The Grand Rapids City Commission held a regular meeting on August 25, 2026, beginning in the evening. The meeting included public comments on agenda items, a budget ordinance amendment, public hearings on an industrial facilities exemption for City Built Brewing, and extensive public testimony opposing the city's use of Flock automatic license plate readers (ALPRs). Commissioners and the mayor committed to continued discussion and review of the Flock program but took no immediate action to alter it.
Well, I don't know how the entire room was watching the clock backwards. I don't think there's one behind me, but you all came to a nice respectful hush. Um, I'm gonna open this meeting of the city commission and uh ask you all to join us as is our pattern with a moment of silence. Please join us in the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for State under God. Thank you. Uh Mr. Clerk, if you could call the role. Commissioner Balchak. Present. Commissioner Asassi. President. Commissioner Knight. President Commissioner Kilgore here. Mayor LeGrand. Yes, uh, can I have a motion to excuse uh Commissioner Purdue, who's off at a training support. Uh all in favor say aye. Aye. Uh and if our interpreter could come back and explain her role. Leyendo or traduciendo lo que digan. Um good evening, my name is Sandra Nickel, and I'm here to help you understand and be understood. If you don't speak English, I will interpret from English to Spanish and vice versa. Thank you. Thank you. Uh this brings us next to uh our first opportunity for public comment. This is on agenda items. So if there's an item on the agenda that you'd wish to address the commission on, um please uh take a look glance at the rules up there and uh uh come up and address us. Thank you. Tell them on the other island. Good evening, Mayor, Commissioners, um, members of the public. My name is Ivan Diaz. I stay in the first ward on the Southwest side. I'd like to speak to item C1, the care violence contract. Um, I was watching your guys' meeting earlier today, and I was actually pretty heartened to see some of the conversation that was happening up around the dais, specifically around trying to reduce recidivism. Um a lot of that conversation having to do with the upcoming votes on increasing the millage. Sorry, I hold on one second you hold up. Can you please turn off the flashlight on your phone? It's right up my eye. Thank you. Go ahead. Uh no worries. Um, yeah, trying to to reduce recidivism alongside the conversation of the upcoming uh votes that our county is gonna have on increasing the county millage. Um specifically some of the comments that you were making, um, city manager around doing our best, or you all doing your best to make sure that we're not only with this initiative but with other initiatives, hopefully trying to make sure that frankly we don't have the need for increased space in the county jail or to send more people down that path. Um I'm gonna bring this up also in the other half of public comment, but I would love to have the city commission through your lobbyists advocating at a much stronger level at the federal and state level to have them do everything they can to actually invest in social services and housing and all of these things that you all already brought up that I'm not really gonna get into because again you did in my opinion a pretty good job discussing that earlier today. We all know that unfortunately that's not gonna happen at the federal level during the next two years. Um, but there's a very good chance that Democrats will take back the trifecta in uh Michigan this year. And given the fact that we have uh potentially up to seven people representing us in the legislature on the democratic side, I think that will really represent a true opportunity to have those investments coming from the state level. Alongside that conversation, and I know that some may be less willing to say so publicly than others. We're going to have to talk about increasing taxes on the wealthiest people in the state in order to fund these services. And so again, I would prefer to have I would love to see as uh a member of the city, as a resident of the city, to have you all actually through your lobbyists taking these positions, because I think that would be much more impactful and powerful than to have you all through your individual voices doing so.