OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Grand Junction, Colorado/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Grand Junction City Council Workshop on Parks Fees, Ballard's Deployment, and Decorum (March 30, 2026)

City Council — Monday, March 30, 2026
BodyGrand Junction, Colorado
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, March 30, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

2:18

Yeah, it's nice.

3:38

It

Speaker 2

3:38

is five three months

Unassigned speaker

3:42

on the March thirtieth, and I will call the junction city

Speaker 3

3:46

council workshop to work.

3:49

And as we uh start out this evening, we'll be able to discuss topics, the uh fee update and discussion at all the sort of like or production.

Unassigned speaker

4:04

All right, thank you,

Speaker 3

4:05

Mayor

Speaker 4

4:06

members of council.

4:07

Uh, tonight just discussion, if you recall at a previous workshop, but it's been it's been a few months back now.

4:15

We have three alternative options related

Unassigned speaker

4:20

to an

Speaker 4

4:20

update

Unassigned speaker

4:21

and marks on the we received direction at the council workshop to move forward with what was option to be at the time, and bring that through the normal process for adoption and consider her consideration for adoption for a council meeting.

Speaker 4

5:02

And with those questions and

Unassigned speaker

5:06

that

Speaker 4

5:06

communication, we dove deeper and we uh and some of them

Unassigned speaker

5:11

are related to the fact

Speaker 4

5:12

that we had a quite a few data sets and questioning if some of those transactions had various nuances to them.

5:23

Same company to or to a familiar company or

Unassigned speaker

5:27

something like that.

Unassigned speaker

5:28

Values that maybe

Speaker 4

5:29

didn't reflect a

Unassigned speaker

5:30

normal

Speaker 4

5:30

transaction because of other

Unassigned speaker

5:32

components to the transaction.

Unassigned speaker

5:35

So we

Speaker 4

5:36

engaged with

Unassigned speaker

5:37

an

Speaker 4

5:37

appraiser to go back through all that data.

Unassigned speaker

5:40

And

Speaker 4

5:41

this is why we didn't come back through with council.

5:43

We wanted to dive deeper, kind of considering

Unassigned speaker

5:46

all those components and working with an appraiser who went back and opened to everything with every transaction in our data set.

Unassigned speaker

5:55

That led us to two new options that we

Speaker 4

5:58

wanted to bring

Unassigned speaker

6:00

for

Speaker 4

6:00

council tonight, because it's different from where we left off after that last workshop before we move through the public consideration process.

Unassigned speaker

6:11

So

Speaker 4

6:12

Tamara Allen

Unassigned speaker

6:13

or community development

Speaker 4

6:15

directors

Unassigned speaker

6:15

can

Speaker 4

6:16

walk through some slides here, just as a refresher of where we left off

Unassigned speaker

6:20

and

Speaker 4

6:20

what the new information brought before us and what those options are.

6:25

And then there's a secondary component after we get through that, where we're talking more about the text component that comes along with this.

6:34

And so we have a few slides on that once we finish the discussion on

Speaker 5

6:38

the calculation.

Unassigned speaker

6:40

Thank

Speaker 5

6:40

you.

6:42

Excellent.

6:42

Well, Mike did a great job giving the high level aspects of what we're bringing back to you.

6:47

So let me go through a couple of slides here, and then I have my hand out.

6:50

I'd also like to give you guys a little bit of time to look at and process.

6:56

So just by way of recollection, which um Mike definitely leaned into here, um, we came to you in December of 2025 to talk about kind of a variety of options with regard to the fee study.

7:09

Um the initial fee study data provided uh per acre land value of approximately 147,000 dollars.

7:17

Um, and again, based on some of the requests from the HBA and the representatives there and look at three different options.

7:24

Again, we presented these at that point in time, ranging from 108 to 116,000, depending on how you uh slice and kind of uh uh change that data within the existing data set.

7:38

Um, the direction as Mike again touched on was to look at the option three, which removed the variety of kind of the highest and the lowest uh transaction values, and that landed at 180,000.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural████████████████████████████████32%
Community Engagement███████████████████████████████31%
Real Estate Committee████████████12%
Fee Schedule████████8%
Public Engagement██████6%
Affordable Housing████4%
Pending Litigation███3%
Parks and Recreation██2%
Downtown Development█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Grand Junction City Council Workshop on Parks Fees, Ballard's Deployment, and Decorum (March 30, 2026)

The Grand Junction City Council held a workshop on March 30, 2026, at the Fire Department Training Room to discuss the Parks Impact Fee calculation, the military deployment of Councilmember Robert Ballard, and Councilmember communication and decorum. No formal votes were taken, but consensus was reached on the parks fee and direction was given to bring a resolution forward for Ballard's deployment. No formal public comment period was held.

Parks Impact Fee Update and Discussion

  • Staff presented two new options for calculating park land acquisition costs based on a new MAI appraisal review: Option 3A (refined sales data at ~$113,000/acre) and Option 3B (appraised values at ~$90,000/acre).
  • Councilmember Anna Stout stated that choosing Option 3B is a "conscious policy decision" and a trade-off that prioritizes short-term housing affordability over long-term park funding, effectively "borrowing from the future."
  • Councilmember Scott Beilfuss expressed support for moving forward, noting the reduction is "nominal" but contributes to addressing housing affordability, describing it as a "death by a thousand cuts."
  • Councilmember Jason Nguyen stated the lower fee sends a message that the city is partnering with the community on housing affordability.
  • Councilmember Ben Van Dyke, Councilmember Laurel Lutz, Councilmember Robert Ballard, and Mayor Cody Kennedy expressed consensus.
  • Direction: Council reached a consensus to move forward with process direction on Option 3B (~$90,000/acre) and proposed code text amendments regarding periodic fee study reviews, refunds of fee differences, and offsets for previously paid in-lieu fees.

Councilmember Ballard's Deployment

  • Councilmember Ballard stated he can attend meetings remotely despite a nine-hour time difference, noting his IT is "hardened" and he can call in if needed.
  • Councilmember Stout argued a resolution is unnecessary, stating the remote meeting policy already covers participation, and urged a focus on constituent access rather than a bureaucratic process. She suggested a public statement of support instead.
  • Councilmember Van Dyke, Councilmember Beilfuss, and Mayor Kennedy argued the resolution is needed to provide absolute legal clarity and prevent challenges. Kennedy noted the "gray area" in the charter regarding the definition of a meeting.
  • Councilmember Nguyen expressed openness but raised concerns about pre-excusing five consecutive meetings, preferring to wait until closer to the threshold.
  • Councilmember Lutz sees the resolution as moot and urged a different approach.
  • Interim City Attorney Jeremiah Boies confirmed that passing the resolution would protect the city from legal ambiguity regarding the five-consecutive-meeting threshold for a vacancy.
  • Direction: Informal direction to bring a resolution excusing Councilmember Ballard's absences during military deployment forward for a vote at a regular meeting.

Councilmember Communication and Decorum

  • Councilmember Stout initiated the discussion, citing a pattern of "inflammatory and misleading language" by Councilmember Beilfuss toward staff (e.g., calling them "dickheads"), community partners (calling the CMU president "jumpy"), and other councilmembers, as well as misstatements of fact regarding GJ Auto Sales and CMU.
  • Councilmember Beilfuss acknowledged he can "do better" and expressed a desire for better working relationships. He admitted he has been trying to advance issues "with a hammer instead of a glove."
  • Councilmember Lutz emphasized the importance of distinguishing policy disagreement from personal attacks and misinformation.
  • Councilmember Van Dyke stressed the responsibility of council members to be truthful, stating "we owe the public the facts."
  • Councilmember Nguyen urged caution to avoid a "chilling effect" on deliberation.
  • Councilmember Stout stated the conversation did not fully resolve the issue, as she did not hear an apology to CMU or the Martinez family.
  • Outcome: No immediate censure was passed. Council members expressed a shared expectation of improved conduct and professionalism moving forward.

City Council Communication

  • Council members discussed the upcoming Mayor/Mayor Pro Tem rotation, board and commission assignments, and CML (Colorado Municipal League) conference registration.

Next Workshop Topics (April 13, 2026)

  • Planned items include the 7th & 9th Street conceptual study, public land use in development calculations, a potential 29 Road workshop, the mayoral rotation, and a tour of the community recreation center.

Other Business

  • Urban Trails Committee: Councilmembers Beilfuss and Lutz updated the Council on their selections to fill five vacancies from a pool of seven applicants.
  • Downtown Development Authority (DDA): Councilmembers Stout and Nguyen updated the Council on their selections for DDA vacancies.
  • Zoning Board of Appeals: Staff recommended shifting to role-based appointments tied to Planning Commission positions (chair, first alternate, second alternate) for continuity and efficiency.
  • Teacher Appreciation Week Proclamation: Council expressed general support for issuing the proclamation as a standard civic proclamation moving forward.

Meeting Transcript

Yeah, it's nice. It is five three months on the March thirtieth, and I will call the junction city council workshop to work. And as we uh start out this evening, we'll be able to discuss topics, the uh fee update and discussion at all the sort of like or production. All right, thank you, Mayor members of council. Uh, tonight just discussion, if you recall at a previous workshop, but it's been it's been a few months back now. We have three alternative options related to an update and marks on the we received direction at the council workshop to move forward with what was option to be at the time, and bring that through the normal process for adoption and consider her consideration for adoption for a council meeting. And with those questions and that communication, we dove deeper and we uh and some of them are related to the fact that we had a quite a few data sets and questioning if some of those transactions had various nuances to them. Same company to or to a familiar company or something like that. Values that maybe didn't reflect a normal transaction because of other components to the transaction. So we engaged with an appraiser to go back through all that data. And this is why we didn't come back through with council. We wanted to dive deeper, kind of considering all those components and working with an appraiser who went back and opened to everything with every transaction in our data set. That led us to two new options that we wanted to bring for council tonight, because it's different from where we left off after that last workshop before we move through the public consideration process. So Tamara Allen or community development directors can walk through some slides here, just as a refresher of where we left off and what the new information brought before us and what those options are. And then there's a secondary component after we get through that, where we're talking more about the text component that comes along with this. And so we have a few slides on that once we finish the discussion on the calculation. Thank

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com