OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Harrisonburg Planning Commission Meeting - December 11, 2024

City Council & Planning CommissionWednesday, December 11, 2024
BodyHarrisonburg, Virginia
SessionCity Council & Planning Commission
DateWednesday, December 11, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:12:35

Transcript — Verbatim
15:52

Wednesday, December 11th.

15:55

We have a quorum with six of six members present.

15:59

Um there's a seventh that will need to be filled next year.

16:05

Um do we have any corrections or motions for last month's minutes.

16:16

If there are none, Mr.

16:17

Church I'll move approval of the minutes as presented.

16:24

Second.

16:25

We have a motion from Commissioner Baugh to approve, a second from Commissioner Nardy.

16:31

All in favor of approving last month's minute say aye.

16:34

Aye aye.

16:35

Any opposed?

16:36

Any abstaining?

16:38

Okay.

16:40

We now move on to item three A in public hearings to consider a request to rezone one sixty Carpenter Lane.

16:49

Good evening.

16:51

So the applicant Winchester Equipment Company is proposing to rezone plus or minus two point nine one acre parcel from B Two General Business District to M1 uh General Industrial District.

17:04

This is the site where dates and interiors used to be.

17:08

Um the properties.

17:09

Oh, when we get to the page.

17:11

There we go.

17:13

The properties to the north, west, and east across I eighty-one are all zoned M1.

17:18

That property to the south of uh across Carpenter Lane is a county pro is in the county and is zoned B1.

17:30

The comprehensive plan designates this site as industrial, which allows for light and general manufacturing wholesaling warehousing and related activities.

17:38

That proposed use conforms with the general industrial land use guide designation.

17:45

The property is located at the end of Carpenter Lane next to Interstate 81.

17:50

Some of you might recall that in 2019, the adjacent property also rezoned from B1 to M1.

17:59

Or B2 to M1, rather.

18:03

So Winchester Equipment Company is a construction agricultural equipment firm uh company.

18:09

They are requested to rezone from B2 to M1.

18:12

If the rezoning is approved, they plan to move their operations from their current location on Charles Street to the subject site.

18:27

Any questions?

18:29

Do we have any questions for staff before we open the public hearing on this?

18:33

Questions for staff?

18:35

Okay.

18:36

I think most of us were on the site tour uh yesterday, so um I will invite the applicant or applicant's representative to speak to this request before we open the public hearing, if you would like uh to approach.

18:50

And if there's anything you want to add.

18:53

Um, other than uh my name is Scott Havermill.

18:56

I'm vice president of business development.

18:58

Been with the company for 10 years, and um we're wanting to move because we're currently leasing the property on Charles Street and opportunity to purchase a very visible and good location.

19:10

That's all I have.

19:11

Any questions for me?

19:13

Any questions for the applicant?

19:15

Yes, ma'am.

19:16

Yes.

19:16

Commissioner Nardy.

19:18

Okay.

19:19

Oh, yes.

19:20

Well, I did have a question, but you just answered it.

19:22

Why are you moving?

19:26

Any other questions for the applicant before we open the public hearing?

19:30

Okay, great.

19:30

Thank you.

19:32

Um I will read the phone number to call if you'd like to speak about this specifically this request.

19:40

The number to call in is 540437 2687-540-437-2687.

19:48

That'll open the public hearing and if there's anyone else that would like to speak um for, about, against this request now is uh now's the time.

20:00

And with there is a delay on the video feed, so we'll have to wait a little bit to allow the video the folks that might be watching at home to call in.

20:08

So bear with us.

20:37

I suppose something else we could do as I'm thinking I'm thinking out loud now is read the phone number and then invite the applicant to speak, and then yeah.

20:48

Trying to save some time.

21:05

Is Meg back there?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Planning And Zoning███████████13%
Technology and Innovation████████10%
Procedural████████9%
Engineering And Infrastructure███3%
Energy Policy██2%
Economic Development██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Affordable Housing██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Harrisonburg Planning Commission Meeting - December 11, 2024

The Harrisonburg Planning Commission met on Wednesday, December 11, 2024, at 6:00 PM in Council Chambers with six members present. The meeting covered four major new business items, including rezoning, zoning ordinance amendments for data centers and cash proffers, and a preliminary subdivision plat. All items were recommended for approval by unanimous 6-0 votes and will be forwarded to City Council on January 14, 2025.

Consent Calendar

  • The minutes from the November 13, 2024 Planning Commission meeting were approved by a voice vote (motion by Baugh, second by Nardi).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Data Center Zoning Amendment (Item 3.b):
    • Dominique Kostelac, identified as a data center developer, opposed the amendment, describing it as a "holiday rewrite" and a change of rules midstream after two years of planning. He presented a vision for a community-scaled data campus on B-2 zoned land, emphasizing sustainability and economic opportunity.
    • John Serrell, a resident of 109 Fairway Drive, opposed the amendment, questioning why it was brought forward during the Thanksgiving holiday and alleging a roadblock to a specific project. He stated the data center at 139 Tyco Street has operated without issues.
    • Isaac Whitmer, a resident of Rockingham Drive and member of the Sierra Club, read a statement in support of more restrictive zoning, citing concerns about energy demand, greenhouse gas emissions, water use, noise, and impacts on the city's climate goals. He noted that the commercial sector is already the largest contributor to Harrisonburg's GHG emissions based on the 2022 inventory.
    • Emily Henry, an adjoining property owner and real estate agent, expressed surprise and criticized lack of city coordination. She supported the developer's green building plans and cautioned that changing rules after substantial investment sends a negative message.
  • Cash Proffer Amendment (Item 3.c):
    • Emily Harris Henry, a resident and local real estate agent, opposed cash proffers, arguing they create a quid pro quo atmosphere that disadvantages small local builders who cannot afford large cash contributions. She advocated for value-based development over profit-driven projects.
    • Joseph Enedy, a resident of 420 Eastover Drive, expressed general support for proffers but requested clearer definitions for "residential development," "public transportation facilities," and "public safety facilities" to ensure proper administration and avoid unintended consequences.

Discussion Items

  • 3.a. Rezoning of 160 Carpenter Lane (Florence LLC): The applicant (Scott Hovermale, Vice President of Business Development for Winchester Equipment Company) requested rezoning a ±2.91-acre parcel from B-2 (General Business) to M-1 (General Industrial) to allow relocation of their operations from 230 Charles Street. Staff confirmed the Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Industrial, and a Traffic Impact Analysis was not required as the project would not generate 100 or more new peak hour trips. No proffers were submitted. Commissioners noted the adjacent industrial uses and compatible land use. The motion to recommend approval passed 6-0.
  • 3.b. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Data Centers by Special Use Permit in M-1: Staff (Ms. Soffel) proposed creating a definition for "data center" and requiring a Special Use Permit (SUP) for data centers in M-1, removing the current by-right allowance. The presentation detailed types of data centers, Virginia's concentration (approximately 190 existing and over 300 proposed), and potential impacts (energy, water, noise, visual, electrical infrastructure). Commissioners discussed the need for case-by-case evaluation, environmental concerns, and the JLARC study released that week (December 9, 2024). Vice Mayor Dent noted a presentation from Loudoun County's data center expert confirming environmental risks. Chair Finnegan commended staff's proactive approach but expressed that data centers should be a state-level policy issue due to cross-jurisdictional impacts. The public hearing included opposition from developers and support from environmental advocates. The motion to recommend approval passed 6-0.
  • 3.c. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Acceptance of Cash Proffers: Staff (Ms. Dang) presented a draft amendment to remove the current prohibition on cash proffers in Section 10-3-123(b)(3). Since October 2024, staff consulted with Albemarle County, Arlington County, Goochland County, City of Fredericksburg, City of Manassas, and the Virginia Commission on Local Government. They reported that cash proffers are permissible for both residential and non-residential rezoning, with stricter rules for residential (limited to transportation, schools, public safety, and parks per Virginia Code §15.2-2303.4). Examples of calculation methods were discussed, and staff noted tracking and reporting capabilities. Commissioners addressed concerns about quid pro quo (citing case law prohibiting it), the impact on small builders, and administrative guidance. The motion to recommend approval passed 6-0.
  • 4.a. Preliminary Subdivision and Street Right-of-Way Dedication for East Kaylor Park Drive (Rocktown High School): Staff (Ms. Rupkey) requested approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide ±61.274 acres and dedicate public street right-of-way for the extension of East Kaylor Park Drive. Three variances from the Subdivision Ordinance's Design and Construction Standards Manual (DCSM) were requested: variable right-of-way width (50 ft typical, but variable due to parking and paths), reduced street width (26 ft vs. 34 ft in no-parking sections), and tighter horizontal curves (225-228.7 ft radius vs. 250 ft minimum). All variances meet VDOT standards for local streets. Staff confirmed the traffic impact analysis showed southernmost entrance as highest traffic. Commissioners discussed the need to update the DCSM to reflect modern design philosophies (narrower streets for traffic calming). The motion to recommend approval passed 6-0.

Key Outcomes

  • All four new business items (3.a, 3.b, 3.c, 4.a) were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission with unanimous 6-0 roll call votes. They will be forwarded to the Harrisonburg City Council for final action on January 14, 2025.
  • The data center amendment changes the zoning ordinance to require a Special Use Permit for data centers in M-1 districts, providing local control over location and conditions.
  • The cash proffer amendment removes the prohibition on accepting cash proffers, enabling the city to accept voluntary contributions for rezoning impacts, subject to state law requirements.
  • The preliminary subdivision plat for Rocktown High School includes variances that align with VDOT standards, and staff will consider updating the DCSM in future code rewrites.
  • The meeting adjourned at 7:56 PM. Next month's agenda will include election of officers, a zoning ordinance amendment for 895 North Liberty Street, and updates to commission rules and procedures.

Meeting Transcript

Wednesday, December 11th. We have a quorum with six of six members present. Um there's a seventh that will need to be filled next year. Um do we have any corrections or motions for last month's minutes. If there are none, Mr. Church I'll move approval of the minutes as presented. Second. We have a motion from Commissioner Baugh to approve, a second from Commissioner Nardy. All in favor of approving last month's minute say aye. Aye aye. Any opposed? Any abstaining? Okay. We now move on to item three A in public hearings to consider a request to rezone one sixty Carpenter Lane. Good evening. So the applicant Winchester Equipment Company is proposing to rezone plus or minus two point nine one acre parcel from B Two General Business District to M1 uh General Industrial District. This is the site where dates and interiors used to be. Um the properties. Oh, when we get to the page. There we go. The properties to the north, west, and east across I eighty-one are all zoned M1. That property to the south of uh across Carpenter Lane is a county pro is in the county and is zoned B1. The comprehensive plan designates this site as industrial, which allows for light and general manufacturing wholesaling warehousing and related activities. That proposed use conforms with the general industrial land use guide designation. The property is located at the end of Carpenter Lane next to Interstate 81. Some of you might recall that in 2019, the adjacent property also rezoned from B1 to M1. Or B2 to M1, rather. So Winchester Equipment Company is a construction agricultural equipment firm uh company. They are requested to rezone from B2 to M1. If the rezoning is approved, they plan to move their operations from their current location on Charles Street to the subject site. Any questions? Do we have any questions for staff before we open the public hearing on this? Questions for staff? Okay. I think most of us were on the site tour uh yesterday, so um I will invite the applicant or applicant's representative to speak to this request before we open the public hearing, if you would like uh to approach. And if there's anything you want to add. Um, other than uh my name is Scott Havermill. I'm vice president of business development. Been with the company for 10 years, and um we're wanting to move because we're currently leasing the property on Charles Street and opportunity to purchase a very visible and good location. That's all I have. Any questions for me? Any questions for the applicant? Yes, ma'am. Yes. Commissioner Nardy. Okay. Oh, yes. Well, I did have a question, but you just answered it. Why are you moving? Any other questions for the applicant before we open the public hearing?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com