OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Grand Junction, Colorado/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Grand Junction City Council Workshop - June 15, 2026

City Council — Monday, June 15, 2026
BodyGrand Junction, Colorado
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, June 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:58:38

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

1:05

If

Unassigned speaker

1:05

you

Speaker 1

1:05

see me wave and I'll send you a message.

Speaker 2

1:13

Okay, it is 5:30 on Monday, June 15th.

1:16

We will call the Grand Junction City Council workshops over here.

1:22

And we are starting off with uh discussion topics first is Grand Valley River Corridor presentation.

1:30

And uh nice wanna talk.

Speaker 3

1:32

Sure, thank you, maybe your members of council.

1:34

I'm actually then uh have our transportation and engineering director, Trump Crawl in charge.

1:41

Thanks, Trent.

Speaker 4

1:44

Good evening.

1:44

Um the engineering transportation director here with the city of Grand Junction.

1:50

And um, this evening we've got um some representatives of the Grand Valley River Corridor Initiative, Joel Schultz, um, who's also part of the one riverfront um over yes, that's correct.

2:04

And then we

Unassigned speaker

2:06

also have Hannah Home, um, who is with um

Speaker 4

2:09

American Rivers

Unassigned speaker

2:10

and

Speaker 4

2:10

formally

Unassigned speaker

2:11

um was

Speaker 4

2:12

also with CMR

Unassigned speaker

2:14

and um

Speaker 4

2:15

anyway.

2:16

Um this evening we've got on

Unassigned speaker

2:19

uh

Speaker 4

2:19

one of the projects that they've been working on um that

Unassigned speaker

2:22

we've been supported.

Unassigned speaker

2:23

We've uh I think about three six thousand dollars as part of our map of all of the county and other um municipalities here from Valley as well for participating in the master funding value for the work um anyway.

Unassigned speaker

2:41

So this evening we've got a short presentation, about 15 minutes and some

Speaker 4

2:46

time for questions after that as well as one of that.

2:50

Um that

Unassigned speaker

2:54

thanks

Speaker 5

2:55

so much, Trent, and thanks for your time to member.

2:58

And anyone talking about that.

3:02

Maybe if we get some hard ending questions.

3:07

So we last presented to council here at Grand Junction in 24.

3:12

Um, that was after we had done some workshops with the three jurisdictions here in Grand Valley on what a vision for the river in the next 30 years could look like.

3:22

What would we want to do about that?

3:24

And that ended in a letter of support from the city uh to pursue a master plan that uh would bring all these values and concepts and and ultimately come up with that vision of that roadmap.

3:36

So we're in that process right now.

3:39

Um so tonight right now is really an update to you all as we're in this and uh to get any questions and feedback you might have.

3:47

Um we are not seeing an adoption or decision on new regulations, anything like that.

3:53

We just want to update you on the direction that this has taken.

3:57

Um get any thoughts.

4:01

So uh we can go to the next slide, please.

4:06

I have a clicker fantastic.

4:10

So we're gonna reintroduce um Grand Valley Corps initiative and the master plan, talk about where we're on

Unassigned speaker

4:17

the process.

Unassigned speaker

4:17

Um

Speaker 5

4:18

about some of the things that we've heard from our

Unassigned speaker

4:21

uh

Speaker 5

4:21

public engagement thus far, and we're gonna be going back out for public engagements later in the

Unassigned speaker

4:26

summer.

Speaker 5

4:28

Very briefly in 24, we worked with a lot of the staff uh from Fruit and Grand Junction House in Mason County.

4:37

So Kim was there, um some of your planning staff were there, uh which is the fruit actually.

4:44

So it's great because you're here to still be ordered this way.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

And some of the visions and kind of concepts that came out of that was if we want to have a river quarter that is supporting all the values that we have of it, an amenity to the public, a recreational destination, habitat, sensitive hazardous areas as well in the floodplain, then we need to have kind of more of a consistent vision and planning for that across the jurisdictions.

Speaker 5

5:24

So we've developed a vision statement as part of that as well, and it's to use data to a data-driven approach to create a steward, resilient, vibrant, healthy river that supports a lot of things, right?

5:38

The river supports so many things in our community.

5:41

So that benefits both today and the next generation.

5:45

So that 30-year vision of what we want the river to be and not just have kind of developments and infrastructure having kind of ad hoc jurisdiction by jurisdiction.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Active Transportation██████████████████18%
Downtown Development█████████████████17%
Affordable Housing████████████████16%
Parks and Recreation█████████9%
Procedural████████8%
Transportation Safety████████8%
Public Engagement█████5%
Engineering And Infrastructure████4%
Public Safety████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Grand Junction City Council Workshop - June 15, 2026

The Grand Junction City Council held a workshop on June 15, 2026, from 5:30 p.m. to 8:27 p.m. at the Fire Department Training Room. Discussion topics included the Grand Valley River Corridor Initiative, redevelopment policy, and a multimodal corridor concept. Council also addressed council communications, future workshop topics, and other business.

Grand Valley River Corridor Initiative Presentation & Update

Joel Schultz and Hannah Home presented on behalf of the multi-jurisdictional Grand Valley River Corridor Initiative (GVRCI), which is developing a River Corridor Master Plan covering approximately 54 miles from Whitewater to Lower Boat Ramp. The plan aims to create a data-driven, 30-year vision for the river corridor, focusing on stewardship, recreation, habitat, and connectivity. Council expressed broad support for the effort. Key discussion points included preserving riparian areas, balancing recreation with habitat protection, restoration opportunities at gravel pits, and concerns about private property rights and the plan potentially becoming regulatory. Council generally supported receiving the completed plan for future consideration, with a preference for incorporating it into existing planning documents as a guidance document rather than a regulatory framework. Staff confirmed that city departments have been actively involved throughout the process.

Redevelopment Policy Discussion

Community Development Director Tamra Allen presented the Redevelopment Area Incentive Policy, in place since 2004 but technically expired in 2022. The policy provides a 50% reduction in transportation capacity fees for redevelopment projects within designated areas, with additional reductions for qualifying vertical development in core areas. Staff requested council direction on whether to renew the policy. Council generally supported continuing the program. Discussion included the value of infill development, supporting housing, and the relationship between incentives and affordability. Council expressed support for clarifying that attached residential projects (such as townhomes) meeting a minimum density of 16 units per acre would be eligible for the additional vertical development incentive. Council indicated a preference for maintaining existing redevelopment boundaries. According to staff, the city has invested approximately $2.5 million in incentives through this program for recent projects. Council directed staff to prepare a resolution to continue the policy with the discussed clarifications.

7th Street/9th Street Multi-Modal Concept

Engineering and Transportation Director Trent Prall presented revised concepts for improving multimodal connectivity between Colorado Mesa University, Downtown, and Riverside Parkway. The original concept included lane reductions on 7th Street, which drew concerns from emergency responders, CMU, and others. The revised concept shifts emphasis to a multimodal corridor along 9th Street, maintaining existing lane configurations on 7th Street. Key elements include coordinating with CMU’s plan to relocate the North Avenue traffic signal from 10th Street to 9th Street, creating a safer north-south multimodal connection through campus, and improving connectivity to Emerson Park, Las Colonias, and Riverside Parkway. Council discussion included concerns from some members about neighborhood impacts and increased traffic on 9th Street, while others strongly supported the proposal for safety and connectivity benefits. Staff clarified that Washington Park would act as a barrier to vehicle through traffic, making 9th Street primarily a bicycle and pedestrian connection. Council generally supported continued refinement of the concept and requested additional outreach, particularly with businesses and property owners in the southern portion of the corridor.

City Council Communication

Councilmembers discussed potential future regulation of electric motorcycles, inspired by recent actions in Douglas County. Council agreed to consider scheduling a workshop on the topic, following the police chief’s recommendation to first pursue education and enforcement efforts.

Next Workshop Topics

City Manager Mike Bennett summarized upcoming workshop topics:

  • Norms of Conduct (initially set for August 3rd but may be rescheduled due to councilmember availability)
  • Houseless Providers update (August 17th)
  • Housing Action Plan discussion (July 13th) The June 29th workshop topic remains to be confirmed.

Other Business

  • Downtown Development Authority Appointment: Council acknowledged the resignation of Aith Rodriguez from the DDA and noted that Stephen Boyd, previously selected as an alternate, will fill the vacancy.
  • Ito City, Japan Cultural Exchange: Council discussed a request for letters of support for a cultural exchange effort with Ito City, Japan. After debate about whether to submit one letter from the mayor or two separate letters, the mayor agreed to consult with organizers to determine the preferred approach.

The workshop adjourned at 8:27 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

If you see me wave and I'll send you a message. Okay, it is 5:30 on Monday, June 15th. We will call the Grand Junction City Council workshops over here. And we are starting off with uh discussion topics first is Grand Valley River Corridor presentation. And uh nice wanna talk. Sure, thank you, maybe your members of council. I'm actually then uh have our transportation and engineering director, Trump Crawl in charge. Thanks, Trent. Good evening. Um the engineering transportation director here with the city of Grand Junction. And um, this evening we've got um some representatives of the Grand Valley River Corridor Initiative, Joel Schultz, um, who's also part of the one riverfront um over yes, that's correct. And then we also have Hannah Home, um, who is with um American Rivers and formally um was also with CMR and um anyway. Um this evening we've got on uh one of the projects that they've been working on um that we've been supported. We've uh I think about three six thousand dollars as part of our map of all of the county and other um municipalities here from Valley as well for participating in the master funding value for the work um anyway. So this evening we've got a short presentation, about 15 minutes and some time for questions after that as well as one of that. Um that thanks so much, Trent, and thanks for your time to member. And anyone talking about that. Maybe if we get some hard ending questions. So we last presented to council here at Grand Junction in 24. Um, that was after we had done some workshops with the three jurisdictions here in Grand Valley on what a vision for the river in the next 30 years could look like. What would we want to do about that? And that ended in a letter of support from the city uh to pursue a master plan that uh would bring all these values and concepts and and ultimately come up with that vision of that roadmap. So we're in that process right now. Um so tonight right now is really an update to you all as we're in this and uh to get any questions and feedback you might have. Um we are not seeing an adoption or decision on new regulations, anything like that. We just want to update you on the direction that this has taken. Um get any thoughts. So uh we can go to the next slide, please. I have a clicker fantastic. So we're gonna reintroduce um Grand Valley Corps initiative and the master plan, talk about where we're on the process. Um about some of the things that we've heard from our uh

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com