Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
This meeting focused on enforcement issues at the Thrushwood Lane (Estates) development, followed by an extensive discussion on potential zoning changes to promote economic development, including hotel room limits, overlay districts, and permit process streamlining.
Done three weeks ago. And it looks much different. It's cleaner. It's neater. They had all these people working there with trucks. And boulders moved. I mean, I can't. This is superficial. It's just look and feel. But the boulders have been moved and placed as if that's where they're supposed to be creating a sense of the separation. The one house that looked like it had a for sale sign on it. But it was very messy. And then there's the there's one lot that just looks it's been from the very beginning with all sorts of issues. But but the yards, I don't know, somebody was really working on them on the way it looked. So I can't say that anything is structurally different, but it looked better. I just want to apologize to folks online. I realized we were muted there while I was updating the board. In quick summary, I just informed the board that the town is folding permits that maybe currently open and active on Thrush for the read as a means of enforcement. Go ahead, sorry. So I just it was ironic that I would drive by. I mean, at the time I was wanting to see if it changed much from three weeks ago, and it had cleaned up a lot. It did not look like it was suffering like it was a few weeks ago. Okay. So whether they've heard you or somebody came in and stepped up. I think the um the letter that was sent is pretty clear about what the issues were, and so it would be easy at point in time to use that letter as a means of going back and um having it function as a checklist almost. Um okay. Um was there anything more to your update? Not from me. Is there anything else you'd like to investigate or discuss? Or have this notion about the ownership that you mentioned? Like I mean, when you buy a piece of property, you inherit all the good and the bad. So why is there a question about you just said some question about ownership and the lease and complicated to enforce anything? More in terms of the of the development entity, which was originally Stone Path development, then Linux landings. Now then it became Linux landings transitions. Um forgetting the names. Um and now those interests are mostly held by uh hybrid built home, which I think that's the name. So there's a number of entities that came along in the in the trail of the original developers. Um meanwhile, lots were transacted out now to private individual homeowners, so who are now becoming members of the estate's homeowners association. Um the original developers, the the folks that you would um you know who had said this is what we'll do. Uh that told the plane well, this is what we'll do, and we're in return to release in a certain governance of the RCs. Um that particular developer only owns one lot currently that we can tell as a home monitor, which I believe is for said. Meanwhile, that developed has sold other lots that built, some of which are on their development and some aren't.