OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Great Barrington, Massachusetts/Selectboard & Town Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Great Barrington Select Board and Library Trustees Joint Meeting on Ramsdell Library - September 22, 2026

Selectboard & Town Boards — Tuesday, September 22, 2026
BodyGreat Barrington, Massachusetts
SessionSelectboard & Town Boards
DateTuesday, September 22, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:54:14

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Pursue it to MGL 7C 38 and 20 M after notifying the chair of a public body.

0:06

Any person may make a video audio recording of an open session of a meeting of a public body might transmit the meeting for any meeting.

0:14

Beginning of the meeting, the chair shall inform other attendees of any such record.

0:19

Speaking is recorded being recorded by the Burger Edge, by CGSB, and by the town of Great Barrington.

0:26

Any member of the public wishing to speak at the meeting must receive permission of the chair.

0:31

The listing of agenda items for those reasonably anticipated by the chair, which may be discussed at the meeting.

0:37

Not all items listed may in fact be discussed, and other items not listed may be brought up for discussion to the extent created by law.

Unassigned speaker

0:46

So we'll start call the select board to order, and we have one number virtually, so we'll do a roll call vote, and then we'll include them when he gets here.

Speaker 1

0:56

So roll call bill.

1:03

And myself.

1:22

Yeah, I don't think here.

1:24

Okay.

1:24

Well, let's give them another minute and then we'll turn it over to the Garden Man and Durham.

1:30

They may have presentation.

Speaker 2

2:21

So thank you everyone for coming tonight.

2:24

Um I really do appreciate it.

2:28

I um we as you know, we received a letter from um the Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding um Pete Perry Dean and Roders, um the architects proposal and alternative study.

2:49

Um and the letters dated September 8th, and it had a lot of um feedback on the report that was triggering that I believe there were seven items on the last second to last page page eight, which you had handouts.

3:13

But there were uh eight or people seven recommendations for the town to actually hire a consultant to work with the town to achieve.

3:31

And um, and I felt that this was absolutely necessary for town staff to have the two elected boards talk about the letter, talk about the project, talk about the progress of the project, and what decisions and how to move forward is because um because there's financial impacts, there's all sorts of things that we need to talk about.

4:02

Um board, so I don't feel that it is within the town manager's purview to make those um those decisions in a vacuum.

4:12

That's not my that's not in my jurisdiction.

4:14

That's in the jurisdiction of one, the select board as the owners of the building, and then the trustees as the um as the board that is for the care and custody of the building.

4:28

Um we just take our direction from the elected officials.

4:33

So that being said, um, I believe there's some items that we just need to have conversation about tonight.

4:40

One is the letter, whether or not the consultant is something that has to be done, or um is a suggestion.

4:51

Um, or is it absolutely necessary?

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Um, another topic that needs to be discussed is whether or not that um can be met within the timelines of the NBLC grant um achieved.

Speaker 2

5:07

And then also if it is possible to do that, then what is the end result of actually going forward with PCLC grant?

Unassigned speaker

5:19

Yeah,

Speaker 2

5:25

um and moving forward with the actual MBLC grant and what does that mean financially for the town?

5:35

Because one of the things that transpired um since right before the letter was received, as you know, are some other um we have a special town meeting that's coming up that is um that is going to address one of the articles on it is also going to address another town owned facility, a cook's garage.

5:56

And so we have to talk about all of the responsibilities and requirements that we have already, and how how are we going to move forward with this?

6:05

So I need I need you two to be talking to each other so we can figure out how to move forward on ramstone specifically.

Speaker 3

6:13

Okay.

Speaker 2

6:14

So that's it and kind of in a nutshell.

Speaker 1

6:18

So do you want to address where we are financially and what this would call us to go forward about the final dog is?

Speaker 2

6:25

So I think that I think the best thing first is um well, we we can definitely do that.

6:33

Um if if the boards decide that we should move forward with the grant and proceeding with the efforts to actually um continue the efforts with the MBLC grant, um, then that means that we are committed to actually bringing it to town meeting for a vote, and that we have a game plan financially for

Unassigned speaker

7:02

it.

Speaker 2

7:03

Um, but that has yet to be discussed.

7:07

Cost estimates have yet to be discussed.

7:10

I have do not know what the project is, um, because that still hasn't been decided now that this letter has kind of grown, like what is what is it gonna be built, what is going to be worked on within the scope of the grant, and then what is eligible for the grant versus not eligible for the grant, and how are we going to pay for

Unassigned speaker

7:31

that?

Speaker 2

7:32

Um as of right now, um, as a reminder, we do not have any free cash to utilize that closes out on uh June 30th at every year.

7:44

So even for a consultant, I do not have access to free cash to pay for a consultant.

7:50

Okay.

7:51

Um, and then as far as borrowing capacity and our levy limit, we only have roughly 500,000 in our levy limit.

8:01

Um, to give you uh a kind of a snapshot as to

Unassigned speaker

8:08

a

Speaker 2

8:09

couple of years ago, the town went and actually authorized and borrowed 11 million dollars for capital expenditures.

8:17

And that was at a uh when the bond um when the actual percentage was at a uh a little bit more favorable, and then our standard and poor's rating was at a higher level.

8:30

And within that 11 million dollars that was borrowed, that added one million dollars to our debt expenditure line within our operating.

8:40

So that kind of gives you a ballpark that was three years ago, two and a half three years ago that that happened.

8:47

So that kind of gives you a rough estimate as to when we were in a fit more favorable um financial capacity uh as far as our bond rating, as far as what the interest rates were at the time as well.

9:04

11 million dollars added 1 million dollars to our operating costs.

9:12

We do not have one million dollars to add to our operating costs, we don't even have 500,000, even half of that.

9:22

So um so even a project that would cost five million dollars would add a significant amount of burden onto our operating costs.

9:33

Okay, so again, this is something that the community needs to talk about and make a decision on which direction we want to go.

Unassigned speaker

9:46

If if it is something that you want the VMLC moving forward, then we have to understand what the strategy I have to understand and know we have to come up with a strategy on how to fund it and how to actually commit to it because that's gonna take a lot of time and resources, time as town staff and um and coordination as well as town meetings as well.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████37%
Funding█████████████████████████25%
Procedural████████8%
Budget Equity Analysis████████8%
Public Engagement█████5%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Fiscal Sustainability████4%
Zoning And Land Use████4%
Economic Development███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Great Barrington Select Board and Library Trustees Joint Meeting on Ramsdell Library - September 22, 2026

The Select Board and the Library Trustees of Ramsdell Library held a joint meeting to discuss a September 8, 2026 letter from the Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) regarding the proposed renovation and expansion of the Ramsdell Library. The central topics included the MHC's seven recommendations, the feasibility of meeting deadlines for a $9.4 million MBLC grant, financial constraints, and the path forward for the project.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • John Nelson, co-chair of the Ramsdell Building Committee, expressed full support for the architectural firm Perry Dean Rogers & Partners (PDR), noting their unanimous selection and experience with historic preservation. He emphasized that the firm's philosophy was to retain and respect the original 1906 building.
  • Deepa Venket, from CHA (Owners Project Manager), detailed the project timeline and funding process. She explained that cost estimates were originally scheduled for November 2026, but the MHC letter has caused delays. She noted that the MBLC requires certified votes by June 2027, and obtaining an extension beyond that date could result in losing the grant entirely.
  • Jimmy Bailey, a resident, criticized the lack of cost estimates and called the process a "pipe dream" for a select few. He urged the Select Board to prioritize the financial burdens on taxpayers, including the elderly and those struggling.
  • James Garzone, a resident, supported the Town Manager's fiscal caution, listing other essential town projects (wastewater, school, waterworks, PCBs, Cook's Garage) that total millions. He stated the town is "drowning in taxes and debt."
  • Frederica Siegel, co-chair of the Ramsdell Building Committee, reported that during the meeting, a donor had offered $10,000 to fund a historic preservation consultant if the town manager agrees to facilitate mediation. She urged the board not to end the process prematurely.
  • Several other residents spoke in favor of seeking an extension and working collaboratively, while others stressed the need for concrete cost figures before committing to the project.

Discussion Items

  • MHC Letter and Consultant: The letter recommended hiring an independent consultant to review alternatives to demolishing the 1930 addition. Library trustees and PDR argued the letter contained inaccuracies and that many recommendations (e.g., archival storage, construction protection) are standard and can be addressed through a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The group debated whether the consultant's findings would require a full redesign or simply a narrative assessment.
  • Financial Constraints: Town Manager Liz Hartwell stated that the town has no free cash available and only $500,000 in levy capacity. She emphasized that even a $5 million project would add a significant burden, and the town cannot afford a project without a clear cost estimate and revenue plan. She stated, "I cannot support moving forward with a five-plus million dollar project period."
  • Fundraising: Trustees reported that fundraising has been hindered by negative press and lack of clarity. They noted that potential donors are waiting for more project certainty. Some residents questioned the lack of documented pledges, while trustees stressed confidentiality.
  • Grant Deadlines and Extension: The first deadline is December 31, 2026, to complete the MHC process. A second deadline in June 2027 requires certified town meeting votes. CHA warned that an extension beyond June 2027 would likely cause loss of the grant and require a new application. The Select Board discussed requesting an extension from MBLC for both deadlines, acknowledging that even a successful December extension does not resolve the town's broader financial challenges.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to Request MBLC Extension: The Select Board voted unanimously (5-0) to request an extension from the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners for both the December 31, 2026 deadline and the spring 2027 deadline (roll call vote: Bill, Ben, Garfield, Eric, Phil all voted "aye"). The motion directed the appropriate parties to petition MBLC for the extension based on the MHC letter and financial uncertainties.
  • Motion to Approve Festival Latino Event: The board unanimously approved a special entertainment license and site plan for Festival Latino to use the Town Hall parking lot and gazebo on September 26, 2026.
  • Motion to Remove 45-Room Cap on Hotels: The board voted unanimously (5-0) to initiate a zoning amendment to remove the 45-room cap on new hotels, while keeping the existing special permit process. This requires public hearings and planning board input.
  • Motion to Approve Special Town Meeting Warrant: The board unanimously approved the warrant for the upcoming special town meeting, which includes articles for wastewater treatment (enterprise fund), Cook's Garage abatement, a clerical error correction, a citizen petition, and prior-year invoice payments.

Meeting Transcript

Pursue it to MGL 7C 38 and 20 M after notifying the chair of a public body. Any person may make a video audio recording of an open session of a meeting of a public body might transmit the meeting for any meeting. Beginning of the meeting, the chair shall inform other attendees of any such record. Speaking is recorded being recorded by the Burger Edge, by CGSB, and by the town of Great Barrington. Any member of the public wishing to speak at the meeting must receive permission of the chair. The listing of agenda items for those reasonably anticipated by the chair, which may be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed, and other items not listed may be brought up for discussion to the extent created by law. So we'll start call the select board to order, and we have one number virtually, so we'll do a roll call vote, and then we'll include them when he gets here. So roll call bill. And myself. Yeah, I don't think here. Okay. Well, let's give them another minute and then we'll turn it over to the Garden Man and Durham. They may have presentation. So thank you everyone for coming tonight. Um I really do appreciate it. I um we as you know, we received a letter from um the Massachusetts Historical Commission regarding um Pete Perry Dean and Roders, um the architects proposal and alternative study. Um and the letters dated September 8th, and it had a lot of um feedback on the report that was triggering that I believe there were seven items on the last second to last page page eight, which you had handouts. But there were uh eight or people seven recommendations for the town to actually hire a consultant to work with the town to achieve. And um, and I felt that this was absolutely necessary for town staff to have the two elected boards talk about the letter, talk about the project, talk about the progress of the project, and what decisions and how to move forward is because um because there's financial impacts, there's all sorts of things that we need to talk about. Um board, so I don't feel that it is within the town manager's purview to make those um those decisions in a vacuum. That's not my that's not in my jurisdiction. That's in the jurisdiction of one, the select board as the owners of the building, and then the trustees as the um as the board that is for the care and custody of the building. Um we just take our direction from the elected officials. So that being said, um, I believe there's some items that we just need to have conversation about tonight. One is the letter, whether or not the consultant is something that has to be done, or um is a suggestion. Um, or is it absolutely necessary? Um, another topic that needs to be discussed is whether or not that um can be met within the timelines of the NBLC grant um achieved. And then also if it is possible to do that, then what is the end result of actually going forward with PCLC grant? Yeah, um and moving forward with the actual MBLC grant and what does that mean financially for the town? Because one of the things that transpired um since right before the letter was received, as you know, are some other um we have a special town meeting that's coming up that is um that is going to address one of the articles on it is also going to address another town owned facility, a cook's garage. And so we have to talk about all of the responsibilities and requirements that we have already, and how how are we going to move forward with this? So I need I need you two to be talking to each other so we can figure out how to move forward on ramstone specifically. Okay. So that's it and kind of in a nutshell. So do you want to address where we are financially and what this would call us to go forward about the final dog is? So I think that I think the best thing first is um well, we we can definitely do that. Um if if the boards decide that we should move forward with the grant and proceeding with the efforts to actually um continue the efforts with the MBLC grant, um, then that means that we are committed to actually bringing it to town meeting for a vote, and that we have a game plan financially for it. Um, but that has yet to be discussed. Cost estimates have yet to be discussed. I have do not know what the project is, um, because that still hasn't been decided now that this letter has kind of grown, like what is what is it gonna be built, what is going to be worked on within the scope of the grant, and then what is eligible for the grant versus not eligible for the grant, and how are we going to pay for that? Um as of right now, um, as a reminder, we do not have any free cash to utilize that closes out on uh June 30th at every year. So even for a consultant, I do not have access to free cash to pay for a consultant. Okay. Um, and then as far as borrowing capacity and our levy limit, we only have roughly 500,000 in our levy limit. Um, to give you uh a kind of a snapshot as to a

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com