OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Great Barrington, Massachusetts/Selectboard & Town Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Great Barrington Planning Board Meeting – September 10, 2026

Selectboard & Town Boards — Thursday, September 10, 2026
BodyGreat Barrington, Massachusetts
SessionSelectboard & Town Boards
DateThursday, September 10, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:34:05

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:01

Just a quick recap.

0:03

We've approved the minutes.

0:04

We just started talking about IO3 bylaw and then in terms of 5G and small cell wireless.

0:10

The town manager did find a sample bylaw that Barnes were as in effect.

0:17

I'm not reviewed it yet, but I can share it with all of the essentially the issue with 5G wireless antennas and small cell wireless telecommunications networks.

0:33

In a nutshell, the federal law allows these things to be essentially placed where needed, and there's there's little control that the municipalities have over where these go.

0:47

Um and in most cases, these are in public right, for example, on telephone poles or standalone poles.

0:56

So something with public right and what is not controlled by its model, and that's why the general in general code file, general pilots.

1:04

Um what some towns have done, I believe Pittsfield may also have done this in relation to Barnstable.

1:11

What some towns have done has been past regulations to say um try to try to say this is where we prefer them to be co-located on polls with other facilities or designed in a certain side where they should look a certain way, you know, they should just be big eyes every 50 feet down the main road towards the end of so the bylaws uh on 5G and small cell generals generally have to do with preferred placement and preferred um aesthetics if you want, and usually some sort of process for the telecommunications companies to seek those permits, but in general, those permits can't be unusable with held.

1:58

I'm not sure if that's the specific language

Speaker 2

2:00

of the telecommunications

Speaker 1

2:02

act, but something like

Speaker 3

2:04

um, so these are antennas, yes.

2:08

In general, I'm not like we have are they repeaters?

2:12

These are like every 100 feet or something, yeah.

Speaker 1

2:14

Yeah, I'm not sure the exact distance, but they're they're very frequent.

2:18

And and do they I don't know the size of the transformer with any idea?

2:24

My sense is that in some cases you may have um like equipment to power them, uh you put on the ground, could be on the ground, it could be co-located on a utility pole, maybe help the ball of the snow line like helping cleaned

Unassigned speaker

2:44

up, you

Speaker 1

2:44

can get like a transform and one, or maybe something small.

2:48

The antenna may look like the sheet of tape, you know, that's uh um just for speculation.

2:57

That's you can make

Speaker 2

2:59

but no, they're not big, uh they're not big towers.

Speaker 1

3:02

Right, right.

Speaker 2

3:05

Um, so

Speaker 1

3:06

that's not so that that 5G small cell wireless is something that these two goals have decided that it should be something um rated.

Speaker 4

3:15

What does it do for us?

Speaker 1

3:18

Gives you some control about where they go and what they look like.

Speaker 5

3:22

We ask your question again very specifically.

Unassigned speaker

3:25

What are you trying to do?

Speaker 5

3:26

What I'm

Speaker 4

3:26

trying to understand is

Speaker 5

3:28

what

Speaker 4

3:28

they first off, what is it?

3:31

What ad is it performing for us and why we're happy to have them or we need them?

3:37

That's my first question.

3:38

And my major question.

Speaker 5

3:40

Yeah, that that's probably we probably need to do a little research.

3:43

Um, I'm not an expert and wireless telecommunications, but my understanding is that the smaller, more frequent antennas allow data to travel more quickly and help enable things like autonomous vehicles and and it is a the direction the technology has is moving, and probably is already moved beyond 5G, and we're gonna be in a situation of playing catch-up, but maybe something like this sets up precedent that we do want to have some control as a community over how it's cited.

4:20

But I mean, Chris is 100% right, the FCC regulates these sorts of installations as part of like you know, the common good, and so local communities have very little control over the technology agenda.

4:36

So the question is do we want to just let it happen or do we want to try and guide it?

Speaker 3

4:41

But is it something that would normally just happen in the downtown area or in Musicronic or something?

4:47

You're not gonna be doing rural landscapes with the site, but we don't

Unassigned speaker

4:52

know.

Speaker 3

4:52

I don't know, either.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Um and my other experience is that when we have say we have a cell tower application come before us, right?

Speaker 5

5:04

We've had several of those.

5:05

And when we look at the cell tower applications, there's like a frame system that holds pieces of equipment, right?

5:14

And among those pieces of equipment are the antennas, and they're like, you know, small boxes that get mounted on.

5:20

And so you can look at fair view and you can look over by WSBS.

5:24

And when you look up and you see the cell tower, there are these like gray boxes that are mounted.

5:29

That's an individual antenna.

5:31

So my understanding is that those antennas, similar size, get moved to utility polls for co-location.

5:37

Um yeah, so I think we probably need to do a little bit of yeah to understand what it looks like.

5:44

And if there, I think there's all right, some installment here, right?

5:48

But

Speaker 4

5:49

and the companies that is doing it, we know who actually needs

Speaker 5

5:53

it.

5:53

It's the telecommunication companies.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Economic Development██████████11%
Technology and Innovation███████8%
Procedural██████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Public Safety█████5%
Public Engagement█████5%
Agriculture███3%
Community Engagement███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Great Barrington Planning Board Meeting – September 10, 2026

The meeting covered discussions on potential bylaws for 5G small cell wireless and abandoned buildings, along with several zoning amendment proposals including hotel room limits, overlay district extensions, and modifications to the Simon's Rock campus overlay district. The board scheduled future meetings to delve into these topics and also addressed public comments and permitting process concerns.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of minutes (no further details provided in the transcript).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Vivian expressed interest in contributing to the 5G research and raised concerns about data center regulations following Governor Healy's executive order. She offered to provide an article link.
  • Eileen noted audio difficulties for online attendees, attributing them to microphone placement.
  • James supported removing the hotel room limit but expressed concerns about enforcement and potential profit for a property owner (Mr. Majito).

Discussion Items

5G and Small Cell Wireless Bylaw

  • Discussion on limited municipal control under federal law; antennas often placed in public rights-of-way.
  • Town manager found a sample bylaw from Barnstable but had not yet reviewed it.
  • Board agreed to gather more background information and schedule a dedicated meeting later in the fall.

Abandoned Buildings Bylaw

  • Member raised concerns about unsecured buildings causing public safety risks (vandalism, trespass, fire).
  • Debate on scope (all buildings vs. non-residential) and potential overlap with existing building code.
  • Decision: Town planner will check if building code already covers security; board will decide after further investigation.

Draft Zoning Amendments

A1: Hotel/Motel Room Limits (Section 7.10.2)
  • Current limit of 45 rooms per hotel/motel. Jonathan provided data on existing Great Barrington hotels (e.g., Fairfield Inn – 93 rooms) and new Lenox hotels (90+ rooms).
  • Proposal to strike Section 7.10.2 entirely, removing the room cap while retaining the special permit process.
  • Debate on economic impacts, feasibility, and potential locations. No final decision; scheduled for dedicated discussion on October 8.
A2: Extension of Pentatonic Mills Revitalization Overlay District to Rising Mill Property (Section 9.8)
  • Proposal to extend the overlay through the Industrial Zone to include the Rising Mill property.
  • Discussion on zoning map and carved-out residential properties; board agreed to explore details and map at the October 8 meeting.
B: Model Bylaws for Seasonal Communities
  • State released model bylaws for small wind and battery storage; board awaiting more information.
  • Also discussed regional need for a USDA-approved animal processing facility; sewer/water availability in Great Barrington noted as an asset.
  • Decision: Further research needed; scheduled for October 22.
C: Simon's Rock Campus Overlay District (Section 9.15)
  • Discussion on permitted uses, limitations to existing buildings, and potential revisions.
  • Board considered moving certain uses from by-right to special permit and possibly striking co-living.
  • Decision: Review current language at the next meeting (September 24).

Town Planner's Report

  • Valley Association to present on Housatonic and Green River watershed work at the September 24 meeting.
  • Special permit application for a front fence replacement noted.

Board and Subcommittee Updates

  • Jackie reported persistent delays in fire department permitting for apartment renovations, expressing frustration with the review process. She noted inability to start construction despite a 15-day review requirement. Concerns to be raised with the town administrator and select board.
  • Jeremy provided Community Preservation Committee (CPC) dates: Step 1 applications due November 6 with review on November 10; Step 2 applications due December 11 with reviews on December 15, January 5–7, 2027.

Key Outcomes

  • Next meeting (September 24): Focus on campus overlay district revisions.
  • October 8: Discuss hotel room limits and overlay extension to Rising Mill.
  • October 22: Seasonal communities model bylaws.
  • November: Animal processing facility feasibility.
  • 5G and abandoned buildings: Further research before scheduling.
  • Jackie's concerns about fire department permitting to be escalated to town administration.
  • Public comments noted.

Meeting Transcript

Just a quick recap. We've approved the minutes. We just started talking about IO3 bylaw and then in terms of 5G and small cell wireless. The town manager did find a sample bylaw that Barnes were as in effect. I'm not reviewed it yet, but I can share it with all of the essentially the issue with 5G wireless antennas and small cell wireless telecommunications networks. In a nutshell, the federal law allows these things to be essentially placed where needed, and there's there's little control that the municipalities have over where these go. Um and in most cases, these are in public right, for example, on telephone poles or standalone poles. So something with public right and what is not controlled by its model, and that's why the general in general code file, general pilots. Um what some towns have done, I believe Pittsfield may also have done this in relation to Barnstable. What some towns have done has been past regulations to say um try to try to say this is where we prefer them to be co-located on polls with other facilities or designed in a certain side where they should look a certain way, you know, they should just be big eyes every 50 feet down the main road towards the end of so the bylaws uh on 5G and small cell generals generally have to do with preferred placement and preferred um aesthetics if you want, and usually some sort of process for the telecommunications companies to seek those permits, but in general, those permits can't be unusable with held. I'm not sure if that's the specific language of the telecommunications act, but something like um, so these are antennas, yes. In general, I'm not like we have are they repeaters? These are like every 100 feet or something, yeah. Yeah, I'm not sure the exact distance, but they're they're very frequent. And and do they I don't know the size of the transformer with any idea? My sense is that in some cases you may have um like equipment to power them, uh you put on the ground, could be on the ground, it could be co-located on a utility pole, maybe help the ball of the snow line like helping cleaned up, you can get like a transform and one, or maybe something small. The antenna may look like the sheet of tape, you know, that's uh um just for speculation. That's you can make but no, they're not big, uh they're not big towers. Right, right. Um, so that's not so that that 5G small cell wireless is something that these two goals have decided that it should be something um rated. What does it do for us? Gives you some control about where they go and what they look like. We ask your question again very specifically. What are you trying to do? What I'm trying to understand is what they first off, what is it? What ad is it performing for us and why we're happy to have them or we need them? That's my first question. And my major question. Yeah, that that's probably we probably need to do a little research. Um, I'm not an expert and wireless telecommunications, but my understanding is that the smaller, more frequent antennas allow data to travel more quickly and help enable things like autonomous vehicles and and it is a the direction the technology has is moving, and probably is already moved beyond 5G, and we're gonna be in a situation of playing catch-up, but maybe something like this sets up precedent that we do want to have some control as a community over how it's cited. But I mean, Chris is 100% right, the FCC regulates these sorts of installations as part of like you know, the common good, and so local communities have very little control over the technology agenda. So the question is do we want to just let it happen or do we want to try and guide it? But is it something that would normally just happen in the downtown area or in Musicronic or something? You're not gonna be doing rural landscapes with the site, but we don't know. I don't know, either. Um and my other experience is that when we have say we have a cell tower application come before us, right? We've had several of those. And when we look at the cell tower applications, there's like a frame system that holds pieces of equipment, right? And among those pieces of equipment are the antennas, and they're like, you know, small boxes that get mounted on.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com