STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Grand Junction City Council met in regular session on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, at 5:31 p.m. in the City Hall Auditorium at 250 North 5th Street, and adjourned at 8:06 p.m. Council President Cody Kennedy presided; Councilmembers Robert Ballard, Scott Beilfuss, Laurel Lutz, Jason Nguyen, Anna Stout, and Ben Van Dyke were present. City Manager Mike Bennett, Interim City Attorney Jeremiah Boies, Police Chief Matt Smith, planning staff, and City Clerk Selestina Sandoval were also present. The Council voted unanimously to appoint Jennifer Landini to the Grand Junction Housing Authority Board for a partial term expiring October 31, 2028.
Two proposed code amendments, pulled from the consent agenda, were tabled indefinitely by unanimous voice vote (motion by Van Dyke, second by Lutz). The City Manager explained that staff and the Housing Affordability Committee Task Force (HACTF) had established a new review process, and these items needed to go back through that process before public hearing dates were set. Staff had prepared alternatives to the HACTF recommendations for bicycle parking and pedestrian access; the staff alternative included a corrected long-term bicycle parking ratio of .08 spaces per unit. Council took no action on the merits.
Principal Planner Tim Lehrbach presented a package of staff-initiated code corrections and clarifications covering planned development references, mixed-use downtown district standards, short-term rental parking, accessory uses and structures, shared driveways, access to public streets, multi-unit design standards, and 24 Road Corridor service/storage screening. The Planning Commission recommended approval 4-1 on January 13, 2026, with a storm drainage/retention pond item remanded and excluded. The public hearing opened and closed at 6:02 p.m. with no public comments. Council approved the ordinance 7-0 on final passage.
Council heard from Interim City Attorney Jeremiah Boies and Police Chief Matt Smith. The ordinance extended for one additional year the prohibition on new or relocated gaming arcades or gaming uses, originally adopted as Ordinance 5125. Staff cited ongoing litigation and a need for judicial decisions to mature before the city adopts a permanent response. Public commenter Noreen Alexander supported the extension, describing negative impacts from gaming businesses near her former business. The public hearing closed at 6:10 p.m. Council approved the ordinance 7-0.
Planning Manager Thomas Lloyd presented the request by Sunshine of Delta, Inc. to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for 3.72 vacant acres at 377 and 379 29 Road from Residential High to Mixed Use. Staff found the request consistent with the corridor and neighborhood-center planning framework; applicant representative Sparky Moyer said the area has transit access, a riverfront bike path, and nearby commercial development. The public hearing opened and closed at 6:22 p.m. with no comments. Councilmember Stout stated on the record that she found the criteria met. Council approved the ordinance 7-0.
Council considered the accompanying rezone of the same 3.72 acres from Residential Medium 12 (RM-12) to Mixed-Use Light Commercial (MU-2). Staff found the rezone consistent with the newly approved Mixed Use designation, the tiered-growth and intensification plan, and existing MU-2 development nearby. The public hearing opened and closed at 6:34 p.m. with no public comments. Council approved the ordinance 7-0. Council then took a recess from 6:35 to 6:45 p.m.
Principal Planner Tim Lehrbach presented a request to zone the recently annexed 2.56-acre Morelli property, located between 3105 E 1/2 Road and 3112 I-70B (Parcel 2943-103-00-101), as Mixed-Use Light Commercial (MU-2). The property is vacant, and the requested zoning implements the Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation. The public hearing opened and closed at 6:51 p.m. with no public comments. Council approved the ordinance 7-0.
Principal Planner Daniella Acosta Stine presented a request to authorize inclusion of approximately 15 acres of adjacent city-owned open space within the Camelback Gardens Planned Development and Outline Development Plan boundary. The PD proposes 90 dwelling units on 10.29 acres of private land; including the open space yields an overall density of about 3.6 dwelling units per acre, within the Residential Low range. Without inclusion, the density would be 8.75 units per acre and the applicant would need to reduce the unit count by 34 units, from 90 to 56. The resolution does not transfer ownership, alter open-space use, reduce public access, or change maintenance responsibilities. The city property committee supported the request on January 29, 2026. A neighbor, Chris Mackaney, attempted to comment but was deferred to non-scheduled comments because this was not a public hearing. Councilmember Stout confirmed the open space would not be developed. Council adopted the resolution 7-0 by voice vote.
A resolution to excuse Councilmember Ballard from certain absences and authorize remote participation during his Army National Guard deployment (departure April 2, 2026, for approximately one year) was considered. Councilmember Ballard recused himself and left the auditorium at 7:13 p.m. City Manager Bennett and Interim City Attorney Boies presented the proposal and answered questions. Councilmembers expressed differing views: Council President Kennedy strongly supported it as protection against potential misuse of home-rule procedures; Councilmember Van Dyke supported Ballard and said opposition was politically motivated; Councilmember Lutz supported protecting deployed service members but moved to postpone; Councilmember Stout opposed the resolution as unnecessary and objected that the matter had not first been discussed in a workshop with Ballard present; Councilmember Nguyen questioned the need given the charter's five-consecutive-meeting vacancy threshold; Councilmember Beilfuss raised the possibility of interim representation for the district. The Council voted 6-0 to postpone the resolution indefinitely and discuss the topic further at a future workshop.
Well I just don't want to show myself. I think it I think that makes the most sense for I don't want to go. Okay. Okay. And like indefinitely, just so that we're not time constrained on that. Right. Well, I guess that will work best for you for your patience. It is Wednesday, February fourth, twenty twenty-six. It is five thirty-one. And we will call the Grand Junction City Council meeting to order. And if you'll rise with me and we'll um say the Pledge of Allegiance and have a follow-by moment of silence. And we have an appointment to the Grand Junction Housing Authority Board. I move to appoint Jennifer Landini to the Grand Junction Housing to the Grand Junction Housing Authority Board for a partial term expiring October 31st, 2028. Second. We have a motion on the floor by Councilmember Van Dyke, second by uh Councilmember Stout. All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Seeing none. Motion passes seven to zero. All right. At this time, we're going to move into public comments. Uh individuals may make uh may comment on specific topics. Any specific topics except those listed in the regular agenda under the public hearing section. Speakers will have three minutes to make comments. When 30 seconds remain, you will see the yellow light and hear a beep. Once your time is up, you will see a red light and hear continuous beeps. And we do have some uh speakers that requested opportunities to address counsel. And the first one we have is Noreen. And it's after NORINE, we'll have uh Mari and then uh Mr. Dave Lord. Thank you. My name is uh Naureen Warez Alexander of uh community member of Grand Junction, Colorado. Um my concern is uh uh Councilman uh Ballard's um going on deployment. Um, I'm concerned for his health and safety. I want him to be safe while he is overseas, but I do not think that he could adequately represent his constituents and be gone for a full year. That I think there's a lot that happens in a year, though it seems micromillimeter by second by second. Um so I'm not sure that this is a good idea to have him just um participate from a long distance. It's kind of cool that we can do something like that, but I do believe that um in cases when people have lived in two blocks over from their regular uh community, uh they've been asked to step down or move back into the area. He is definitely going to be gone as he stated last year uh for a full year, and that's a long time to not be um right within the community. So I I am voicing a concern about that, not um uh