OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Great Barrington, Massachusetts/Selectboard & Town Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Great Barrington Candidates Forum and Finance Committee Discussion – April 28, 2026

Selectboard & Town Boards — Tuesday, April 28, 2026
BodyGreat Barrington, Massachusetts
SessionSelectboard & Town Boards
DateTuesday, April 28, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:48:49

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

Good evening, everybody, and welcome.

0:02

Um welcome to the candidates forum for the town of Great Barrington.

0:07

It's so nice to have you here.

0:09

Um this is your chance, all of our chance to um meet the candidates for office in the town um of Great Barrington to say a little bit about the structure of tonight's event.

0:24

So we're gonna begin by um allowing um each of the candidates to introduce themselves.

0:30

Each candidate will have up to three minutes to do that.

0:33

I say up to three minutes, and there are 11 of you.

0:36

So let your conscience be your guide on how much time um you take.

0:41

Um after that, um since the only contested race is for finance committee, uh, we're gonna have the four um finance committee candidates invited up to the table.

0:55

That's gonna be three candidates for um two three-year terms and one candidate for uh filling out the remainder of the term uh uncat uncontested, but we'd like to have everyone um who's putting themselves forward for finance committee to give a chance to to speak to questions.

1:14

Um the moderator will ask a few questions that are prepared in advance, and then we'll turn it over to everyone in the room to ask any questions that you have as well.

1:25

When you're answering a question, whether it's from the moderator or from an audience member, please take up to 90 seconds to answer that question.

1:33

I'll be keeping a timer.

1:35

When you have 15 seconds left, I'll hold up the pink highlighter so you can know that.

1:41

Um you have no time left.

1:44

I'll hold up the town warrant to let you know things are taking a little bit too long.

1:51

Um and so when you see that, you know it's definitely time to quit.

1:55

Um to let you know, this is also being it recorded for broadcast on CTSB.

2:02

So uh when you're asking a question from the floor, please use that microphone there that you can see in the aisle.

2:09

When you ask a question, please clearly state your name.

2:13

Um, and then state your question and direct your question to a specific um you know board person or um all the candidates directly.

Unassigned speaker

2:25

I'd like

Speaker 1

2:26

to thank our organizers for this event.

2:28

That's the Republican and Democratic Town Committees as well as the newsletter.

2:35

Eileen Mooney.

2:37

Synonymous with the newsletter.

2:39

Um we'll give you a 30-second rebuttal if a candidate specifically names is is named in another's response.

2:47

That being said, let's just take a minute to talk about conduct.

2:50

I ask you to please keep all questions and comments civil, focused on policy or qualifications.

2:58

I'm gonna ask you all, please refrain from personal attacks tonight.

3:02

Okay.

3:03

I can't stop you from being mean to each other outside of this forum.

3:09

For the next 90 minutes.

3:11

Let's refrain from

Unassigned speaker

3:12

that.

Speaker 1

3:13

All right.

3:14

That being said, let's begin.

3:17

Um generally speaking, we'll go for the introductions in order that the candidates

Unassigned speaker

3:22

are

Speaker 1

3:23

presented um in the newsletter.

3:25

Um, but because Michael Weiss has a time commitment elsewhere, um, he's gonna be going first.

3:30

So, Michael, please take up to three minutes to introduce yourself.

Michael Wise · Speaker 2Inferred

3:41

I'm Michael Wise.

3:42

I'm running for moderator again.

3:43

I've done it for 10 years, and as you know, a remarkable amount can be said in three minutes.

3:49

Um I'm learning how to do the job.

Unassigned speaker

3:53

Well,

Michael Wise · Speaker 2Inferred

3:53

obviously I'm running again because I think I can do it well.

3:56

I think the meetings have been run reasonably efficiently and reasonably positively.

4:01

I'm open to suggestions for change.

4:03

I look forward to seeing you all next Saturday.

Unassigned speaker

4:06

And

Michael Wise · Speaker 2Inferred

4:06

I'm open with any questions you might

Unassigned speaker

4:08

have.

Unassigned speaker

4:13

Um CPA where the um say.

Unassigned speaker

4:25

Um overwriting the question that all that um what if we get forum would be to do that meeting or

Speaker 3

4:40

repeat?

Michael Wise · Speaker 2Inferred

4:41

Probably, as you know, when we reach an item like that, the usual practice is to go through it line by line, item by item, and look for questions, comments, objections to each particular item.

Unassigned speaker

4:53

The time to raise a general one at the very beginning is a fine time to do it before we do we go through the list because it might affect all of them.

Michael Wise · Speaker 2Inferred

5:00

Because it might affect all of

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████████21%
Education Funding████████████████████20%
Community Engagement████████████12%
Public Engagement████████8%
Budget Equity Analysis███████7%
Economic Development███████7%
Procedural██████6%
Emergency Medical Services█████5%
Library Services████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Great Barrington Candidates Forum – April 28, 2026

On April 28, 2026, the town of Great Barrington held a candidates forum organized by the Republican and Democratic Town Committees and Eileen Mooney's newsletter. No agenda or minutes were provided, so this summary is based solely on the raw transcript. Eleven candidates introduced themselves, and the Finance Committee received extended questioning because it was the only contested race. The moderator set rules: three-minute introductions, 90-second answers, a pink highlighter warning at 15 seconds, the town warrant as an overtime signal, and a 30-second rebuttal if a candidate was named. The forum was recorded for broadcast on CTSB.

Candidate Introductions

  • Michael Weiss, running for re-election as moderator, said he has served for 10 years and believes meetings have been run efficiently and positively. Asked about handling warrant articles, he said he usually lists items individually but a general objection can be raised at the start; he also noted a substitute moderator will preside over the last two residential exemption articles.
  • Dr. Ruby Chang, running for the Board of Health, said she is a retired pediatrician with more than 40 years of practice and 10 years on the Board. She cited work on Title V, vaccinations, communicable diseases, hauler regulations, and dark sky regulations, and noted Great Barrington's hauling costs are about $82,000 a year, with each haul costing about $600.
  • Donna Jacobs, library trustee candidate, highlighted her social work and psychoanalytic training, her affection for both Great Barrington and Housatonic, and her dual involvement with the library trustees and the Great Barrington Library Fund.
  • Sharon Shalow, incumbent library trustee candidate, said she has served a two-year term and chaired the board. She stressed the importance of libraries as trusted sources of information in an era of misinformation.
  • Michelle Costa Luber, Finance Committee candidate, said she was born and raised in Great Barrington, holds an MPA from Westfield State, previously served on the Finance Committee, and was appointed last year to fill a vacancy. She emphasized openness, transparency, accountability, and ethics.
  • Rayo Matsuzaki, Finance Committee candidate, said he is a political science professor at Trinity College with a PhD from MIT and a background in forensic data analysis. He said listening to the town budget process convinced him to run.
  • Olivia Ramsey, Finance Committee candidate, said her family moved from New York City in September, she has worked in education for 25 years, runs preschools and a tutoring business, and served on the Du Bois Principal Search Committee.
  • Jeffrey Rothenberg, Finance Committee candidate for the one-year unexpired term, said he has an MBA, worked at General Electric and Accenture, and is chief development officer at the UMass Amherst Foundation. He said representative democracy carries a duty to give back.
  • Jackie Kane, Planning Board candidate, said she has served three years as a Planning Board associate and cannot vote in that role. She cited the Simon's Rock campus overlay district and residential cluster development as important zoning work from last year's town meeting.
  • The moderator acknowledged Ben Elliott as the Select Board candidate, but no introduction from him appears in the transcript.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Sandy Pantono, an outgoing library trustee, asked Donna Jacobs about potential conflicts of interest from serving on both the library trustees and the Great Barrington Library Fund. Jacobs said she would recuse herself from discussions and votes involving the Library Fund.
  • An audience member asked Dr. Ruby Chang whether the Board of Health should be expanded. Chang said the same three members have served together, more members would help cover the workload, and further discussion should involve the town manager.
  • Phil Orenstein asked Finance Committee candidates how they would manage the difficult, personal trade-offs inherent in budget decisions.
  • Walter Atwood advised Finance Committee candidates to ensure there is a strong association dealing with the Select Board and School Committee, and to get a handle on school choice.
  • A resident from 325 North Plain Road said taxes are out of control, the town's credit rating has dropped, and the town should cut expenses such as the $91,000 mausoleum preservation project. The resident cited about $5 million in free cash tied to marijuana-related lawsuit payments, including over $4 million to Theory Wellness, $189,000 to one firm, $315,000 to another, and $118,000 to another. He opposed Proposition 2½ and the residential exemption, asked about Housatonic Water, and said he would tell everyone to vote no on Proposition 2½.
  • A resident from 253 Long Pond asked candidates how they would ensure accountability for every dollar spent and how they would use creative initiatives to prevent future financial problems.

Finance Committee Discussion: School Budget

  • The moderator noted the Berkshire Hills Regional School District assessment is about $23.8 million and asked how candidates would respond if school spending continues to outpace town revenue growth.
  • Rayo Matsuzaki said the school share of about 75% of the town budget is unsustainable. He called for long-term regional agreement negotiations with Stockbridge and West Stockbridge, and for short-term scrutiny of tuition arrangements.
  • Michelle Costa Luber said the April 9 joint Finance Committee and Select Board meeting addressed the town's relationship with Berkshire Hills. She noted that school finance committee meetings are now held at 4 p.m., making attendance difficult, and said communication norms between the two bodies are essential.
  • Several candidates said they would not be a rubber stamp on the school budget. Olivia Ramsey said she would be comfortable voting no, but only after fully understanding the budget from multiple perspectives. Rayo Matsuzaki also said he would not be afraid to vote no. Jeffrey Rothenberg said a no vote would create a real crisis and would require a great deal to have gone wrong.
  • Candidates also emphasized the need to consider both student needs and taxpayer burdens, including retirees on fixed incomes.

Finance Committee Discussion: Ambulance Funding

  • The moderator asked about the town's proposed $327,000 ambulance contract and a citizen petition for $490,000 to fund 50% of two new ambulances.
  • Candidates described reliable emergency medical services as a top life-safety priority. Several said the negotiated operating amount was reasonable and that a predictable contract with the ambulance vendor is important.
  • Michelle Costa Luber noted the Finance Committee and Select Board had not yet taken a final vote. Rayo Matsuzaki said ambulance costs are rising because of broader healthcare and insurance costs, but the town and the ambulance service appear willing to keep negotiating.
  • Olivia Ramsey said life safety is always her top budget priority, and she praised the process that brought the cost down while preserving service.

Finance Committee Discussion: Proposition 2½, Taxes, and Revenue

  • Michelle Costa Luber said she is not supporting the Proposition 2½ override and also opposes the residential exemption. She said taxpayers are already drowning in taxes, past mistakes should not be blamed on taxpayers, and a one-year debt exclusion could have been used. She urged candidates to remember lower-income residents, including people who cannot afford to shop in Great Barrington.
  • Rayo Matsuzaki said the town cannot keep borrowing, free cash has been nearly depleted, and bond ratings matter. He argued the town needs new revenue sources, including tourism and redevelopment, and said if voters approve warrant spending, they have a responsibility to approve the Proposition 2½ override to pay for it. He warned that depleting cash reserves is financially irresponsible.
  • One candidate said Proposition 2½ is a reality because fixed costs outpace 2.5%, and the budget has already been reviewed line by line. Another candidate said she needed more research on Proposition 2½ and the residential exemption, and suggested examining tax thresholds, second-homeowners, and tourism revenue.
  • Candidates discussed expanding the tax base by attracting businesses. Jeffrey Rothenberg cited Hadley, Massachusetts as a business-friendly model. Rayo Matsuzaki noted Great Barrington has a relatively small commercial tax base and a uniform tax rate. Michelle Costa Luber recalled past car dealerships and said Great Barrington's commercial base is only about 16%, which limits the feasibility of a split tax rate.

Finance Committee Discussion: Accountability and Economic Development

  • In response to the accountability question, Michelle Costa Luber said she disagrees that there is nothing to cut, pointing to a $1 million procurement-related set-aside in the budget. She said taxpayers, not town officials, end up paying for mistakes, and finance members must ask uncomfortable questions.
  • Olivia Ramsey said accountability requires not stopping until answers are explicit, and then explaining the due diligence process clearly to taxpayers.
  • Jeffrey Rothenberg said accountability must be shared by town staff, the Finance Committee, the Select Board, and voters who come to town meeting educated. He also urged the town to pursue state and federal grants and work closely with elected officials.
  • Rayo Matsuzaki said transparency is not the same as overwhelming information. He suggested presenting budget information in a more readable way so voters can make informed decisions.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes or decisions were made; this was a candidates forum.
  • Finance Committee candidates agreed on the need for better communication with the Berkshire Hills Regional School District, stronger accountability, and expanded revenue sources.
  • Candidates disagreed on Proposition 2½ and the residential exemption, with Michelle Costa Luber opposing both and others expressing conditional support or a need for further research.
  • Voters were urged by the moderator to attend the annual town meeting, vote, and enjoy refreshments after the forum.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everybody, and welcome. Um welcome to the candidates forum for the town of Great Barrington. It's so nice to have you here. Um this is your chance, all of our chance to um meet the candidates for office in the town um of Great Barrington to say a little bit about the structure of tonight's event. So we're gonna begin by um allowing um each of the candidates to introduce themselves. Each candidate will have up to three minutes to do that. I say up to three minutes, and there are 11 of you. So let your conscience be your guide on how much time um you take. Um after that, um since the only contested race is for finance committee, uh, we're gonna have the four um finance committee candidates invited up to the table. That's gonna be three candidates for um two three-year terms and one candidate for uh filling out the remainder of the term uh uncat uncontested, but we'd like to have everyone um who's putting themselves forward for finance committee to give a chance to to speak to questions. Um the moderator will ask a few questions that are prepared in advance, and then we'll turn it over to everyone in the room to ask any questions that you have as well. When you're answering a question, whether it's from the moderator or from an audience member, please take up to 90 seconds to answer that question. I'll be keeping a timer. When you have 15 seconds left, I'll hold up the pink highlighter so you can know that. Um you have no time left. I'll hold up the town warrant to let you know things are taking a little bit too long. Um and so when you see that, you know it's definitely time to quit. Um to let you know, this is also being it recorded for broadcast on CTSB. So uh when you're asking a question from the floor, please use that microphone there that you can see in the aisle. When you ask a question, please clearly state your name. Um, and then state your question and direct your question to a specific um you know board person or um all the candidates directly. I'd like to thank our organizers for this event. That's the Republican and Democratic Town Committees as well as the newsletter. Eileen Mooney. Synonymous with the newsletter. Um we'll give you a 30-second rebuttal if a candidate specifically names is is named in another's response. That being said, let's just take a minute to talk about conduct. I ask you to please keep all questions and comments civil, focused on policy or qualifications. I'm gonna ask you all, please refrain from personal attacks tonight. Okay. I can't stop you from being mean to each other outside of this forum. For the next 90 minutes. Let's refrain from that. All right. That being said, let's begin. Um generally speaking, we'll go for the introductions in order that the candidates are presented um in the newsletter. Um, but because Michael Weiss has a time commitment elsewhere, um, he's gonna be going first. So, Michael, please take up to three minutes to introduce yourself. I'm Michael Wise. I'm running for moderator again. I've done it for 10 years, and as you know, a remarkable amount can be said in three minutes. Um I'm learning how to do the job. Well, obviously I'm running again because I think I can do it well. I think the meetings have been run reasonably efficiently and reasonably positively. I'm open to suggestions for change.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com