number two is reducing travel congestion on roads.

13:54

I think we can all get behind number one and two.

13:56

70% of our population wanted more separation between bikes and cars.

14:02

67% were more likely to bike with uh more green bike lanes, which we're gonna get to later in this presentation.

14:09

51% wanted safer and easier crossings, and 48% wanted more connections to bikes and trails, and lastly, 45% of our folks wanted more bike lanes, trails, and paths.

14:23

In terms of our current bike safety efforts, um, you know, I think we we listened to the public.

14:31

Um not only did we do a lot of engineering uh changes and efforts that we're gonna get into, but one of the education uh efforts we did is this know your ride campaign, the police department launched uh this month, and some of it is just to educate parents on these different devices and the impact that they have in our community.

14:51

Um as a parent, uh reading state law can be kind of cumbersome.

15:01

But if I was to take all the different variations of e-bikes and bring them in here right now, we would all have a really hard time telling one device from the other, and I would have a hard time, and this is what I do for a living.

15:14

The challenge is that when you look at this matrix, it talks about a bicycle, like an old Schwin or Huffy.

15:20

And then next to it, it talks about an e-bike class one, class two, and class three.

15:26

All of these are born as bicycles.

15:28

If there's if the battery isn't charged on them, you can ride them, you can pedal them like a normal bike.

15:33

The difference being if a parent was to ask me, well, what's the difference between all of them?

15:37

The class one bike is a bike that you can sit on, and when you hit the throttle for the electrical part, uh it won't do anything unless you start to pedal.

15:45

And then it kicks in and it assists the rider going down the roadway.

15:50

Uh you can go up to 20 miles per hour on that device.

15:53

A class two e-bike is different.

15:55

When you sit on it and you hit the throttle, it takes off, uh, kind of like a scooter, maybe like a bird scooter kind of thing.

16:02

You don't have to pedal.

16:03

You can sit there and just keep the pedals level and just use the motor the entire time.

16:08

It also goes 20 miles per hour max, and then it shuts off.

16:12

Class three e-bike is very similar to the class one in that you have to pedal the pedals to make it go, and then the motor kicks in and it can't it'll go up to 28 miles an hour.

16:23

Um, the other difference is a class three e-bike, because it goes 28 miles an hour, you have to be at least 16 years old to uh to ride the device.

16:32

The last uh column there is for electric motorcycles and um completely different category than what we're talking about tonight.

16:40

And I say that because there not only are those considered a motor vehicle, so they fall into a completely different part of law, but it's already um against the law to operate a motorcycle of any kind and not wear a helmet under the age of 18.

16:55

And again, you have to be 16 years old to legally ride a motorcycle.

17:01

Speaking of motorcycles, uh another one of the pieces of information that we try to get out to uh parents is that uh when you see this type of device on the screen featured here, it looks a lot like a class one, two, or three e-bike, like an electrical electric bicycle, but it's not.

17:20

It doesn't have pedals, you can't ride it like a bike.

17:23

It actually doesn't do anything if it's not charged up.

17:26

But it in terms of the law, it's exactly like buying your kid a Harley Davidson, whether it's gas powered or electric, hardly makes an electric motorcycle as well.

17:36

Uh you can't operate this without all of the things that you would need if you were operating a motor vehicle.

17:42

This slide talks about these being modified to go up to 70 miles per hour.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Water And Wastewater Management████████████████████████████████████████40%
Transportation Safety████████████████████████████████32%
Public Safety█████████9%
Active Transportation████████8%
Budget Equity Analysis██████6%
Public Engagement███3%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Gilbert City Council Study Session on Bike Safety and Water Rates

On August 26, 2025, the Gilbert City Council held a study session to discuss bike and e-bike safety, potential helmet ordinances, and a comprehensive update on water rates, consumption, revenues, and infrastructure projects. The session included presentations from Police Department and Water Services staff, with council members deliberating on next steps.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Carter (high school student): Provided statistics on e-bike safety to staff prior to the meeting. Councilmember Bon Giovanni acknowledged and thanked Carter for his contribution.

Discussion Items

  • E-Bike and Helmet Safety Presentation (Mike Angstead, Police Department):

    • E-bike use has surged in Gilbert. Community feedback from the 2022 Transportation Master Plan showed 70% wanted more separation between bikes and cars, 67% favored green bike lanes, 51% wanted safer crossings, 48% wanted more trail connections, and 45% wanted more bike lanes/trails/paths.
    • The town has invested $215 million in safety improvements (e.g., wider bike lanes, green bike lanes, safer canal crossings, traffic signals).
    • Crash data: Total vehicle-bicycle collisions declined (50 in 2022, 65 in 2023, 48 projected for 2024), but juvenile-involved crashes now outpace adult crashes for the first time. Non-vehicular bicycle crashes (EMS responses) among juveniles rose from 1 in FY23 to 12 in FY25.
    • Helmet effectiveness: Reduces head injuries by 48% and serious head injuries by 60%. Data from the CDC (via NHTSA) suggests helmet laws increase usage (from ~40% to ~50%) when combined with enforcement and education.
    • Options proposed: maintain status quo; require helmets for all ages on all bicycles; require helmets for riders under 18 on all bicycles (similar to Tempe and Pima County); require helmets for riders under 18 on e-bikes only. Additional possibilities: speed limits on multi-use paths, retailer education requirements (like Scottsdale’s ordinance, passed in July).
    • Councilmember Koprowski expressed support for requiring helmets for minors on e-bikes, noting speed concerns especially for class three e-bikes (up to 28 mph). She also suggested partnering with schools for bike safety education.
    • Councilmember Bon Giovanni emphasized personal responsibility but supported further discussion on helmets for both e-bikes and traditional bikes, and on retailer education.
    • Councilmember Bucklin asked about enforcement. Chief Angstead noted a phased approach: heavy education first, then citations (civil traffic fines), along with drone enforcement for high-speed or group takeovers.
    • Councilmember Torres noted that many bikes can exceed 40 mph, and asked about the role of driver behavior and vehicle-bike collisions. Chief Angstead attributed the shift to e-bike proliferation among juveniles.
  • Water Utility Rate and Infrastructure Presentation (Rebecca Hamill, Water Manager; with Lauren Kelly and Patrick):

    • Water rates fund operations, critical priorities (e.g., North Water Treatment Plant reconstruction, well drilling), and future repair/replacement. They do not fund new development (paid by system development fees) or unrelated town services.
    • The North Water Treatment Plant is 50% complete, will supply 70% of Gilbert’s water, serve 250,000 residents, and produce 60 million gallons per day.
    • Seven new wells are being drilled; four require treatment or blending due to water quality. Completion timeline: first well by Q1 2026, remaining by Q1 2027.
    • Rate history: eight years with no increase (2010–2017); then increases in 2018, 2022, 2023, 2024. A “cash bond gradual option” was adopted in February 2024 with three annual increases: 50% (April 2024), 25% (April 2025), and a planned 25% (April 2026). A rate consultant will determine if 25% is appropriate.
    • Water affordability: Gilbert’s household burden is 0.87% of monthly income for the 20th percentile (below Arizona average 1.42% and national average 1.44%). A utility bill assistance program offers $30/month discounts; 408 clients enrolled, over $32,000 issued.
    • Water consumption: 57% of residential customers use 0–8,000 gallons/month (23% of residential supply); 1% use >50,000 gallons/month (11% of residential supply). 50–70% of residential water use is outdoors.
    • Funding gap: A “what-if” scenario showed that 5% annual increases over 20 years would have yielded lower current bills and more total revenue than the actual path.
    • Councilmember Lyons noted average utility bills of $1,100–1,200 in some areas (due to large multifamily or high-use customers). Staff emphasized water efficiency checkups, leak detection, and the landscape water budget program.
    • Councilmember Bon Giovanni highlighted personal responsibility in reducing water use, citing his own experience fixing leaks.
    • Councilmember Torres pressed for proactive outreach to high water users and HOAs, and asked about potential changes to landscape code standards to reduce water demand. Lauren Kelly noted ongoing outreach and past code updates, but acknowledged most HOAs would face high costs to switch to reclaimed water.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes taken; the session was for discussion and direction.
  • Council directed staff to:
    • Continue evaluating helmet ordinance options for e-bikes and traditional bikes, with specific focus on minors (under 18) and on e-bikes.
    • Explore additional measures: speed limits on multi-use paths, retailer education requirements, and partnerships with schools for bike safety education.
    • Enhance proactive outreach to high water users and HOAs, promoting conservation programs and leak detection.
    • Report back at a future meeting with a more detailed ordinance proposal and water rate options (including the planned 25% increase for April 2026).

Meeting Transcript

Okay, I'd like to um call orders study session. Council Member Kenny Bucklin's Council Member Yan Koprowski. Council Member Monty Lyons. Council Member Jim Torres. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. I'm Mike Angstead with the police department. Just take us a second here to get the presentation up. Council, I know you've got a packed agenda today, so I'm if you don't mind, I'll just start talking through the slides that would normally be up on the presentation. So I'm here today to talk about bikes, help bike helm, bike safety, and potentially an ordinance having to do with bike helmets. There we go. Kind of an overview, as many of you probably noticed as you drive around Gilbert, uh, if we were to go out on the roads today, you'd see the use of e-bikes is really surged in recent years. Uh they're popular alternative mode of transportation, and we're we have a concern or vested interest in these these bikes of all kinds. Um in terms of enforcing the laws and and regulations and making sure that people are safe as they operate on our roadways and sidewalks. Um I raised two high school, you know, teenage boys. Uh they're grown now, but there was a time where we wanted to get them out of the house and off of Xbox and you know go breathe fresh air and ride bikes. And uh that's happened, but a lot of them ride not only just regular bikes, but nowadays e-bikes. Um these e-bikes in Gilbert uh have become you know kind of a rising challenge for us in terms of safety, and uh we're committed to uh solving the issue with mayor and council. It's really not something we can solve overnight, and really the the town has taken a strategy over many decades to try and uh use a combination of engineering, uh education, trying to promote uh bicycle safety, the use of helmets, and then uh lastly enforcement, but any one of those components, um if we don't have all of them working in in conjunction together, uh we were relatively ineffective. So it's a multifaceted strategy. The agenda for tonight is to kind of talk about community feedback. We do a lot of surveys and gather a lot of data from the community in terms of what they were interested in regarding bike safety, and then uh second point we're gonna get into uh a series of slides that talk about bike safety efforts in Gilbert, not only uh from an engineering perspective, but also from an educational perspective. We'll get into crash and injury data, and then last there will be some ordinance options, and they're not exclusive. Really, it's it's if you all feel like an ordinance in any way is uh a good idea, then that's great. I try to stay in my lane being in the executive branch of government, and you being the legislative, um, I won't make a necessarily persuasive argument to you, rather than you know, rather I'll just leave it in your hands in terms of an option. So, first off, community feedback. Um, the number one takeaway from our 2022 transportation master plan when we asked the community what they wanted. Uh overall, it was improving safety for all users. Number two is reducing travel congestion on roads. I think we can all get behind number one and two. 70% of our population wanted more separation between bikes and cars. 67% were more likely to bike with uh more green bike lanes, which we're gonna get to later in this presentation. 51% wanted safer and easier crossings, and 48% wanted more connections to bikes and trails, and lastly, 45% of our folks wanted more bike lanes, trails, and paths. In terms of our current bike safety efforts, um, you know, I think we we listened to the public. Um not only did we do a lot of engineering uh changes and efforts that we're gonna get into, but one of the education uh efforts we did is this know your ride campaign, the police department launched uh this month, and some of it is just to educate parents on these different devices and the impact that they have in our community. Um as a parent, uh reading state law can be kind of cumbersome. But if I was to take all the different variations of e-bikes and bring them in here right now, we would all have a really hard time telling one device from the other, and I would have a hard time, and this is what I do for a living. The challenge is that when you look at this matrix, it talks about a bicycle, like an old Schwin or Huffy. And then next to it, it talks about an e-bike class one, class two, and class three. All of these are born as bicycles. If there's if the battery isn't charged on them, you can ride them, you can pedal them like a normal bike. The difference being if a parent was to ask me, well, what's the difference between all of them? The class one bike is a bike that you can sit on, and when you hit the throttle for the electrical part, uh it won't do anything unless you start to pedal. And then it kicks in and it assists the rider going down the roadway. Uh you can go up to 20 miles per hour on that device. A class two e-bike is different. When you sit on it and you hit the throttle, it takes off, uh, kind of like a scooter, maybe like a bird scooter kind of thing. You don't have to pedal. You can sit there and just keep the pedals level and just use the motor the entire time. It also goes 20 miles per hour max, and then it shuts off. Class three e-bike is very similar to the class one in that you have to pedal the pedals to make it go, and then the motor kicks in and it can't it'll go up to 28 miles an hour.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com