OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Great Barrington, Massachusetts/Selectboard & Town Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Great Barrington Conservation Commission Meeting - October 28, 2026

Selectboard & Town Boards — Wednesday, October 28, 2026
BodyGreat Barrington, Massachusetts
SessionSelectboard & Town Boards
DateWednesday, October 28, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 24:19

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

It's 6 30.

0:02

And I want to call the meeting at the Clear Bearington Conservation Commission to order.

0:07

First, we'll take a roll call.

0:10

Uh Andrew Mank?

0:12

Andrew.

0:14

Here.

0:15

Andy.

0:16

Here.

Speaker 2

0:17

Yeah.

0:18

Yes.

Speaker 1

0:19

Ashley.

Speaker 3

0:19

Here.

0:21

Yeah.

Speaker 1

0:21

I'm here.

0:23

Pursuant to MGL 7C 30A, Section 20 F.

0:30

After notifying the chair of the public body, any person may make a video or audio recording of an open session of the meeting of a public body.

0:40

Or may transmit the meeting through any meeting.

0:43

At the beginning of the meeting, the chair shall inform other attendees of any such recordings.

0:49

Any member of the public wishing to

Speaker 2

0:51

speak

Speaker 1

0:51

at the meeting must receive permission of the chair.

0:56

The listings of agenda items for those reasonably anticipated by the chair, which may be discussed at the meeting.

1:04

Not all items listed may in fact be discussed, and other items not listed may be brought up for discussion to the extent permitted by the is there anyone in the audience that is recording not seeing anyone.

1:42

So if it's all right with you guys, we'll just review the minutes when they're corrected and cleaned up at the next movement.

1:51

Um item number three.

1:54

Request for determination of applicability under the NAS Weapons Protection Act from John W.

2:00

Field Tree Service Inc.

2:02

on behalf of Rufus and Jill Jones.

2:06

Property of 101 Alfred Road, map 33 lot 76.

2:12

The proposed work consists of removal of John, I think it's 10 trees, not nine.

2:20

Are you there, John?

2:21

Yeah,

Speaker 4

2:21

I'm

Unassigned speaker

2:22

here.

Speaker 1

2:23

We're 10 trees, not nine.

2:28

So of 10 dead or dying trees within the 200 foot riverfront resource area of Seacon Brook.

2:36

Uh John, do you want to go ahead and make your presentation?

Speaker 4

2:41

Yeah, so uh the trees are nine of the 10 trees are ash, they're all dead because of Emerald Ash Bore.

2:53

Um they're already starting to break apart and fall down into sitting areas and and whatnot.

3:02

Um, and then there's one pretty good size dead sugar maple on the opposite side of the bank that leans for the house.

3:12

So really it's all it's all dead trees.

3:15

Um and we're only targeting the dead trees

Unassigned speaker

3:20

that

Speaker 4

3:21

could negatively impact uh people, otherwise they're gonna stay.

Speaker 1

3:28

Okay, and the commission did a site visit a few days ago.

3:33

I think all of the members were there except the one except Kate, maybe.

3:38

Um John, there was an issue about uh taking the stump out, grinding the stump, I believe, at the tree near the benches in the front yard as opposed to uh flush cutting to the stump of all the other trees,

Speaker 4

3:55

right?

3:56

So my estimate is only to flush cut them all.

4:00

We never I know we talked about it on the site, uh, but I never estimated stump grinding or anything.

4:07

I I think the two on the lawn he wants to have done, and the rest of our he couldn't care less about

Speaker 1

4:15

right.

4:15

That was my point.

4:16

Okay, yeah, okay.

Unassigned speaker

4:18

All

Speaker 1

4:18

right, so the two of the ten are are being grinded, and the rest are being cut to the stump.

4:24

Um does anybody have any questions about the application?

Speaker 2

4:31

No.

Speaker 1

4:32

Um

Speaker 2

4:32

very straightforward.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████57%
Tree Preservation██████████████████████28%
Public Engagement████████10%
Personnel Matters████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Great Barrington Conservation Commission Meeting - October 28, 2026

The Great Barrington Conservation Commission met on October 28, 2026 at 6:30 PM. The meeting was called to order with roll call, and members present included Andrew, Andy, Ashley, Kate, and others. The commission reviewed two Requests for Determination of Applicability (RDAs) for work within 200-foot riverfront resource areas and ratified an emergency certification for hazardous tree removal. A scheduling change and a potential conflict-of-interest disclosure by a commissioner were also discussed.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Naomi Blue, a property owner across from 3 C Conc Road, expressed support for Daniel Bello's proposed accessory building, noting the steep slope and dry conditions minimized environmental impact. She appreciated the commission's oversight.
  • The conservation agent thanked the public for following proper application procedures, emphasizing that compliance is achievable and that everyone can participate. This helps when dealing with less upstanding applicants.

Discussion Items

  1. RDA - John W. Field Tree Service Inc. (101 Alfred Road): The applicant requested to remove 10 dead or dying trees (9 ash affected by emerald ash borer and one sugar maple) within the riverfront area of Seacon Brook. Two trees would be stump-ground; the rest cut flush to the stump. All wood would be removed using ground protection and without crossing the stream. The commission had conducted a site visit and approved the application as amended to include a tenth tree. A motion to issue a Negative Determination #2 was made, seconded, and passed unanimously.
  2. RDA - Daniel Bello (3 C Conc Road): The proposal involved constructing an accessory building on an existing concrete pad that intrudes 6 feet into the riverfront resource area of Seacon Brook. Commission members noted the minimal additional impact due to the existing slab and circuitous drainage path. Public testimony supported the project. A motion for a Negative Determination #2 was made, seconded, and passed unanimously.
  3. Emergency Certification - Great Barrington Land Conservancy: The conservation agent reported that local arborist Tom Ingersoll organizes an annual volunteer work day for tree companies. This year's recipient is the Land Conservancy's River Walk and Riverfront Trail. The agent inspected both trails with Christine Ward and Tom Ingersoll and identified hazardous dead trees and limbs threatening public safety. The commission ratified the issuance of the emergency certification unanimously.
  4. Meeting Schedule: The regular November and December meetings (fourth Wednesdays) were inconvenient. The commission agreed to cancel the November meeting and hold a combined meeting on Wednesday, December 9, 2026.
  5. Commissioner Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure: Commissioner Andy disclosed that a significant property owner in Great Barrington had approached him for consulting on land use, unrelated to CONCOM. He consulted the Massachusetts Ethics Commission, which expressed concern about his participation even in a non-CONCOM capacity. Andy stated he would discuss options with the town (likely town counsel) and may need to recuse himself or resign from the commission. He put the commission on notice and will provide an update at the next meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved Negative Determination #2 for John W. Field Tree Service Inc. for removal of 10 hazardous trees at 101 Alfred Road.
  • Approved Negative Determination #2 for Daniel Bello for construction of an accessory building at 3 C Conc Road.
  • Ratified emergency certification for Great Barrington Land Conservancy to remove hazardous trees along the River Walk and Riverfront Trail.
  • Next commission meeting scheduled for December 9, 2026 (combined November/December meeting).
  • Commissioner Andy to follow up on conflict-of-interest matter with town officials.

Meeting Transcript

It's 6 30. And I want to call the meeting at the Clear Bearington Conservation Commission to order. First, we'll take a roll call. Uh Andrew Mank? Andrew. Here. Andy. Here. Yeah. Yes. Ashley. Here. Yeah. I'm here. Pursuant to MGL 7C 30A, Section 20 F. After notifying the chair of the public body, any person may make a video or audio recording of an open session of the meeting of a public body. Or may transmit the meeting through any meeting. At the beginning of the meeting, the chair shall inform other attendees of any such recordings. Any member of the public wishing to speak at the meeting must receive permission of the chair. The listings of agenda items for those reasonably anticipated by the chair, which may be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed, and other items not listed may be brought up for discussion to the extent permitted by the is there anyone in the audience that is recording not seeing anyone. So if it's all right with you guys, we'll just review the minutes when they're corrected and cleaned up at the next movement. Um item number three. Request for determination of applicability under the NAS Weapons Protection Act from John W. Field Tree Service Inc. on behalf of Rufus and Jill Jones. Property of 101 Alfred Road, map 33 lot 76. The proposed work consists of removal of John, I think it's 10 trees, not nine. Are you there, John? Yeah, I'm here. We're 10 trees, not nine. So of 10 dead or dying trees within the 200 foot riverfront resource area of Seacon Brook. Uh John, do you want to go ahead and make your presentation? Yeah, so uh the trees are nine of the 10 trees are ash, they're all dead because of Emerald Ash Bore. Um they're already starting to break apart and fall down into sitting areas and and whatnot. Um, and then there's one pretty good size dead sugar maple on the opposite side of the bank that leans for the house. So really it's all it's all dead trees. Um and we're only targeting the dead trees that could negatively impact uh people, otherwise they're gonna stay. Okay, and the commission did a site visit a few days ago. I think all of the members were there except the one except Kate, maybe. Um John, there was an issue about uh taking the stump out, grinding the stump, I believe, at the tree near the benches in the front yard as opposed to uh flush cutting to the stump of all the other trees, right? So my estimate is only to flush cut them all. We never I know we talked about it on the site, uh, but I never estimated stump grinding or anything.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com