Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Grand Junction City Council held its regular meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, October 21, 2026, in the City Hall Auditorium at 250 North 5th Street. The mayor presided; Councilmember Stout attended virtually and Councilmember Ballard was absent. The six voting members present approved each item requiring a vote by 6-0, including a supplemental budget appropriation, a data center moratorium, a property rezone, and a wastewater treatment plant engineering contract amendment.
And I will order the Wednesday, October 232. Okay. Thank you everyone for being here tonight. We do have a little bit of a change in the schedule. So in before we do the proclamations and public comment, we are going to have our city manager report first. So I will turn it over to our city manager Mike Bennett. All right. Thank you, Mayor, members of council, and thank you for everybody who is here tonight. Typically I'm reporting uh to you all as uh, but I I want to I want to address uh the audience and especially those of you who are here related to the senior center. Um after a lot of feedback and uh over the last week and and over the weekend contemplating and responding to uh the feedback that I received, I've made the decision that in our recommended budget uh to the city council, which they will take up in November, made the decision that we will continue to offer the space at the current uh facility. Uh, as you know, we offer free space to a nonprofit uh that runs the senior center, and we will continue to offer that space so that the senior center can may continue to operate as it does uh moving forward in the terms of settings. I uh uh I I want to I want to talk a little bit about it and provide and share some things. Uh so with this decision, uh I had the opportunity to engage with many people and and we received a lot of very thoughtful uh civil and constructive feedback that provided lots of great examples to help us consider uh things that we needed to consider as we as we made this uh made this decision. I hope people understand that we have a leadership team uh that has inherited a structural deficit that began in 2021 as come and has come compounded to this point, and that's made it for some tough budget uh years coming into 2025 and 2026. And that's that's led to hundreds of decisions and recommendations that have that equate to multi-millions in reductions and multi-millions in investments and in core services that we provide. I also want to I want to own the fact that uh I I want to own that this was this was my decision uh in ultimately in bringing that recommendation at the time that we did in our in our workshops. This is not a parks and recreation effort. We have passionate, incredible people in our parks and recreation department who are not in the business of parks and recreation to end services, they're in the business to and uh create and expand services and Ken Sherbone does in a tremendous job and and Emily Krause in leading that department. And I appreciate their efforts. They faced a tough task as all of our departments have this year in addressing our structural deficit with proportional adjustments and reductions that we've had to make. If if you don't have the money, you can't spend the money, right? And and I think I think our public uh relies on us and expects us to make those tough decisions to make sure that we are our spending within our means and that we are focusing on our core services and delivering those services that have an impact and that we often take for granted because if they're working well, like water and sewer and streets and and uh parks and recreation and police and fire and those types of things, um, and they cost uh a lot of money and and and it's a it's a mutual uh benefit, it's a mutual partnership with the revenues that come in from taxes and the revenues that come in from businesses that go into these uh services uh that we provide. So I want to make it uh make it clear that that this was this came this was too abrupt, the communication was too abrupt and too quick, and uh and I own the fact that uh it caused a lot of uh consternation and concern. Uh and I apologize for that uh the those who were affected that way. I want to thank you, the people that shared that constructive and civil feedback from a standpoint of providing context and helpful. I also want to call out that the angry personal attacks and the non-civil and non-constructive feedback that was received from uh many as well, and hopefully not many of you in this room did not move the needle on this. Um it was not it did not go into uh our consideration. It was the thoughtful feedback that helped us see that while we are adding resources and new programs at the community recreation center, those are great additions, and they're for all ages, and we have over 2300 seniors who have signed up in different ways, and we see that growing, but they don't replicate what a senior center is able to offer. And that was great insight for us to think through. In making all these hundreds of decisions with multi-million dollars of effect. I know it's hard to understand when something is at a lower amount, um, but all of them add up together, and it and it's a challenge as we work through it. 70,000 people in this community don't agree on everything and never will. And uh, but it's our commitment as a city to listen. Uh, we often and I often share in engagements with community members and with our city council and our city council uh in their uh in their own strategic plan and focus on transparency and engagement. We commit that while we might not be able to deliver any everything and answer everything because there are limited resources, um, we are going to listen and we are focused on outcomes, and when we're not reaching those outcomes with the efforts that we are contemplating or doing, we're we commit to acknowledging that. And and and we're not all nobody's perfect, we're not gonna get it right 100% of the time. And that's what local government, the beauty of local government of having engagement and listening and engaging and and taking that into consideration so that we can make better decisions. Again, not every decision will be accepted by 100% of the the population at any given time. But as we weighed this one with that constructive civil feedback uh that we did receive, it helped us see that the benefits outweigh uh the benefits of continuing uh this partnership and this service definitely outweigh uh the the other outcomes that we were working on. If you were following along with our budget uh presentations, and you can watch those videos from August 31st and October 5th, and all the documents and all the presentations are on our website uh as well under the budget development tab. When we brought up this one, we said it wasn't as much of a budget reduction as it was an efficiency uh standpoint, but that efficiency standpoint overlooked some of the impact. And uh, and I just want to acknowledge that publicly and appreciate those of you who were who were civil and who shared insightful uh feedback to us to help us uh make that decision and wanted to share that uh with you tonight and speak to you here in the in the audience on that. Um again, I appreciate sorry, let me I recognize we could have handled it better, um, but I appreciate the feedback that helped us in the consideration. Uh and keep in mind that uh we're still in the process of of making recommended budget. That's a the as a CEO of the organization.