STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Grand Junction City Council held its regular meeting on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, at 5:30 PM in the City Hall Auditorium. The meeting opened with a Pledge of Allegiance and Moment of Silence, followed by a presentation from the Regional Transportation Planning Office (RTPO), public comments, liaison reports, and a consent agenda. The primary focus was on a resolution authorizing a 25-year ground lease and operating agreement with Colorado Mesa University (CMU) for the Lincoln Park Stadium Complex and Ralph Stocker Stadium, which passed 5-1 after extensive public testimony. Other actions included approval of a $5 million water enterprise loan, two zoning code amendments, and postponement of the Camelback Gardens public hearing.
City Manager Mike Bennett detailed the 25-year ground lease (the maximum allowed), under which CMU will construct a $7 million football facility on leased land between the stadium and the Lincoln Park Barn, entirely at CMU’s expense. CMU will also lease the Lincoln Park Barn, making modest internal improvements (HVAC, floor reinforcement) while preserving the historic character and facade. CMU will not take possession of the barn until the new Community Recreation Center opens (expected late 2026). Current annual payments continue ($36,705) plus a new $300,000 annual lease operation fee, offsetting the city’s current net operating cost of $301,172 per year. CMU will cover 80% of field maintenance and 50% of turf replacement costs (estimated $800,000–$1 million every 8 years). All historic uses of the stadium (including District 51 track meets, band competitions, graduations, youth football, Special Olympics) are preserved, and daytime public access to the track will continue. Naming rights require city approval. Concessions will be jointly managed; the city retains baseball-side revenue. The agreement includes default protections and a dispute resolution process. CMU President John Marshall highlighted the university’s 100-year relationship with the city, the need to consolidate football operations currently spread across campus, and a fundraising window in the centennial year. He noted that CMU has experience preserving historic structures (Houston Hall, Robinson Theater). Council discussion reflected strong divisions. Councilmember Beilfuss moved to table the resolution for 30 days to allow further public engagement on the barn, arguing the community was not adequately heard. The motion failed for lack of a second. Councilmember Stout and others supported the agreement, citing financial benefits, preservation of the barn, and partnership enhancement. Council President Kennedy argued that the “park takeover” narrative was false and that the community includes CMU. The resolution passed 5-1, with Councilmember Beilfuss voting no.
Utilities Director Randi Kim presented. The city needs $4.64 million for water line replacements (Linden Avenue, railroad crossing, CDOT-related, Aspen/Palisade/Glenwood streets) and a tank lining project. The Water Fund lacks reserves, so staff recommended a $5 million privately placed commercial bank loan (10-20 year term, indicative 4.15% interest) over a state revolving fund loan due to restrictions (Davis-Bacon, Buy America) and ineligibility of one project. The loan will be repaid through water rates, which are increased incrementally and remain affordable. The public hearing had no comments. The ordinance passed unanimously (6-0).
Planning Manager Thomas Lloyd presented. The Housing Affordability Task Force recommended changes to reduce development costs and increase flexibility. The amendment narrows pedestrian access requirements to non-industrial zoned development (excluding single-unit detached and duplex dwellings), reduces the minimum width to 4 feet, removes prescriptive design standards, and clarifies crossing visibility standards. Staff developed an alternative that simplified language while preserving intent, which the Task Force supported. The Planning Commission recommended approval 5-0. No public comments. The ordinance passed unanimously (6-0).
Principal Planner Tim Lehrbach presented. The amendments update procedures for determining fair market value when right-of-way is dedicated beyond what is required, adopt nursery-standard water-use categories for plants (and require 90% low-water plants), and limit street frontage landscape requirements for new subdivisions to collector and arterial streets (removing them for local streets where they create conflicts). Staff found consistency with the comprehensive plan. The Planning Commission recommended approval 7-0. No public comments. The ordinance passed unanimously (6-0).
I appreciate everybody quieting as we approach. I mean I know that some of your clocks are saying we're a minute over, but I kinda go by this clock at the back of the room. But before I before I do call us to order, I just I do very much appreciate um decorum. And I can see that you'll you'll all will be very polite and treat each other respectfully tonight, but that's very important throughout this process uh throughout the evening. So we'll talk about that before public comment, but uh that's very important to us on council that we treat each other well here. So um and of course you all will, no matter what side of a conversation you're on. I just thought I'd put that out there for you. So with that, it is 5:30 p.m. on March 4th, and I will call the Grand Junction City Council meeting to order. Please rise for the pledge, and we'll be we'll follow that with a moment of silence. I pledge allegiance to the flag. Please be seated. Okay, I I need to make one quick announcement. Um, and this is regarding the camelback gardens development that was on the content consent agenda for this evening. There's um this is for rescheduling, and if it's adopted, um it will not be held tonight. So um just if you're here for camel back gardens, I just wanted to make sure that that that was on your radar. Okay, and with that, we'll move into our presentations and our initial um presentation is from the RTPO, which is the Regional Transportation Planning Office. We have an update. Um this is the um Mesa County Regional Transportation Planning Office. Uh it's one of the city's partners in oversight and operation of the read of the region's transportation network in operation of Grand Valley Transit. Our TPO director, Dana uh Roslik, is here this evening and will provide an annual community update on the regional transportation planning office as well as the Mesa County Safety Action Plan. Thank you. Thank you for having us tonight. I'm Dana Brosig, the Regional Transportation Planning Office Director, and I'm joined with Rachel Peterson, our senior transportation planner. Um so I just want to give a very brief background on what we do as the Regional Transportation Planning Office or RTPO. Um we are an umbrella organization. We see ourselves as regional government, so we represent all of the jurisdictions in Mesa County, including the city of Grand Junction. Um we we work on all different modes of transportation, including those who drive, walk, bike, and freight. Um, and so that's kind of the purview that we work with in. Uh we are an umbrella organization because we are technically the Grand Valley Transportation Planning Region, which is transportation planning for the more rural area, the Transportation Metropolitan Planning Organization, which is the more urban area, which you can see on the map in orange, and then we also um oversee Grand Valley Transit, our local transit system. Um we do have a board of directors, which is the Grand Valley Regional Transportation Committee, and we have Commissioner Wynne or Councilman Wynn on our uh representing the city on our GBRTC. Uh we also have a number of advisory committees. Um we have a transportation advisory committee that meets about once a month, and this is where staff, engineering and planning staff from all four jurisdictions as well as CDOT meet to talk about different transportation ish issues to make sure we're collaborating in our transportation world. Um as you know, roads don't stop at jurisdiction boundaries, and so it's important to work together and really have a cohesive system that we're all talking about. Uh we also have a mobile Mesa County Alliance, and this group meets um less frequently, but the intent is to make sure that nonprofits and other government organizations are working together to improve transportation for vulnerable populations. Um and so this is important to identify gaps in transportation for different populations and also to make sure that we're not duplicating services. And then lastly, we have the transportation safety task force, which we'll be talking a little bit more about, but is a multi plus multidisciplinary group that's working towards creating safer roads um in our community. Uh we're gonna be talking about two annual reports today. Uh the first is just about the RTPO, and then the second one is more focused on the safety task force. Um on the RTPO uh side, some of the major highlights is we did celebrate Grand Valley Transit's 25th anniversary. So we started in 2000. Um we also completed a new um fleet maintenance facility, which you can see a picture of. Um it's down at the city fleet yard. And then we also adopted our Grand Valley 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, which we are federally required to do every five years. Um I like this slide because it kind of gives a snapshot of transportation across our community. Uh, you can see we had over 580,000 Grand Valley of Transit boardings in 2025. We added a pilot route, Route 12, which connects West Transfer Vacility to North Avenue.